Repository navigation
feat(PCB rule fidelity): verify source constraints alongside compatibility DRC - #2634
Draft
Tristan-Stoltz-ERC wants to merge 26 commits into
Draft
Tristan-Stoltz-ERC wants to merge 26 commits into
Tristan-Stoltz-ERC wants to merge 26 commits into
Conversation
…and weakened policies
…Cad JSON pointers
…rict-source review records
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds a source-rule-fidelity contract to the PCB routing benchmark evaluator, stacked on #2482 and addressing issue #2626.
The key distinction is two-dimensional: a route can pass an explicitly pinned compatibility DRC while still not preserving the source design's constraints. The module now separately records compatibility-policy pass and strict-source-policy pass.
Claim boundary
The review records are byte-bound, but this evaluator does not authenticate reviewer identity or prove that a migration-equivalence judgement is correct. Human/independent review remains mandatory for real rule migrations and waivers. Test evidence is synthetic and must not be reused as real design evidence.
This change has not yet earned an exact-head CI pass. The isolated Rust workflow must format, compile and execute the new tests before the implementation can be described as validated. No real PCBWorld board rules have been evaluated by this PR, and no SOTA result or physical qualification is claimed.