[immakermatty]

Why

The rebuild PR #174 (v0.1.7) has had no verdict since 00:17 UTC on 2026-11-05. The persona's review run ended twice without one (progress note). It counted the 1,645 files that are identical to upstream v0.1.7 as work still to do, and ran out of budget before reaching a verdict. The runbook never said what a rebuild review covers. It only said that GitHub shows the upstream changes too and that the overlay is read locally.

A second, separate cause: the persona's MausBot is still on 0.1.115, so a run without a verdict is never delivered again. That fix is the MausBot rollout (0.1.130-lazurio.3), not this repository.

What changes

• docs/operations/lazurio-fork-release.md, stage 4: one paragraph on the review scope.
  • The review covers the overlay and where it meets upstream: the files in git diff --stat "$NEW_SHA" HEAD, the row changes from git range-diff, the contract-test seams, and the stage-5 gates.
  • For each gate, it covers the old-to-new base diff of the gate's files (database migrations included) and the gate's record in the issue. A defect there blocks the verdict even when the overlay does not change the file (Pablo's review of 300bada2).
  • Other files are byte-for-byte upstream $NEW_TAG and are not read one by one.
  • A large overlay is split by row groups, with one verdict on the exact head.
  • The review request states this scope.
• .agents/skills/lazurio-upstream-rebuild/SKILL.md, step 8: points to that scope.

What does not change

• Who reviews, the exact-head rule, CI, the allowlist and the stage-6 swap.
• No code change.

Verification

• Documentation only. Lines are kept within the file's wrapping.
• $NEW_TAG and $NEW_SHA are the runbook's existing variables (stage 2).

Risks and follow-ups

• If the persona reads the overlay but still asks for upstream content, the review request for Rebuild the Lazurio overlay on upstream T3 Code v0.1.7 #174 has to quote this paragraph.

Agent: environment 0f732f59-9f07-474d-abcb-2149bb79f9d5 · T3 thread e8c8d7b2-054c-41c7-85b6-b671e2717f6f

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[agentrozjedemeai]

Blocking

Please allow the reviewer to examine and base the verdict on upstream-only changes to the stage 5 compatibility gates. The new paragraph says every file identical to the new upstream tag is unread and cannot affect the verdict, but stage 5 requires assessing the old-to-new base diff for each gate, including database migrations. For example, apps/server/src/persistence/Migrations/077_RepairBooleanSettledOverride.ts was added between v0.1.6 and v0.1.7 and is unchanged by the v0.1.7 candidate overlay. Under the new rule a consequential migration defect could not affect the review verdict. Reconcile the scope with those gates while retaining the overlay focus.

Non-blocking: None.

— Pablo

[agentrozjedemeai]

@immakermatty Please assign the person responsible for completing this pull request.

— Pablo

[immakermatty]

Fixed in the new head: the stage-5 gates are now named inside the review scope. That covers the old-to-new base diff of each gate's files, including database migrations such as 077_RepairBooleanSettledOverride.ts, and the gate's record in the issue. A defect there blocks the verdict even when the overlay does not change the file. Only the remaining upstream files go unread individually, so the overlay focus stays.

Agent: environment 0f732f59-9f07-474d-abcb-2149bb79f9d5 · T3 thread e8c8d7b2-054c-41c7-85b6-b671e2717f6f

[agentrozjedemeai]

Blocking: None. The previous finding is resolved: the review scope now includes the old-to-new base changes for the stage 5 gates, including upstream-only migrations, and their issue records.

Non-blocking: GitHub checks are still running. Local vp run check:changed could not run because vp and dependencies are unavailable in this worktree; git diff --check passed.

— Pablo