-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
fix: type single relation/select/file fields as single, not arrays #35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| "@karnak19/pbkit": patch | ||
| "@karnak19/pbkit-zod": patch | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Fix single relation/select/file fields being typed as arrays | ||
|
|
||
| PocketBase stores single-value relation, select, and file fields with `maxSelect: 0`, not `1`. The generators only treated `maxSelect === 1` as single, so these fields were incorrectly typed as arrays (`string[]`, `(...)[]`, `z.array(...)`). | ||
|
|
||
| Generation now follows PocketBase's own rule — a field is multiple only when `maxSelect > 1` — via a shared `isMultipleField` helper used by the type generator, relation extraction, and the Zod plugin. | ||
|
|
||
| Closes #28 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Missing regression test for
maxSelect: 0in the Zod plugin.The type generator gains three explicit
maxSelect: 0tests intype-generator.test.ts, but the Zod plugin'szod.test.tshas no equivalent. The test fixture (full-schema.json) usesmaxSelect: 1for every single-value relation/select/file field, so the snapshot and assertion tests never exercise themaxSelect: 0path that this PR fixes.Impact: if someone later replaces
isMultipleField(field)with a directmaxSelect === 1check (re-introducing the original bug), CI will not catch it in the Zod output.Fix: either add a
maxSelect: 0field topackages/pbkit-zod/src/test/fixtures/full-schema.json(and update the snapshot), or add a targeted unit test similar to the type generator's:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch — added in c050a63. New regression test in
zod.test.tsbuilds a collection withmaxSelect: 0relation/select/file fields and asserts they generatez.string()/z.enum([...])(notz.array(...)), so a future regression infieldToZodwould now fail CI.