Skip to content

docs: clarify differential methods and contribution forms - #60

Merged
JoshuaJewell merged 3 commits into
JoshuaJewell:mainfrom
hyperpolymath:repair/documentation
Oct 17, 2026
Merged

JoshuaJewell merged 3 commits into
JoshuaJewell:mainfrom
hyperpolymath:repair/documentation

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

@hyperpolymath hyperpolymath commented Oct 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Replaces withdrawn #56. This branch starts directly at upstream main 52feb605 and changes only the README and three contribution templates.

Adds concise differential-abundance guidance distinguishing NB log2 fold changes from CLR differences, plus bug-report, feature-request and PR templates based on CONTRIBUTING.md. Follow-up ea974a2 corrects the workspace description: it does not pass sample read-count bounds to the differential-abundance request.

Validation: checked the method descriptions and request path against the implementation; parsed the issue forms as YAML and checked IDs; git diff --check passes. Full CI passed for the previous commit. CI on ea974a2 passed. Julia/R/bun were not run locally.

Leaves out the external wiki endorsement, new governance policy, duplicated code of conduct, dependency updates and unrelated fork history. Existing licence, citation and acknowledgement text is unchanged.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath marked this pull request as ready for review October 17, 2026 02:07
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 17, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-17T04:03:54.105194Z ea974a2 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 9fc2f71a38

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread README.md Outdated
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath marked this pull request as draft October 17, 2026 03:25

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ea974a2328

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread README.md
Comment thread .github/pull_request_template.md Outdated
@JoshuaJewell
JoshuaJewell merged commit 9702084 into JoshuaJewell:main Oct 17, 2026
3 checks passed
@JoshuaJewell
JoshuaJewell deleted the repair/documentation branch October 17, 2026 14:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants