You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Have you checked for other open Pull Requests for the same change?
Have you explained what your changes do? Performance claims (e.g. "this is faster") must include brew benchmark results.
Have you explained why you'd like these changes included, not just what they do?
For bug fixes, have you given step-by-step brew commands to reproduce the bug?
Have you written new tests (excluding integration tests)? Here's an example.
Have you successfully run brew lgtm (style, typechecking and tests) locally?
I did not use AI/LLM to create this PR, or I disclosed the tool/model below and reviewed its output; I did not attribute commits to AI and will answer maintainer questions and review comments myself without AI/LLM.
I used Claude Code (Claude Opus 5.5) to find this leftover file across Homebrew's repositories and remove it. Claude checked that nothing else in the repository refers to it and ran brew lgtm.
- GitHub stopped reading single-file issue templates on 30 March 2025,
so this file is never shown. The forms in `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/`
already cover what it asked for.
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.
Summary
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Removed the issue template that directed people to the issue chooser and warned that issues submitted without a template could be closed without comment. The repository no longer displays this guidance when someone starts a new issue.
The issue template was removed. It directed users to choose an issue template and stated that issues submitted without one would be closed without comment.
Changes: Issue submission guidance
Layer / File(s)
Summary
Remove issue template .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md
The issue template and its submission guidance were removed.
Merge Risk: Minimal · up to ebe95
No actionable merge-blocking issue is identified; the change is mergeable after normal checks.
Pre-merge checks: 4
Check name
Status
Explanation
Title check
The title "ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md: remove retired template" matches the changeset, which deletes .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md. It names the file and the action. It is concise and specific.
Description check
The description explains why the file is removed. It states that GitHub no longer reads single-file issue templates, so the file is never shown. It also states that the file only points users to the f…
Linked Issues check
Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check
Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Description check
Explanation
The description explains why the file is removed. It states that GitHub no longer reads single-file issue templates, so the file is never shown. It also states that the file only points users to the forms in .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/. It names the related repository pull request and lists the checks the author ran. This is directly related to the changeset.
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
Run CodeRabbit Verify to test the changes in this pull request.
Recent review info
Run configuration
Source mode: Auto
Repository: Unavailable
Branch: Unavailable
File: No configuration file from this repository applied
Commit: Unavailable
Layers: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Advanced
Run ID: e597671c-a771-427d-b58b-e9a0a83fb41b
Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d944230 and ebe95c5.
Files selected for processing: 1
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md
Files with no reviewable changes: 1
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 9 remain after this review.
@MikeMcQuaid This is already rebased on latest master, but "cask audit" is stuck. I think we might need to change the required checks in the main rules from "cask audit" to "cask audit (Linux)" and "cask audit (macOS)".
Edit: I posted this before I saw your comment here: #24459 (comment)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
GitHub stopped reading single-file issue templates on 30 March 2025 (https://github.blog/changelog/2025-02-18-github-issues-projects-february-18th-update/), so
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.mdis never shown. It only asks people to use the forms in.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/, which GitHub already shows when opening an issue, so remove it.Noticed while adding generic templates to repositories without them in Homebrew/.github#507.
brew benchmarkresults.brewcommands to reproduce the bug?brew lgtm(style, typechecking and tests) locally?I used Claude Code (Claude Opus 5.5) to find this leftover file across Homebrew's repositories and remove it. Claude checked that nothing else in the repository refers to it and ran
brew lgtm.