Release CsoKit 0.6.1 - #5
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ed7470b4ae
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| ## Supported workflows | ||
|
|
||
| - Detect and inspect ISO, CSO, ZSO, DAX, and supported CSO2 input. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Limit the inspection claim to CSO inputs
When users interpret “inspect” as the documented csokit info workflow and supply an ISO, ZSO, or DAX file, this claim is incorrect: InfoCommand passes every input to CsoHeaderReader and explicitly documents only info <input.cso> (src/CsoKit.Cli/Commands/InfoCommand.cs:15-16,160-162), so those formats fail header validation even though detect supports them. Split this into detection support for all listed formats and inspection support for CSO1/CSO2.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Prepare CsoKit 0.6.1.