You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was able to run the MEDI build pipeline without getting an error message (although I had to use the K2 functions instead of kraken2-build as I otherwise had rsync problems).
While I am able to run the quant script now and MEDI will produce an output, I believe that there could be an issue with my database size. I specified a max size of 500GB in my script; however, my final hash.k2d file was roughly 354GB and the database.kraken is 155GB.
I would imagine that this could impact the sensitivity of the results as I ran a few test samples an the only food matches in the output were Teas.
Is this an issue you have experienced or do you have any thoughts on why there is a large database size mismatch?
Sorry for not seeing this earlier. That depends a lot on when you downloaded the data and how much could be downloaded successfully. The updates from today make this much more apparent now. As a reference here are my file sizes for a recent build:
total 566G
drwxrws--- 3 o_diener dienerlab 377 Nov 17 2025 .
drwxrws--- 12 o_diener dienerlab 1,4K Aug 3 13:02 ..
-rwxrwx--- 1 o_diener dienerlab 5,2M Nov 17 2025 database100mers.kmer_distrib
-rwxrwx--- 1 o_diener dienerlab 4,8M Nov 17 2025 database150mers.kmer_distrib
-rwxrwx--- 1 o_diener dienerlab 4,1M Nov 17 2025 database250mers.kmer_distrib
-rwxrwx--- 1 o_diener dienerlab 149M Nov 17 2025 food_contents.csv.gz
-rwxrwx--- 1 o_diener dienerlab 90K Nov 17 2025 food_matches.csv
-rwxrwx--- 1 o_diener dienerlab 496G Nov 17 2025 hash.k2d
-rwxrwx--- 1 o_diener dienerlab 169K Nov 17 2025 manifest.csv
-rwxrwx--- 1 o_diener dienerlab 64 Nov 17 2025 opts.k2d
-rwxrwx--- 1 o_diener dienerlab 1,2G Nov 17 2025 seqid2taxid.map
-rwxrwx--- 1 o_diener dienerlab 4,5M Nov 17 2025 taxo.k2d
drwxrws--- 2 o_diener dienerlab 527 Nov 17 2025 taxonomy
Activity
cdiener commentedon Aug 4, 2026
Sorry for not seeing this earlier. That depends a lot on when you downloaded the data and how much could be downloaded successfully. The updates from today make this much more apparent now. As a reference here are my file sizes for a recent build:
total 566G drwxrws--- 3 o_diener dienerlab 377 Nov 17 2025 . drwxrws--- 12 o_diener dienerlab 1,4K Aug 3 13:02 .. -rwxrwx--- 1 o_diener dienerlab 5,2M Nov 17 2025 database100mers.kmer_distrib -rwxrwx--- 1 o_diener dienerlab 4,8M Nov 17 2025 database150mers.kmer_distrib -rwxrwx--- 1 o_diener dienerlab 4,1M Nov 17 2025 database250mers.kmer_distrib -rwxrwx--- 1 o_diener dienerlab 149M Nov 17 2025 food_contents.csv.gz -rwxrwx--- 1 o_diener dienerlab 90K Nov 17 2025 food_matches.csv -rwxrwx--- 1 o_diener dienerlab 496G Nov 17 2025 hash.k2d -rwxrwx--- 1 o_diener dienerlab 169K Nov 17 2025 manifest.csv -rwxrwx--- 1 o_diener dienerlab 64 Nov 17 2025 opts.k2d -rwxrwx--- 1 o_diener dienerlab 1,2G Nov 17 2025 seqid2taxid.map -rwxrwx--- 1 o_diener dienerlab 4,5M Nov 17 2025 taxo.k2d drwxrws--- 2 o_diener dienerlab 527 Nov 17 2025 taxonomy