What is true
Both SM863a drives went into Saruman's bays on 2026-09-18 and #418 closed on that. docs/runbooks/fit-the-saruman-ssds.md says what that means in its status line: step 4 is done and every other step is not. No ssacli on the host, no logical drive (cpqDaLogDrv still reads index 1 only), no thin pool, alexander still on the HDD mirror, no fio, and no cache reading for #76.
Nothing tracks steps 5–11. The milestone is titled assign the disks, then the domain, and until this issue the first half had no issue.
Why it gates the rest
ADR-0029 sizes the domain — six guests, servers continuous, endpoints per session — on ~90 derived write IOPS that nobody has measured. docs/roadmap.md says so: "an unassigned drive changes no duty cycle either — the sentence above holds until the runbook's step 8 measures both arrays." #414, #266 and #451 all rest on that number.
Order of work
The runbook's own, from where it stopped:
Done when
Step 8's two numbers are in hardware.md, alexander boots from the SSD pool, and the roadmap's "holds until step 8 measures both arrays" sentence has been replaced by what it measured. If the wear columns are still blank after §5, that opens its own issue (SSD wear through hpsa).
Refs #418, #414, #76.
What is true
Both SM863a drives went into
Saruman's bays on 2026-09-18 and #418 closed on that.docs/runbooks/fit-the-saruman-ssds.mdsays what that means in its status line: step 4 is done and every other step is not. Nossaclion the host, no logical drive (cpqDaLogDrvstill reads index1only), no thin pool,alexanderstill on the HDD mirror, no fio, and no cache reading for #76.Nothing tracks steps 5–11. The milestone is titled assign the disks, then the domain, and until this issue the first half had no issue.
Why it gates the rest
ADR-0029 sizes the domain — six guests, servers continuous, endpoints per session — on ~90 derived write IOPS that nobody has measured.
docs/roadmap.mdsays so: "an unassigned drive changes no duty cycle either — the sentence above holds until the runbook's step 8 measures both arrays." #414, #266 and #451 all rest on that number.Order of work
The runbook's own, from where it stopped:
ssaclion PVE 9 (item 1 of "What this runbook does not know": never observed working there)alexanderhardware.md, dated notes on ADR-0029/0007/0017,roadmap.md, thenetwork.test.yamlsingle-drive fixtures, both lab runbooks' disk-cache paragraphDone when
Step 8's two numbers are in
hardware.md,alexanderboots from the SSD pool, and the roadmap's "holds until step 8 measures both arrays" sentence has been replaced by what it measured. If the wear columns are still blank after §5, that opens its own issue (SSD wear throughhpsa).Refs #418, #414, #76.