chore: update-node-24#640
Conversation
|
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 57 minutes. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe ChangesNode.js version update
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit d9cc3e9
☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at |
@forgerock/davinci-client
@forgerock/device-client
@forgerock/journey-client
@forgerock/oidc-client
@forgerock/protect
@forgerock/sdk-types
@forgerock/sdk-utilities
@forgerock/iframe-manager
@forgerock/sdk-logger
@forgerock/sdk-oidc
@forgerock/sdk-request-middleware
@forgerock/storage
commit: |
|
Deployed 32dd2e2 to https://ForgeRock.github.io/ping-javascript-sdk/pr-640/32dd2e257eeae269239d1c2907b46ba858949591 branch gh-pages in ForgeRock/ping-javascript-sdk |
📦 Bundle Size Analysis📦 Bundle Size Analysis🚨 Significant Changes🔻 @forgerock/device-client - 0.0 KB (-10.0 KB, -100.0%) ➖ No Changes➖ @forgerock/storage - 1.5 KB 14 packages analyzed • Baseline from latest Legend🆕 New package ℹ️ How bundle sizes are calculated
🔄 Updated automatically on each push to this PR |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.node-version (1)
1-1: 🏗️ Heavy liftUpdate Node 24 compatibility guidance
.node-versionis24, andpackage.jsonalready declares"node": "^20 || ^22 || ^24".- Codebase search found no usage of
url.parse(,tls.createSecurePair(, orBuffer.allocUnsafe(, so the main Node 24 deprecations/removals called out are unlikely to break this repo directly.- Still run integration/unit tests on Node 24 (and verify any transitive dependency requirements), since Node 24 has other behavior changes and the
Buffer.allocUnsafeissue can surface via dependencies.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In @.node-version at line 1, The repo declares .node-version = 24 and package.json already lists "node": "^20 || ^22 || ^24", but we must verify Node 24 compatibility by running tests and checking transitive deps: add/ensure CI job matrix includes Node 24 (so integration/unit tests run under Node 24), run full test suite locally and in CI, and audit dependencies for uses of Buffer.allocUnsafe, url.parse, or tls.createSecurePair (or any deprecation warnings) updating/replacing/transpiling those packages if found; reference the .node-version file, package.json "engines" entry, and search terms Buffer.allocUnsafe, url.parse, tls.createSecurePair when locating issues.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In @.node-version:
- Line 1: The repo declares .node-version = 24 and package.json already lists
"node": "^20 || ^22 || ^24", but we must verify Node 24 compatibility by running
tests and checking transitive deps: add/ensure CI job matrix includes Node 24
(so integration/unit tests run under Node 24), run full test suite locally and
in CI, and audit dependencies for uses of Buffer.allocUnsafe, url.parse, or
tls.createSecurePair (or any deprecation warnings)
updating/replacing/transpiling those packages if found; reference the
.node-version file, package.json "engines" entry, and search terms
Buffer.allocUnsafe, url.parse, tls.createSecurePair when locating issues.
2 participants
JIRA Ticket
n/a
Description
update node 24 in ci
Summary by CodeRabbit