fix(loop-memory): isolate cross-initiative authority evidence#191
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 39 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis change adds the WS-ENG-007-00R4 recovery contract, routes its successor merge intent, directly validates authority sources, and adds regression coverage ensuring cross-initiative starts preserve initiative-local lifecycle identity without borrowing global merge evidence. ChangesAuthority Projection Repair
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In
@.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-ENG-007-concurrent-pr-review-reconciliation/CHUNK_MAP.md:
- Line 9: Update the WS-ENG-007-01 dependency entry in CHUNK_MAP.md to replace
the stale 00R3 prerequisite with 00R4, preserving the existing wording for the
remaining prerequisites and status.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 8354c70d-6608-4095-a386-09efdeebd7ea
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-ENG-007-concurrent-pr-review-reconciliation/CHUNK_MAP.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-ENG-007-concurrent-pr-review-reconciliation/STATUS.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-ENG-007-concurrent-pr-review-reconciliation/chunks/WS-ENG-007-00R4-cross-initiative-authority-projection.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-ENG-007-concurrent-pr-review-reconciliation/reviews/WS-ENG-007-00R4-internal-review-evidence.md.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-ENG-007-concurrent-pr-review-reconciliation/reviews/WS-ENG-007-00R4-pr-trust-bundle.md.agent-loop/merge-intents/WS-ENG-007-00R4.jsonscripts/check_loop_memory_state.pyscripts/test_check_loop_memory_state.pyscripts/test_update_post_merge_memory.pyscripts/update_post_merge_memory.py
PR Trust Bundle: WS-ENG-007-00R4
Intent
Allow a signed start for an idle initiative after another initiative becomes the
latest global merge, without attaching one PR's protected evidence to another
initiative's lifecycle.
Scope
Reviewed Revision
145c1f92f13ad3467ce89fac6895828ef9d01f24CI Integrity
start, or human merge checkpoint was removed or weakened.
Reviewer Result
All nine required internal tracks passed after fixes. No Critical or High
finding remains open.
Human Review Focus
record with foreign protected evidence.
record by both transition validators.
Remaining Risk
A new
mainmerge before this recovery lands requires the branch and evidence tobe refreshed normally; the signed event still requires exact current
main.Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Tests