Skip to content

docs: plan match details, comparisons and private notes - #142

Merged
EMRahman merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/match-details-comparison-notes-plan
Oct 25, 2026
Merged

EMRahman merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/match-details-comparison-notes-plan

Conversation

@EMRahman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Adds the revised match-details design so completed and in-progress archived matches can be named, compared and annotated without changing watch-owned scoring. This documentation-only proposal supersedes the narrower plan in #139.

  • Defines iPhone editing of player names and competition, a derived roster, read-only watch tags, previous-match comparisons and completed-only head-to-head summaries.
  • Specifies independent tag revision merging, explicit clears, watch reconciliation and a forgotten-player ledger to prevent stale copies restoring deleted identities.
  • Keeps private notes in a backup-excluded local sidecar, with separate opt-in sharing; documents export defaults, privacy boundaries and recovery limits in three workflow diagrams.
  • Sequences delivery across four implementation PRs and records release acceptance cases. Privacy policy and architecture changes are assigned to the PRs that ship the feature.

Validation: git diff --cached --check passed; checked fenced-block pairing and local Markdown links, and confirmed the cited merge rule, watch completion callback and current HTML schema version against main. Swift builds/tests were not run because this changes only documentation. Mermaid diagrams were inspected as source and were not rendered. No workflows were manually triggered.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-25T15:49:11.857449Z — PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@EMRahman
EMRahman merged commit fa6d397 into main Oct 25, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant