Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: [improvement] Use AsyncGroq to prevent blocking event loop - #147

Open
Adityasingh-8858 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt/async-groq-3032524503628819152
Open

⚡ Bolt: [improvement] Use AsyncGroq to prevent blocking event loop#147
Adityasingh-8858 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt/async-groq-3032524503628819152

Conversation

@Adityasingh-8858

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

💡 What: Replaced synchronous Groq client with AsyncGroq in FastAPI endpoints.

🎯 Why: Synchronous network calls block the FastAPI asyncio event loop, causing poor concurrent performance.

📊 Impact: Increases concurrency and prevents event loop blocking during Groq API calls.

🔬 Measurement: Load testing the endpoints concurrently to measure latency and throughput.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 3032524503628819152 started by @Deepaksingh7238

Co-authored-by: Deepaksingh7238 <110552872+Deepaksingh7238@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 6, 2026 16:35

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the FastAPI backend to use Groq’s asynchronous client to avoid blocking the asyncio event loop during LLM network calls, improving concurrent request handling.

Changes:

  • Replaced the synchronous Groq client with AsyncGroq in async endpoints and added await to completion calls.
  • Added a short “Bolt” learning note documenting why async HTTP clients should be used in async def endpoints.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

File Description
backend/main.py Switches Groq calls in async endpoints to AsyncGroq + await to avoid event-loop blocking.
.jules/bolt.md Documents the rationale and action item for using async Groq client in async FastAPI endpoints.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread backend/main.py
Comment on lines 317 to +321
global groq_client
if groq_client is None:
groq_client = Groq(api_key=GROQ_API_KEY)
chat_completion = groq_client.chat.completions.create(
# Bolt Optimization: Use AsyncGroq to prevent blocking the FastAPI event loop during network IO
groq_client = AsyncGroq(api_key=GROQ_API_KEY)
chat_completion = await groq_client.chat.completions.create(
Comment thread backend/main.py
Comment on lines 504 to +507
global groq_client
if groq_client is None:
groq_client = Groq(api_key=GROQ_API_KEY)
# Bolt Optimization: Use AsyncGroq to prevent blocking the FastAPI event loop during network IO
groq_client = AsyncGroq(api_key=GROQ_API_KEY)
Comment thread backend/main.py
Comment on lines +319 to +321
# Bolt Optimization: Use AsyncGroq to prevent blocking the FastAPI event loop during network IO
groq_client = AsyncGroq(api_key=GROQ_API_KEY)
chat_completion = await groq_client.chat.completions.create(
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants