Skip to content

docs: replace generic readiness template - #17

Merged
CoreyLeath-code merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/remove-readme-template
Aug 6, 2026
Merged

docs: replace generic readiness template#17
CoreyLeath-code merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/remove-readme-template

Conversation

@CoreyLeath-code

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Removes the copied Production Readiness Guide and replaces it with a repository-specific summary.

Sections removed

  • The entire Production Readiness Guide
  • Its generic CI/license badge line
  • Architecture flowchart
  • Quickstart and local validation
  • The inferred-stack paragraph
  • Research-style metrics and benchmarks evidence table
  • Extended Q&A
  • The generic production-promotion paragraphs

New repository-specific summary

LogSight-AI parses local log files and standard input into typed events, summaries, outlier findings, and error-rate spike reports. It does not operate a hosted service, persist logs, or claim learned incident-detection accuracy. A production deployment would require a supported service boundary, authenticated multi-user access, retention and redaction controls, observability, and an owned deployment and rollback path.

Files changed

File Why
README.md Removes the duplicated template while retaining project-specific documentation.

Validation performed

  • Confirmed the replacement is three sentences and does not make a production-capability claim.
  • Confirmed the project-specific Architecture, Quick Start, metrics/benchmark, documentation, development, and known-gap material remains after the replacement.
  • Repository workflows are triggered for this documentation change.

Risks

  • Documentation-only change; no source, build, dependency, or deployment configuration is modified.

Follow-up recommendations

  • Keep future README additions tied to the repository’s actual execution path and evidence artifacts.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@CoreyLeath-code, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 58 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 0682ae90-75f6-4ad4-b318-6e398c8bda18

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4ac72a6 and 5a33773.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@CoreyLeath-code
CoreyLeath-code marked this pull request as ready for review August 6, 2026 02:45
@CoreyLeath-code
CoreyLeath-code merged commit f9dea4a into main Aug 6, 2026
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant