security: bind recommendation limits to API credentials - #18
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 40 minutes You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary
Closes the rate-limit bypass identified in the audit: recommendation throttling no longer trusts caller-supplied
user_id.Architecture impact
The API derives the in-memory rate-limit key from an HMAC-SHA-256 pseudonym of the submitted API credential, with a fixed domain-separation message. This preserves the existing per-process limiter architecture, does not store the raw credential, and makes changing request payload fields ineffective for evading the bucket. Unauthenticated development traffic shares one bounded bucket.
Files changed
app/api/routes.py— adds a credential-derived, non-secret rate-limit identity, uses it after authorization, and uses HMAC rather than raw SHA-256 so a credential is not handled as a password hash.tests/test_serving_controls.py— verifies that the same credential produces a stable non-secret key and remains limited across attempts.Validation performed
main: only the API route and its focused serving-control test changed.ghtoken is stale; no test result is fabricated.Risks
Future improvements
Refs #13