Skip to content

Bump pr-review model to Claude Opus 4.8#98

Merged
gontzess merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
gontzess/pr-review-quality-parity
Jun 15, 2026
Merged

Bump pr-review model to Claude Opus 4.8#98
gontzess merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
gontzess/pr-review-quality-parity

Conversation

@gontzess

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why

The pr-review action pins the reviewer model to Claude Opus 4.6. Opus 4.8 is the current Opus-tier model (stronger bug-finding, clearer explanations, better long-horizon agentic behavior), so the required PR-review gate should run on it.

What this changes

  • .github/actions/pr-review/action.yml: --model claude-opus-4-6claude-opus-4-8 (one line). No other behavior changes.

Compatibility note

claude-code-action forwards --model opaquely to the bundled Claude Code CLI, which forwards the string to the API (no client-side model allowlist). The action's claude_args pass no thinking/sampling/prefill arguments, so none of the Opus 4.7+ request-surface breaking changes apply here — the bump is a model-string change only.

One thing for the reviewer to weigh: this branch keeps the existing pinned claude-code-action@661a6fefbd05 (v1.0.130, 2026-05-21). That release predates claude-opus-4-8 appearing in the public model catalog, so the bundled CLI may not "know" the model for any client-side defaulting. If we want belt-and-suspenders, pair this with a bump of the pinned action SHA to a current release — but that is a supply-chain change that deserves its own diff review under the secret/write-token boundary, so it's intentionally left out of this PR.

Draft pending that decision.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@gontzess gontzess marked this pull request as ready for review June 15, 2026 14:12
@gontzess gontzess requested a review from a team June 15, 2026 14:12
@gontzess gontzess merged commit 0a4023e into main Jun 15, 2026
3 checks passed
@gontzess gontzess deleted the gontzess/pr-review-quality-parity branch June 15, 2026 14:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants