release: review 7.14.3 Bitcoin-only on current 7.14.2

.github/copilot-instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+# Copilot code review instructions
+
+How reviews on this repository should be conducted. These govern the review
+process itself, not what counts as good code.
+
+## Report everything in one pass
+
+Report every finding you have in a single review. Do not hold findings back for a
+later round.
+
+- Review the complete diff — every changed file, every changed hunk. Do not stop
+  partway through.
+- Finding several problems early is not a reason to end the review. It is a reason
+  to keep going.
+- Do not sample. If a file has twelve problems, report twelve.
+- Comment on every instance of a repeated problem, not just the first. If the same
+  mistake appears in six places, mark all six — the author fixes what is marked, so
+  "and similar issues elsewhere" leaves five defects in the branch.
+
+## Include minor and uncertain findings
+
+Do not filter down to only the findings you are most confident about.
+
+- Report low-severity and minor issues alongside significant ones.
+- Report a finding you are less than certain about, and say plainly what you are
+  unsure of. A finding the author dismisses in ten seconds costs far less than an
+  entire extra review cycle.
+- Label each finding's severity so the author can triage quickly instead of having
+  to weigh every comment equally.
+
+## Converge in as few rounds as possible
+
+Every additional review round costs the author a full cycle. Target:
+
+- **One round** — ideal. Everything surfaced on the first review.
+- **Two or three rounds** — acceptable.
+- **Five rounds** — the absolute ceiling.
+
+A later round should raise only problems introduced by the previous round's fixes.
+A problem that was present in the original diff and went unmentioned until round
+three is a review failure, not a thorough review.
+
+## Do not trade thoroughness for brevity
+
+None of the above is a reason to scrutinize less carefully. The goal is more
+findings per review, not faster reviews. Depth of analysis stays the same; what
+changes is that all of it arrives at once.