Skip to content

Update Ageratum to build 138 更新 Ageratum 至构建 138 - #6006

Merged
Gu-ZT merged 1 commit into
Anvil-Dev:dev/1.21/1.6from
WhereisFff:codex/ageratum-138-1.21
Nov 9, 2026
Merged

Gu-ZT merged 1 commit into
Anvil-Dev:dev/1.21/1.6from
WhereisFff:codex/ageratum-138-1.21

Conversation

@WhereisFff

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

build(deps): 更新 Ageratum 至构建 138

  • 将 1.21.1 分支的 Ageratum 依赖升级至 0.0.1+build.138

- 将 1.21.1 分支的 Ageratum 依赖升级至 0.0.1+build.138
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings November 8, 2026 15:45

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota. Try requesting a review at a lower effort level.

An organization owner can choose the repository organization as the billing source for reviews requested by members with a paid Copilot license. Learn about Copilot code review billing. Review the Copilot code review billing settings.

@Gugle2308 Gugle2308 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

结论:APPROVE。只升级了一行依赖,Ageratum 0.0.1+build.137 → 0.0.1+build.138,没有改动其他依赖或代码。

✅ 核对

  • gradle/libs.versions.toml 只改了 ageratum 一行;anvillib 2.0.0+snapshot.649、minecraft 1.21.1、neoForge 21.1.238、jei 19.50.0.414 均未改动。
  • build.138 是 1.21.1 线的已发布构建;与 #6001 的“build.137 尚不包含实体预览支持”衔接,若该构建已包含 Anvil-Dev/Ageratum#53,则手册 .nbt 的结构实体预览可随之生效。

💡 可选

  • PR 描述只写了版本号,建议补一句 build.138 是否包含 Ageratum#53(结构实体预览),方便 #6001 的已知限制闭环。

📝 建议

  • 合并后跑一次 ./gradlew runData 或启动客户端确认手册 .nbt 结构渲染正常(尤其是含实体/告示牌/炼药锅输出口的 11 个蓝图)。

@Gu-ZT
Gu-ZT merged commit ede41ef into Anvil-Dev:dev/1.21/1.6 Nov 9, 2026
2 checks passed
@WhereisFff
WhereisFff deleted the codex/ageratum-138-1.21 branch November 12, 2026 18:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants