Repository navigation
docs(research): language LEGO grammar ABI to executable multilingual graph queries - #1603
Conversation
|
Important
This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars. ⚙️ Run configuration
Warning Billing warning: we have not been able to collect payment for this subscription for more than 72 hours. Please update the payment method or pay any pending invoices in Billing to avoid service interruption. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 96747ac55b
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| 1. Paraphrases across languages with distinct case/preposition/word-order constructions. | ||
| 2. Known near-misses with different quantifier, scope, polarity, tense, role or evidence binding. | ||
| 3. German Wechselpräposition (`wo` vs `wohin`), dative recipient vs beneficiary, and accusative object vs direction. | ||
| 4. Relative clauses: antecedent gender/number/case agreement *within the relative clause*, long references outside the i4 window, and ambiguous neuter pronouns. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Separate antecedent agreement from relative-pronoun case
For relative clauses where the antecedent and pronoun have different syntactic roles, this fixture requirement incorrectly includes case in their agreement. The relative pronoun agrees with its antecedent in gender and number, but its case is determined within the relative clause—as the RFC's own dem Kind, das ... example demonstrates. Implementing this item literally would reject precisely the valid cross-case construction the experiment is intended to preserve.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Purpose
Capture the language LEGO architecture before it disperses across chat context: grammatical constructions become canonical, addressable semantic functions and an executable natural-language query frontend for the existing SoA/masked-RelAlg/Datalog-AST/R2IL/Quack/NAL substrate. Cypher remains an optional frontend rather than a compulsory translation target.
Added
docs/research/linguistic-lego-grammar-to-query-rfc.mdG4D34×3-byte TEKAMOLO facet, actual24×i4event-locus contract, one CE64 layout/orientation codebook, and no per-verse/tenant register identity.docs/research/linguistic-lego-corpus-and-falsification-matrix.mdCritical guardrails
Suggested next action
Review the two docs, then choose L-1 (round-trip UD/CoNLL-U SoA DTO) plus L-2 (Krill span/operator differential harness) as narrowly scoped subsequent PRs; keep an independently annotated cross-language natural-question AST oracle for L-5.