Skip to content

dir-sim plan: identity model, cloud fold, ExchangeGuid comparison - #339

Merged
AdaWorldAPI merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ccr-0455e606-wmtsor
Oct 10, 2026
Merged

AdaWorldAPI merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ccr-0455e606-wmtsor

Conversation

@AdaWorldAPI

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

This updates docs/DIRECTORY-SIMULATION-POC.md to match what is merged on lance-graph (#1444–#1447) and here (#337, #338). It changes docs only.

  • V8 (correction). mail is a property on the user's business card. It is not part of the address key space and never makes an object a holder in AddressConflict. The original text stays in place; a dated correction follows it.
  • V10. Holding an address is not the same as receiving at it. The UPN is claimed by owners. SMTP and routing addresses are claimed only by mail recipients. Provisioning follows the recipient type, not the account's enabled flag.
  • V11. Exchange identity:
    • ExchangeGuid is the immutable mailbox identity.
    • PrimarySmtpAddress identifies the recipient implicitly, as a mutable string.
    • ExternalDirectoryObjectId links the mailbox to its Entra user, which carries {alias}@{tenant}.onmicrosoft.com.
    • The routing address {alias}@{tenant}.mail.onmicrosoft.com is the external EOP target.
  • V12. The cloud fold, and the ExchangeGuid comparison:
    • On-premises value empty: awaiting backsync, which Entra Connect does only with its Exchange hybrid option checked.
    • Values match: migratable.
    • Values differ: blocks the cloud mailbox.
    • Open: the hybrid option is not observed, and there is no Exchange Online ingest yet.
  • V13. The edge verdicts (Authoritative vs InternalRelay, leftover proxies) are parked until EOP is modelled.
  • V14. Open: should the owner gate follow Entra's uniqueness across all objects?

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01G22yT6htkcdyXsihxxXdrg


Generated by Claude Code

…ngeGuid comparison

V8 gains a correction: mail is a business-card property, not in the
address key space. New V10 (holding vs receiving), V11 (Exchange
identity), V12 (cloud fold + ExchangeGuid states, with the open items),
V13 (edge verdicts parked until EOP), V14 (owner gate across Entra, open).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01G22yT6htkcdyXsihxxXdrg
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review in Change Stack →

Note

Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait...

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Essentials
  • Run ID: 16bbd5d8-8b2c-4698-9baf-90a8242d390c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b9d698c and c17221e.


📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/DIRECTORY-SIMULATION-POC.md

 _______________________________________________________________
< Making your code shine like the top of the Chrysler Building. >
 ---------------------------------------------------------------
  \
   \   (\__/)
       (•ㅅ•)
       /   づ
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Warning

Billing warning: we have not been able to collect payment for this subscription for more than 72 hours. Please update the payment method or pay any pending invoices in Billing to avoid service interruption.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@AdaWorldAPI
AdaWorldAPI marked this pull request as ready for review October 10, 2026 12:41
@AdaWorldAPI
AdaWorldAPI merged commit 7aaf824 into main Oct 10, 2026
4 checks passed
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-10T12:42:30.951445Z c17221e Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants