Skip to content

fix(deps): update dependency fastify to v5 [security] - #1815

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/npm-fastify-vulnerability
Open

fix(deps): update dependency fastify to v5 [security]#1815
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/npm-fastify-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Oct 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ℹ️ Note

This PR body was truncated due to platform limits.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
fastify (source) ^3.28.0 → ^5.0.0 age confidence
fastify (source) ^3.28.0 → ^5.0.0 age confidence

Fastify: Incorrect Content-Type parsing can lead to CSRF attack

CVE-2022-41919 / GHSA-3fjj-p79j-c9hh

More information

Details

Impact

The attacker can use the incorrect Content-Type to bypass the Pre-Flight checking of fetch. fetch() requests with Content-Type’s essence as "application/x-www-form-urlencoded", "multipart/form-data", or "text/plain", could potentially be used to invoke routes that only accepts application/json content type, thus bypassing any CORS protection, and therefore they could lead to a Cross-Site Request Forgery attack.

Patches

For 4.x users, please update to at least 4.10.2
For 3.x users, please update to at least 3.29.4

Workarounds

Implement Cross-Site Request Forgery protection using @fastify/csrf.

References

Check out the HackerOne report: https://hackerone.com/reports/1763832.

For more information

Fastify security policy

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 4.2 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Fastify's Content-Type header tab character allows body validation bypass

CVE-2026-25223 / GHSA-jx2c-rxcm-jvmq

More information

Details

Impact

A validation bypass vulnerability exists in Fastify where request body validation schemas specified by Content-Type can be completely circumvented. By appending a tab character (\t) followed by arbitrary content to the Content-Type header, attackers can bypass body validation while the server still processes the body as the original content type.

For example, a request with Content-Type: application/json\ta will bypass JSON schema validation but still be parsed as JSON.

This vulnerability affects all Fastify users who rely on Content-Type-based body validation schemas to enforce data integrity or security constraints. The concrete impact depends on the handler implementation and the level of trust placed in the validated request body, but at the library level, this allows complete bypass of body validation for any handler using Content-Type-discriminated schemas.

This issue is a regression or missed edge case from the fix for a previously reported vulnerability.

Patches

This vulnerability has been patched in Fastify v5.7.2. All users should upgrade to this version or later immediately.

Workarounds

If upgrading is not immediately possible, user can implement a custom onRequest hook to reject requests containing tab characters in the Content-Type header:

fastify.addHook('onRequest', async (request, reply) => {
  const contentType = request.headers['content-type']
  if (contentType && contentType.includes('\t')) {
    reply.code(400).send({ error: 'Invalid Content-Type header' })
  }
})
Resources

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 7.5 / 10 (High)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Fastify Vulnerable to DoS via Unbounded Memory Allocation in sendWebStream

CVE-2026-25224 / GHSA-mrq3-vjjr-p77c

More information

Details

Impact

A Denial of Service vulnerability in Fastify’s Web Streams response handling can allow a remote client to exhaust server memory. Applications that return a ReadableStream (or Response with a Web Stream body) via reply.send() are impacted. A slow or non-reading client can trigger unbounded buffering when backpressure is ignored, leading to process crashes or severe degradation.

Patches

The issue is fixed in Fastify 5.7.3. Users should upgrade to 5.7.3 or later.

Workarounds

Avoid sending Web Streams from Fastify responses (e.g., ReadableStream or Response bodies). Use Node.js streams (stream.Readable) or buffered payloads instead until the project can upgrade.

References

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 3.7 / 10 (Low)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Release Notes

fastify/fastify (fastify)

v5.7.3

Compare Source

⚠️ Security Release

What's Changed

Full Changelog: fastify/fastify@v5.7.2...v5.7.3

v5.7.2

Compare Source

⚠️ Notice ⚠️

Parsing of the content-type header has been improved to a strict parser in PR #​6414. This means only header values in the form described in RFC 9110 are accepted.

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: fastify/fastify@v5.7.1...v5.7.2

v5.7.1

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: fastify/fastify@v5.7.0...v5.7.1

v5.7.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: fastify/fastify@v5.6.2...v5.7.0

v5.6.2

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: fastify/fastify@v5.6.1...v5.6.2

v5.6.1

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: fastify/fastify@v5.6.0...v5.6.1

v5.6.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: fastify/fastify@v5.5.0...v5.6.0

v5.5.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: fastify/fastify@v5.4.0...v5.5.0

v5.4.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

❗ Important

✂ PR body was truncated to here.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants