Skip to content

[Question] Is VMS compatibility is still a goal? #13

Description

@Houkime

In the

Name must not be more than 15 characters because of $ASCEFC.

$ASCEFC (Associate Common Event Flag Cluster) limitations are mentioned, but
#define qdb_cNameDbLock "/tmp/pwr_qdb_lock"

is already longer than 15 (it is 18)

hence the question:
Is VMS compatibility is still a goal or all of VMS-related stuff can be disregarded/deleted?

and also:
what are the actual limitations on shared memory section names then?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions