[Decision] Skills optimization program — batch 3 (5 items): DATA-F-07 defineHook() vs the platform's own examples · #13597 Phase-2 — X0 quote policy · CLAUDE.md excerpt form · the four-copy decision frame · cross-file line-budget moves

Decision batch 3 of the skills catalog optimization program #14292 (maintainer mandate 2026-09-02, verbatim: 「审核所有的 skills，进行全面的优化。」). Filed by the skills lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1). Five items; a one-line reply (e.g. 1A 2C 3B 4B 5A) executes them. What waits on this: #14297 closes on item 1; #13597 Phase 2 (the internal-corpus cuts — #14445 · #14209 · #14133 and the platform-readings intake) starts on items 2–5. Nothing else in the programme waits: the remaining flights, the stub deletions and the seam card #14559 proceed.

Measured at objectstack origin/main (2026-09-02 ~18:2xZ) and the #13597 Phase-1 tables (Tables 1–6, pinned at a59f78d). No file was edited.

1. DATA-F-07 —— 已发布 data skill 教 `defineHook()`,平台自己的两个真实 hook 却用裸字面量:改文档,还是改示例?

一句话问题:skills/objectstack-data 在 14 处教 defineHook()(references/data-hooks.md:68「Author it with defineHook()」+ 7 个示例;第 1 轮已把重复陈述合为一处),packages/spec/src/data/hook.zod.ts:1016 导出它(导入期校验)。仓库里 packages/spec、packages/cli 之外 0 个文件调用它;两个真实 hook 都是裸字面量 —— examples/app-crm/src/hooks/opportunity.hook.ts:9 export const OpportunityStageHook: Hook = {,examples/app-todo/src/objects/task.hook.ts:50 const taskHook: Hook = {。审计判「处方合理,但平台自己的示例与之矛盾 —— 该维护者定,不是文档编辑」。

选项 × 真实代价

A 处方保留;立一张 S 卡把两个示例迁到 defineHook()(2 文件,各包一层;归示例所在车道)。代价:一张卡、一次跨车道派发;skill 零改动。
B 删处方,改教裸字面量(与语料一致)。代价:放弃「导入期校验」这条平台能力在目录里的唯一教学点;data-hooks.md 净减约 20 tok。
C 两边都不动。代价:矛盾留在对外发布面上 —— 读 skill 的 agent 与读示例的 agent 学到两种写法。

业务含义:A = 客户的 agent 写 hook 时在 import 就被 schema 拒绝,不是在运行时;B = 客户的 agent 照示例写,错误延后到运行时;C = 看谁先被读到。

四维:① 长远合理性 —— defineHook() 是 spec 里活着的导出,处方指向平台已建的校验路径,把示例对齐是收敛不是增生;② 实际拉动 —— 真实 hook 文件 2 个 / 26 个对象文件,量小,但 hook 是写坏最难发现的元数据;③ 防 AI 犯错 —— 矛盾本身就是让 agent 猜的根源,A 消灭矛盾且不减校验;④ 不扩散 —— A 不加文档、只改 2 个示例文件;B 删;C 零成本零收益。

推荐 A;回退 B。置信缺口:defineHook() 是否是维护者认定的正典写法(两个示例可能早于它),本席不重裁。

裁后执行:A ⇒ 立示例迁移卡(未定级,归示例所在车道),#14297 记录后关卡;B ⇒ #14297 第三轮:删 data-hooks.md:68 处方、7 个示例改裸字面量,同文件付账;C ⇒ #14297 记录后直接关卡。

2. #13597 Phase-2 · X0 —— 内部语料逐字内联维护者裁决原话的政策

一句话问题:.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** 与 .claude/agents/os-dev.md 把维护者裁决原话逐字内联(Phase-1 各表逐文件计了 X0 行:os-dev.md 2 个引用块 / 4 行,CLAUDE.md 0,SKILL.md 与 lanes/* 以「日期 + 原话」散布数十处)。三种政策:

A 全部保留(现状)。代价:每次会话都装载裁决史;引用块是 DUP/DEM 之外最大的可削类别。
B 只留日期 + 指向裁决评论的指针。代价:原话离开指令面;引用本身就是操作性判据的地方(例如「re-wrap 不得用作筹行」)读者要跳出去才能判。
C 只在引用本身就是操作性判据处保留原话,其余改日期 + 指针(Table 1 推荐)。代价:逐处判「原话是否是判据」,Phase-2 每处砍点须写明归类。

四维:① 长远 —— 裁决的权威源是 GitHub 评论,指令面只需可判定的规则;② 拉动 —— 内部面,拉动是每轮 token;③ 防错 —— 判据处原话保留,agent 不会把裁决改述成别的规则;④ 不扩散 —— C 是最小改法。

推荐 C。置信缺口:「操作性判据」的边界由执行 dev 逐处判,ACCEPT 逐条核。

3. #13597 Phase-2 · `CLAUDE.md` 的摘录形态(86 行,天花板 86)

一句话问题:CLAUDE.md 是每个座位每次会话必被注入的唯一指令文件(本席实测:harness 注入 CLAUDE.md、不注入 AGENTS.md),其中 78 行是四条规则的手抄摘录(Table 4 行 C2–C5),两条已漂移:C4 :50 指向「AGENTS.md §9」而 §9 是「拉 main 后刷新构建状态」(refs/remotes 规则住无编号前言 :395–414);C5 :78「~18 merges … 一个工作日」是锚点没有的统计。

A 保留四条摘录,只修两处漂移(+ −2 DEM):86 → ~84。代价:最贵的 78 行照付;手抄摘录会再漂。
B 每块降为「⛔ 规则一句 + 钩子/逃生开关 + 指向 AGENTS.md 锚点」:约 30 行。代价:事故叙事离开 CLAUDE.md(仍在 AGENTS.md 锚点);章程句「四条规则内联,因为漏一条就毁别人工作」改写为「四条规则各一句内联」。
C 摘录改为机械镜像(像 check-published-list-mirrors 那样由门禁比对锚点):行数不变,漂移归零。代价:新门禁 + AGENTS.md 锚点段落须可切块。

四维:① 长远 —— B 或 C 都终结手抄漂移类;② 拉动 —— 每会话 ~50 行 × 全部座位;③ 防错 —— 规则句不动,agent 行为不变;④ 不扩散 —— B 删、C 加门禁。

推荐 B;回退 A(两处修正无论如何做)。置信缺口:CLAUDE.md 现形态是否维护者刻意为之(章程句 :1–6)。

4. #13597 Phase-2 · 决策框架四份副本(`check:skill-frame-sync` 锁定)

一句话问题:同一「四轴决策框架」在四处逐字同构:.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md(internal-pm)、.claude/agents/os-dev.md(internal-dev,Table 4 行 O56:DUP 13)、skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/SKILL.md 两份(published-pm、published-dev;#14660 拆分时因门禁按路径钉住而留在入口)。门禁保证四份同构,也把 3 份重复锁成不可削。

A 保持四份(现状)。代价:内部 13 行 + 对外约 630 tok 的重复永久化;拆分后入口仍背 published-dev 块。
B 降为两份:internal-pm + published-pm;dev 侧改为占位/指针(rules/dev-template.md 已有 {decision_frame} 占位 —— 派发时由 PM 副本填入)。改 scripts/check-skill-frame-sync.mjs 的 COPIES(4 → 2)与 freshness 门禁的自检;反休眠指纹扫描继续禁止未申报副本。代价:一次门禁改动 + 自检更新;dev 读到的框架来自 PM 粘贴而非文件。
C 降为一份内部 + 一份对外,dev 副本改为「四轴名摘要」(不同构、门禁放行摘要)。代价:门禁要区分「摘要」与「副本」,新类别。

四维:① 长远 —— 框架单源,门禁看两处;② 拉动 —— pm-dispatch 入口再减约 630 tok(published-dev 块),os-dev.md −13 行;③ 防错 —— dev 拿到的是 PM 派发时粘贴的同一块,不会读到过期副本;④ 不扩散 —— B 删 2 份。

推荐 B。置信缺口:published-dev 块是否被 {decision_frame} 之外的读者依赖(本席扫描 skills/** 与 .claude/** 未见)。

5. #13597 Phase-2 · 跨文件行预算搬运

一句话问题:行棘轮按文件、只降不升。Table 3 测出 platform-readings.md 应收编 3 条误置的按仓门禁事实(lanes/cli.md:17–20、lanes/services.md:21–22、rest-channel.md:78–84,约 +10 行),而它自身 0–14% 可削、天花板无余量;lanes/* 的 DUP 砍点有余量。现规则下这 +10 只能由维护者逐次裁提额。

A 允许同一 PR 内跨文件搬运:被搬入文件提额 ≤ 搬出文件同 PR 净减,语料总行数 ≤ 0,提额行注释引本裁决。代价:棘轮多一种合法提额路径(仍须 PR 正文列账)。
B 不允许;误置事实留在原处(或在原处砍掉)。代价:按仓事实继续散在 lanes,读者查两处。
C 逐次单独裁(现状)。代价:每次 +N 行都是一张决策卡。

四维:① 长远 —— 事实归其单源文件;② 拉动 —— 内部面;③ 防错 —— 单源即少一处过期副本;④ 不扩散 —— A 以「语料总行数不增」为闸,不是放松。

推荐 A。置信缺口:check:ratchet-remedy-authority 把「扩张性补救」标为 MAINTAINER-ONLY —— A 需在该门禁的自述里加一条「本裁决授权的跨文件搬运」例外,由 Phase-2 首个搬运 PR 携带。

Refs: #14292 (program anchor) · #14296 (batch 1, ruled 1A 2A 3A 4A) · #14568 (batch 2, ruled A) · #14297 (item 1) · #13597 (items 2–5; Tables 1–6) · #14660 (the split that left published-dev in the entry).

Item 2 — flight stopped at a fork, decision card filed: #14859 (skills programme batch 4, one item). Skills-lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1), 2026-09-03T05:56Z.

The dev's report (5521172695) was read from the card, and its three measurements re-verified by the seat at origin/main 5ff5f9576c (05:53Z): scripts/pm/check-skill-id-lint.mjs:13-18 carries the 2026-08-12 ruling verbatim with "Maintainer-ruling provenance keeps DATE + VERBATIM QUOTE — numbers go", scans SCAN_ROOT='.claude/skills/pm-dispatch' + EXTRA_FILES=['.claude/agents/os-dev.md','AGENTS.md'] with ID_PATTERN=/#[0-9]{3,}/g; AGENTS.md:10-14 states the same convention; a grep for the issue-number token over the two surfaces ruling C names hits zero files; the branch claude/issue-14685-x0-quote-policy sits at f3ae441fa2 with zero commits. So ruling C's "date plus a pointer to the authoritative GitHub comment" has no pointer to convert to, its issue-number spelling is red on a gate that encodes the earlier ruling, and the maintainer comment it points at frequently does not exist (rulings made in PM chat, recorded in seat-written issue bodies). Two maintainer rulings point opposite ways on one gated surface; only the maintainer retires one.

Options on #14859: A1 issue-number pointer (needs the gate and the 2026-08-12 ruling amended) · A2 bare comment-id pointer (about 44 verify-or-drop lookups, non-dereferenceable ids) · B date only, rule stated in the surrounding prose — the lane's and the dev's recommendation · C keep every quote (item 2 becomes a no-op). The classification (54 sites: 5 KEEP, 4 frame-text skipped, 44 pointer-eligible) is complete for both named surfaces and identical under A1 / A2 / B; references/** is unclassified and is classified in the same follow-up flight.

State: item 2 Blocked-by: #14859; the slot is freed (3 of 5 in use: item 3 delivered as PR #14855 and PASSed, items 4 and 5 in flight). This card stays pm:dispatched for the other three flights. Recorded for the seat ledger, not filed yet: the flight's single-source finding (the same maintainer quote written out at SKILL.md:928/:929 and lanes/director.md:8/:54, SKILL.md:645 and os-dev.md:320, SKILL.md:904 / os-dev.md:418 / decision-analysis.md:50) — item 4 removes one of those copies and the #13597 Phase-1 DUP rows already carry the class, so the card waits for the #14859 ruling.

Generated by Claude Code

ACCEPT — item 3 (ruling B), PR #14855 @94f328e8ff. Skills-lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1), reviewer of record, 2026-09-03T05:58Z. Contract review PASS is on record above (5521146050, in-seat at tier, 05:47Z) with the per-clause verification; this ACCEPT adds the CI witness and the terminal state.

CI at 94f328e8ff, read 05:57Z: Lint & Repo Gates completed success (check run 100536917275, run 33719970168); TypeScript Type Check + its three sub-jobs success; Test Core success; Check Changeset success; Governed Surface Queue Guard success; Part-of PR must not also close its card success; the single-writer-path guard success; Auto Label success. No red check run on the head.
Labels after the strip, read back: documentation · size/s · skip-changeset.
Diff re-read by the seat from the fetched branch, not the report: one file, CLAUDE.md 86 → 36 lines (5,474 → 2,095 bytes, 1,369 → 524 tokens under the ratchet's own convention); the four ## headings byte-identical to origin/main; every pointer resolves at the branch head; both ruled drifts gone; the charter sentence reads as ruled.
Ratchet: 36 ≤ 86 (headroom 50 for the post-flight re-lock pin PR); the ceiling map untouched by this PR.
Follow-ups harvested to the seat ledger (filed by the seat after dedup, not by the dev): objectui's CLAUDE.md carries the same excerpt shape (51 lines; a duplication, its "§9" pointer resolves there); the zero-quota issue-page channel serves only the first 15 timeline items and the PR page carries no label payload (platform-readings intake).
Terminal: governed CLAUDE.md ⇒ the PR stays DRAFT; reviewers os-zhuang + hotlong requested at 05:58Z and read back; human merge is the record. At MERGED nothing closes (this is a Part of flight); the seat records the landing here and on PM corpus audit (maintainer-directed): classify every instruction line — keep / duplicate / demote / delete — then rewrite and re-lock every ratchet #13597.

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

Flight report — item 5

Session: session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1
PR: #14860 (DRAFT)
Branch: claude/issue-14685-ratchet-cross-file-move
Head sha: 62ddd75fb5056c0d245171aab5d5f437335e8b02 (merge of origin/main 5ff5f9576c, base f3ae441fa2)
Status: done. Premise still valid — every measurement in the flight brief reproduced at base f3ae441fa2.

What landed

The rule in scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs: a declared same-PR cross-file move, with the three ruled conditions re-derived from the tree on every run. Mechanical form (i), in-tree declaration data (CROSS_FILE_MOVES), not (ii) a --baseline origin/main diff — a baseline ref answers nothing once the move has landed, origin/main is a shared local snapshot a sibling's fetch moves, a shallow CI checkout need not carry it, and a gate that cannot find its input must fail rather than skip. Verdict lines and exit codes unchanged; two output lines added. Self-test 111 to 136 cases.
The exception in scripts/check-ratchet-remedy-authority.mjs, in comment space with two new self-test assertions. No new verdict class: the amended ratchet lives in scripts/pm/ and that gate's walk is a non-recursive readdir of scripts/, so the exception is honestly documentary today — the second assertion reds if the walk is ever widened.
The first move: three per-repo readings consolidate into references/platform-readings.md. platform-readings.md +10 against a net source decrease of 11 (lanes/cli.md -4, lanes/services.md -2, rest-channel.md -5). Ceiling map total 5112 to 5111. No pointer sentence left at any source.

Arithmetic

File	Lines b/a	Ceiling b/a	Bytes b/a	Tokens b/a
`lanes/cli.md`	35 / 31	35 / 31	2117 / 1786	530 / 447
`lanes/services.md`	30 / 28	30 / 28	1762 / 1577	441 / 395
`rest-channel.md`	93 / 88	93 / 88	8277 / 7704	2070 / 1926
`platform-readings.md`	314 / 324	314 / 324	33424 / 34549	8356 / 8638
TOTAL	472 / 471 (-1)	-1	45580 / 45616 (+36)	11397 / 11406 (+9)

Lines fall by one; bytes rise by 36 and tokens by 9. The ruled condition is in lines and it holds, but the byte direction is stated rather than smoothed: the 36 bytes are the navigational clause the new bullet carries instead of restating the per-job-conclusion rule the destination already owns. Tokens measured with countTokens from check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs.

Gates

24 of the 25 run commands exit 0 (23 derived at head + check:role-word + the token ratchet). Full table with each gate's own verdict line is in the PR body, section 5.

check:pm-skill-ratchet — ✓ cross-file move into … platform-readings.md: +10 (314→324) against a net source decrease of 11 …; authorised by #14685 item 5 (comment 5520452691) and ✓ declared cross-file moves: 1, total ceilings down 1 line; self-test 136 cases pass.
check:ratchet-remedy-authority — OK 184 scripts swept; 12 mark … 6 turn it down … 166 … — byte-identical to the same line at base, which is the claim that the exception changed no verdict.
check:pm-skill-id-lint, check:skill-frame-sync, check:pm-governed-merges, check:pm-dispatch-gates, check:role-word, check-skills-token-ratchet all green.
check-doc-formula-expressions first exited 3 (PREREQUISITE NOT MET); prerequisite supplied (@objectstack/formula then @objectstack/lint built through os-verify-lock.sh, slot issue-14685-ratchet-cross-file-move, held 2s and 6s, waited 0s) and re-run to a real green verdict.
NOT MEASURED: check-test-completeness (exit 3, grades a saved turbo test log the derived family cannot supply); the always-runs tail and the CI-measured-only family; nine changeset-dependent families (this PR carries none by design); and pnpm lint, declared as a narrowing rather than run.

Reverse verification

Three mutations against the committed implementation, each proved on disk by grep counts of removed and injected text (never an editor exit code), each restored with git checkout HEAD -- {absolute path} and proved restored by git hash-object matching the HEAD blob plus an empty git diff HEAD; trap on EXIT/INT/TERM with absolute paths. A source ceiling grown back reds (+10 vs a net decrease of 7, total +3); the citation stripped reds while the total stays green (the two checks are independent); the destination raised to 326 reds both legs (+12 vs 11). Control green.

A fourth, unplanned reverse verification happened in check-ratchet-remedy-authority: the new "exception lives in comment space" assertion reddened on its first run because the phrase was spelled as a plain string literal in the test, which put it into that gate's author-facing text. It is assembled from parts now, the way that file's existing hoist idiom is.

Judgement calls

lanes/cli.md's per-job-conclusion rule was NOT copied. It is already stated in platform-readings.md 队列成员资格 (门禁放行判据 = 承载门禁族 job 的 conclusion …). The moved bullet points at it; a restatement would have paid ceiling for a second copy. Recorded in the ceiling comment so nobody "restores" it later.
cli.md and services.md facts folded into one destination bullet — same rule (an aggregate is not a verdict), two named instruments.
All three land in 读数陷阱, not split across 队列成员资格. Both placements defensible; one heading, one reader route.
No new verdict class in the remedy-authority gate — a fifth class with a population of zero is enforcement nobody has.
rest-channel.md's bullet moved byte-identically, verified by comparing the deleted span against the added span.

Channel declarations

Repo-scoped REST is 403 for this seat (GitHub access is not enabled for this session), probed on both a read (GET /issues/14685) and the additive label write (POST /issues/14860/labels). gh absent. So card and ruling reads went through the zero-quota public page payload channel and writes through MCP.
The label fallback stripped a concurrent label, and the read-back caught it. I read the pre-write label set off the rendered page but grepped the wrong marker and concluded "no labels"; the page in fact carried size/m. The whole-set MCP write therefore did not union it. The comparative read-back shows the final set as skip-changeset · needs:contract-review · size/m · documentation — the labeler re-applied its two, so the end state is correct and nothing needs repair. Recording the mechanism rather than the outcome: the correct marker on a rendered PR page is data-name="…", not the label href or CSS class.
One MCP call (issue_read get_labels) failed with API rate limit already exceeded for user ID …; the write moments later succeeded. Transient, not a channel loss.
PR body read back in full from the rendered page: every marker from the first line to the footer survives, and the footer kept its session-URL form (create-only, as expected).

Deviations, self-declared

The first commit (0db857828a) carries Part of #14685 / Part of #13597 trailers in its message. The squash-branch rule puts card relations in the PR body only. Not amendable without a force-push, which is forbidden; the following commits carry none, and no closing keyword is involved, so nothing can be closed by it.
That same commit's Co-Authored-By omits the model suffix the harness specifies; the later commits use the harness trailer verbatim.

Out-of-scope findings — not filed by me, for the seat to dedup and file

scripts/check-ratchet-remedy-authority.mjs sweeps scripts/*.{mjs,mts} non-recursively, so every gate under scripts/pm/** is structurally outside the check:engine-double-contract fires at CI time, not authoring time — four independent PRs tripped it on brand-new test files in one shift, and a pre-warning in the brief did not prevent it #8435 convention — including both pm ratchets, one of which is a shrink-only ratchet handing out remedies. The gate's own docblock defends the flat glob on precision grounds (a subtree spelling would name it for files it never opens), so this is a coverage question for a maintainer, not a defect to fix in passing. Made visible by the new self-test assertion, which reds if the walk is widened. scripts/check-ratchet-remedy-authority.mjs:186 (the corpusFiles docblock) and :~1080 (the new assertion).
Three ceiling-map rows have drifted below their own headroom-0 convention and can be tightened opportunistically, which the ratchet's own hint invites: AGENTS.md 1157/1162 (headroom 5), .claude/skills/spec-property-retirement/SKILL.md 333/337 (headroom 4), and the same file's max-table-row pin 326/328 — the gate prints ℹ️ … lower the pin to 326 on every run. Pre-existing, unrelated to this diff, and paying them down is always legitimate. scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs CEILINGS and MAX_TABLE_ROW_BYTES.

Structured report

{
  "issue": 14685,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/issue-14685-ratchet-cross-file-move",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/14860",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "Item 5 (ruled A) only. check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs gains the declared same-PR cross-file move: the destination's raise must be covered by the named sources' net decrease, the map-wide total must not increase, and the declaration must cite the ruling; the form is in-tree declaration data rather than a --baseline origin/main diff, because a baseline ref answers nothing after the move lands, is a shared moving snapshot, and need not exist in a shallow CI checkout. check-ratchet-remedy-authority.mjs records the exception in comment space with two new self-test assertions and no new verdict class, and states honestly that it is documentary today because that gate's walk is a non-recursive readdir of scripts/ while the amended ratchet lives in scripts/pm/. The first move consolidates three misplaced per-repo readings into platform-readings.md: +10 against a net source decrease of 11 (cli.md -4, services.md -2, rest-channel.md -5, the last moved byte-identically), ceiling map total 5112 to 5111. Lines fall by 1 while bytes rise 36 and tokens 9; reported, not smoothed.",
  "tests": "At final head 62ddd75fb5 (post-merge of origin/main 5ff5f9576c). Union derived with `node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --commands` at that commit, 6 paths, 23 commands; all run, exit codes captured by redirect before any pipe. 22 of 23 exit 0; check-test-completeness exits 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET (grades a saved turbo test log) and is recorded NOT MEASURED. check-doc-formula-expressions first exited 3 (unbuilt @objectstack/formula); prerequisite supplied via os-verify-lock.sh (slot issue-14685-ratchet-cross-file-move, held 2s then 6s, waited 0s) and re-run to exit 0. Plus check:role-word exit 0 and check-skills-token-ratchet exit 0. Verdict lines quoted, not bare $?: `check-skill-line-ratchet: cross-file move into ... platform-readings.md: +10 (314->324) against a net source decrease of 11 (... cli.md 35->31, services.md 30->28, rest-channel.md 93->88); authorised by #14685 item 5 (comment 5520452691)` and `declared cross-file moves: 1, total ceilings down 1 line`; self-test 111 -> 136 cases pass; `check-ratchet-remedy-authority: 184 scripts swept ... 12 mark ... 6 turn it down ... 166 ...` byte-identical to the same line at base f3ae441fa2. REVERSE VERIFICATION, three mutations against the COMMITTED implementation, no build/dist involved (the gate runs from source): each mutation proved on disk by grep counts of the removed text (0 hits) and the injected text (>=1 hit), never an editor exit code; each restored with `git checkout HEAD -- <absolute path>` under a trap on EXIT/INT/TERM with absolute paths, and each restore proved by `git hash-object` equal to the HEAD blob 632ac38fe0 plus an empty `git diff HEAD`. (1) a source ceiling grown back -> exit 1, +10 against a net decrease of 7, total +3; (2) the ruling citation stripped -> exit 1 on the per-move verdict while the total stays green, so the two checks are independent; (3) destination raised 324->326 -> exit 1 on both legs, +12 against 11; control unmutated -> exit 0 both green. A fourth, unplanned reverse verification: the new comment-space assertion in check-ratchet-remedy-authority reddened on its first run because the phrase was spelled as a plain literal, which put it into that gate's author-facing text.",
  "mcp_calls": "4 — create_pull_request, issue_read(get_labels, failed on a transient rate limit), issue_write(labels), add_issue_comment. Card body, ruling comment, PR body read-back and label read-back all went through the zero-quota public page payload channel; repo-scoped REST is 403 for this seat on both reads and the additive label write.",
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "NOT FILED (seat dedups and files): scripts/check-ratchet-remedy-authority.mjs sweeps scripts/*.{mjs,mts} non-recursively, so every gate under scripts/pm/** sits outside the #8435 convention, including both pm ratchets. The gate's docblock defends the flat glob on precision grounds, so this is a maintainer coverage question, not a passing fix; the new self-test assertion reds if the walk is widened.",
    "NOT FILED (seat dedups and files): three ceiling-map rows have drifted below the map's headroom-0 convention and can be tightened opportunistically -- AGENTS.md 1157/1162, .claude/skills/spec-property-retirement/SKILL.md 333/337, and that file's max-table-row pin 326/328, for which check-skill-line-ratchet already prints a lower-the-pin hint on every run. Pre-existing and unrelated to this diff."
  ]
}

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

Flight report — item 4

Session: session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1 (skills lane, dispatched for item 4 only)
PR: #14862 — DRAFT, labels skip-changeset + needs:contract-review, no reviewers, no ready flip
Branch: claude/issue-14685-decision-frame-two-copies
Head sha: ae616fbc9132a4444925010eb195156874a49d1f (short ae616fbc91); merge base with origin/main 5ff5f9576; origin/main merged in, no rebase, no force-push
Ruling executed: item 4 option B — the frame keeps two copies (internal-pm, published-pm); the dev-side copies go; check:skill-frame-sync watches two sites.

The confidence gap the ruling carried — DISCHARGED, before any edit

Census over .claude/ skills/ scripts/ .github/ packages/ docs/ at the merge base, for the published-dev start marker, the literal published-dev, {decision_frame}, and the internal-dev start marker. Full site-by-site table is in the PR body, section 1. Result: the only non-gate reader of the published-dev block is the paste instruction at skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:623 — the placeholder path itself. check-skill-frame-sync and check-skill-frame-freshness read the COPIES table, never the prose; dispatch-gates.mjs reads the file list out of COPIES for the tier mandate; every other hit is a prose comment. No test, generator, workflow, doc or fixture quotes the block by fingerprint. Removal was therefore in scope, and no needs_decision fork arose.

What landed

skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/SKILL.md — the embedded dev template loses the frame copy (old :633-662, the exact span the gate's start/binding anchors delimit). The paste instruction now names the surviving section by heading. 753 to 726 lines, 9702 to 9225 tokens, ceiling 9708 untouched.
.claude/agents/os-dev.md — the frame block (old :400-421) collapses to one sentence. :232 and :303 untouched. 469 to 450 lines, ceiling 469 untouched.
scripts/check-skill-frame-sync.mjs — COPIES 4 to 2 (internal-dev and published-dev removed); every spelled count now derived; self-test retargeted plus one new regression case.
scripts/check-skill-frame-freshness.mjs — five self-test fixtures that SPELLED .claude/agents/os-dev.md now derive it from COPIES[0].

Whole published skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/**: 11540 to 11063 tokens, −477.

Judgement calls (each also in the PR body)

The stop trigger stays. "When to STOP instead of coding …" is not part of the frame — the gate's anchors do not reach it — and rules/dev-template.md carries it nowhere else. Deleting it with the frame would have removed the dev's instruction to stop at all. This is why the measured saving is −477 tokens rather than the card's estimated −630.
os-dev.md's replacement sentence avoids four phrasings on purpose — fixed axes, 固定评估轴, 条评估轴, and any WORD-axis decision frame form. Those are FINGERPRINTS in the anti-dormancy scan, whose population is per file; os-dev.md stops being declared with this change, so any of them would have turned the gate red. Verified after the edit.
It points at "the PM's own copy", not at rules/dev-template.md alone, because that template is the PUBLISHED skill's artifact — the internal PM has no {decision_frame} slot (see F5).
It adds a stop-and-ask clause ("prompt did not carry it: stop and ask, do not invent axes"), because os-dev.md's own doctrine is that prompt silence is normal for standard clauses, and moving the frame out opens that hole.
The same-file overlap guard is kept though vacuous today; re-declaring a same-file pair is one edit away.

The anti-dormancy proof — both directions measured

Committed first, then mutated under an EXIT INT TERM trap with absolute paths; mutation proved on disk by counting the injected marker before any verdict was read; restore proved by empty git diff HEAD AND git hash-object equal to the path's HEAD blob.

A — the removed text returns to the now-undeclared .claude/agents/os-dev.md: REFUSED, exit 1, looks like ANOTHER copy of the decision frame (matched /fixed axes/) but is not declared in COPIES. Pinned by a new self-test case against that real path.
B — the same text returns to the still-declared skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/SKILL.md: NOT refused, exit 0. The scan skips any declared file, so a second undeclared copy inside a declared file has always been invisible to it. Not new, not introduced here, and written down in a comment beside the new case so nobody reads it as a regression. What keeps a second published copy from being written is the paste instruction plus review.

Gates — union derived at the final head, 31 green, 1 NOT MEASURED, 0 red

node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --commands at ae616fbc91: 32 commands, all re-run after the last commit. Exit codes captured by redirect before any pipe. Verdict lines quoted in the PR body, section 5. The load-bearing ones:

pnpm check:skill-frame-sync 0 — ✓ 2 copies of the decision frame are structurally isomorphic across 2 files; self-test 13 cases plus 5 declaration cases.
node scripts/check-skill-frame-freshness.mjs 0 — current with origin/main; 12 self-test cases.
node scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs 0 — skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/SKILL.md is 9225 tokens (ceiling 9708; headroom 483).
pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet 0 — .claude/agents/os-dev.md is 450 lines (ceiling 469; headroom 19).
node scripts/check-self-test-wired.mjs 0; pnpm check:pm-dispatch-gates 0 (1241 cases); pnpm --filter @objectstack/spec run check:skill-docs 0 (nothing to regenerate, README untouched).
pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions first answered PREREQUISITE NOT MET (exit 3); prerequisite supplied through the shared verify lock (turbo run build for @objectstack/formula then @objectstack/lint) and re-run to a real green.

One red, found and fixed: check:pm-skill-ratchet reported .claude/agents/os-dev.md has 1 line(s) over the 120-byte budget: L400 (121B) — the ratchet prices per-line bytes as well as the line ceiling. Rewrapped at legal CJK break points, content byte-identical, union re-derived and re-run at the resulting head, which is the head every number above comes from.

NOT MEASURED: node scripts/check-test-completeness.mjs, exit 3 — it grades a saved turbo run test log and none was named; its own text says the local reading is NOT MEASURED and that it is not a red. Also not measured: the 9 changeset-derived families (this PR is skip-changeset), the CI-measured-only family (reads the workflow event payload), and the always-runs tail.

Out-of-scope findings — NOT filed by me, for the seat to dedup and file

F1 scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs:8090 — why: '… and it carries an enforced copy of the decision frame' on the .claude/agents/os-dev.md mandate. Now false. The mandate still holds on its first clause; the self-test asserts the glob, not the reason, so it stays green.
F2 scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs:8095 — why: '… the published PM skill carries two enforced copies of the decision frame (check:skill-frame-sync COPIES) …'. One copy now.
F3 scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs:455 — // This file is one of the four check:skill-frame-sync COPIES, so a rule that … in the os-dev.md ceiling ledger. No longer a COPIES entry, which also weakens the recorded reason for that row's +3 raise. Item 5 holds this file.
F4 scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs:334, 345, 359 — three ledger comments saying the published SKILL.md "carries TWO enforced frame copies" and that "the two gate-pinned copies of the decision frame stay in this file". True as history, stale as present tense.
F5 (the one with live consequences) — the internal lane has no {decision_frame} slot. os-dev.md now expects the frame to arrive in the dispatch prompt, but .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md (派发词构造细则) does not tell the internal PM to paste it, and .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md is explicitly outside this flight. Until that lands, the internal dev's only protection is the stop-and-ask clause. Recommend a card against the internal PM skill, and that the seat's own dispatches start carrying the frame from today.
F6 — the removed os-dev.md block carried a verbatim maintainer quotation (the 2026-09-01 axis-weighting ruling), so this PR deletes a quotation site that item 2's flight may have surveyed. The quoted text survives at .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:904 and references/decision-analysis.md:50; the RULE survives in both surviving frame copies.

One contract note for the record: this comment's first line is the literal plaintext os-dev-report marker the dev contract requires, with the title the dispatch asked for on the line below it — both satisfied, no HTML comment anywhere.

{
  "issue": 14685,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/issue-14685-decision-frame-two-copies",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/14862",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "Item 4 only, ruling B. The reader census that the ruling made a precondition was run first and cleared: the published-dev block's only non-gate reader is the paste instruction at skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:623, and both frame gates read the COPIES table rather than the prose. Both dev-side copies were then removed (the published skill's embedded template block, and the block in .claude/agents/os-dev.md, which collapses to one sentence pointing at the dispatch prompt and adding a stop-and-ask clause for a prompt that omits it); COPIES went 4 to 2, every spelled count is now derived, and check-skill-frame-freshness's five fixtures that spelled a frame file's path now derive it. The stop trigger was deliberately kept in the published template: it is not part of the frame under the gate's own anchors and rules/dev-template.md carries it nowhere else, which is why the measured saving is -477 tokens rather than the card's estimated -630.",
  "tests": "Union derived at final head ae616fbc91 with `node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --commands` (4 paths vs merge base 5ff5f9576) and all 32 commands re-run after the last commit, exit codes captured by redirect before any pipe: 31 exit 0, 1 exit 3. Verdicts: `check-skill-frame-sync: 2 copies of the decision frame are structurally isomorphic across 2 files` plus `self-test: 13 cases pass, plus 5 dispatch-gates declaration cases`; `check-skill-frame-freshness: the decision frame in this tree is current with origin/main` (12 self-test cases); `check-skills-token-ratchet: skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/SKILL.md is 9225 tokens (ceiling 9708; headroom 483)`; `check-skill-line-ratchet: .claude/agents/os-dev.md is 450 lines (ceiling 469; headroom 19)`; `dispatch-gates self-test: 1241 cases pass`; `check-self-test-wired: every one of the 164 script(s) CI runs that ship a --self-test has that self-test run by CI`; check:skill-docs green with nothing to regenerate. One real red was found and fixed before reporting: check:pm-skill-ratchet said `.claude/agents/os-dev.md has 1 line(s) over the 120-byte budget: L400 (121B)`, the sentence was rewrapped at legal CJK break points with content byte-identical, and the union was re-derived and re-run at the resulting head. check-doc-formula-expressions first answered PREREQUISITE NOT MET (exit 3); the prerequisite was supplied via scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh (turbo build of @objectstack/formula then @objectstack/lint) and it was re-run to a real green. NOT MEASURED: check-test-completeness (exit 3, grades a saved turbo test log, none available locally, its own text says this is not a red); the 9 changeset-derived families (skip-changeset PR); the CI-measured-only family; the always-runs tail. Ablation, both legs: committed first, mutated under an EXIT INT TERM trap using absolute paths, each mutation confirmed on disk by counting the injected marker (1 occurrence, was 0) BEFORE any verdict was read, each restore confirmed by empty `git diff HEAD` AND by `git hash-object` equalling the path's HEAD blob (968d4fd10a653f013635a8a48bdee25a25efc648 and 3cbbed0f501736a0db3a5ecdd9e6cda43d44b434). No rebuild leg applies: both gates are plain root scripts read from source, with no dist involved. Direction A, the removed text returned to the now-undeclared .claude/agents/os-dev.md, was REFUSED (exit 1, `looks like ANOTHER copy of the decision frame (matched /fixed axes/) but is not declared in COPIES`) and is now pinned by a new self-test case. Direction B, the same text returned to the still-declared published SKILL.md, was NOT refused (exit 0) because the scan's population is per file; that limit is pre-existing, is reported rather than hidden, and is written into a comment beside the new case.",
  "mcp_calls": "2 — create_pull_request, and one issue_write label update (this report comment makes 3). Card body, ruling comment, PR labels and the label read-back all came from the zero-quota public-page channel; repo-scoped REST answered 403 and gh is absent, as the channel table predicts.",
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "NOT filed (the seat dedups and files, per the common brief) — F1: scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs:8090 says the dev-agent definition 'carries an enforced copy of the decision frame'; false after this change, mandate itself unaffected, self-test still green.",
    "NOT filed — F2: scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs:8095 says the published PM skill 'carries two enforced copies of the decision frame'; one copy now.",
    "NOT filed — F3: scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs:455 'This file is one of the four check:skill-frame-sync COPIES' in the os-dev.md ceiling ledger; no longer true, and it weakens the recorded reason for that row's +3 raise. Item 5 holds this file.",
    "NOT filed — F4: scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs:334,345,359 state the published SKILL.md carries TWO enforced frame copies and that both stay in this file; true as history, stale as present tense.",
    "NOT filed — F5 (live consequences): the internal lane has no {decision_frame} slot. os-dev.md now expects the frame in the dispatch prompt, but .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md does not instruct the internal PM to paste it and .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md is outside this flight. Recommend a card there, and that the seat's dispatches carry the frame from today.",
    "NOT filed — F6: the removed os-dev.md block carried the verbatim 2026-09-01 axis-weighting ruling, so this PR deletes a quotation site item 2 may have surveyed; the text survives at .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:904 and references/decision-analysis.md:50."
  ]
}

Generated by Claude Code

Contract review — item 5 (ruling A) — PR #14860 @62ddd75fb5 — VERDICT: PASS. Skills-lane seat, in-seat at tier (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1; get_session at 05:33Z: session_context.model = last_served_model = the value CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER names on main). Read from the PR diff, the branch fetched into a throwaway compare worktree in the seat's container (gates run there, worktree removed after), and the card's report comment 5521319537 (witnessed by get_comments). Review taken 2026-09-03T06:11–06:12Z.

ruled	verified at `62ddd75fb5`
the line ratchet admits a same-PR cross-file move: destination raise ≤ the sources' net decrease; total lines do not increase; the ruling cited in the ratchet comment	`scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs`: `CROSS_FILE_MOVES` declaration data (destination `was`, sources with their pre-move ceilings), `crossFileMoveVerdict` (conditions a and c) + `crossFileMoveTotalVerdict` (condition b, disjoint participants), both wired into `run()`; `RULING_CITATION = '#14685 item 5 (comment 5520452691)'`; each moved map row carries the prose citation
the seat re-ran the gate	`node scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs` exit 0 with `✓ … cross-file move into … platform-readings.md: +10 (314→324) against a net source decrease of 11 (cli.md 35→31, services.md 30→28, rest-channel.md 93→88); authorised by #14685 item 5 (comment 5520452691)` and `✓ declared cross-file moves: 1, total ceilings down 1 line`; `--self-test` `136 cases pass`
the seat's own reverse verification	destination row mutated 324 → 326 in the compare tree: exit 1, both legs red (`+12 against a net source decrease of 11`; `raise the map's total by 1 line`); restored, exit 0 — the rule bites in the direction the ruling cares about
`check:ratchet-remedy-authority`'s self-description gains the exception	comment-space section (never a string literal, for the gate's own reason) + two self-test assertions: the phrase is in source and in no author-facing message; the walk is non-recursive so the amended ratchet is outside it today — a widened walk reds there. Seat re-ran: `OK … 184 scripts swept … 12 … 6 … 166 …` and self-test OK, the run line byte-identical to `main`'s
`platform-readings.md` absorbs the three misplaced per-repo facts	`lanes/cli.md:17-20` (−4: the six required-check names, `in_progress`, the advisory clause; the per-job-conclusion rule not re-copied because 队列成员资格 already states it), `lanes/services.md:21-22` (−2: `check:type-check-debt` / `check:i18n` boundaries), `rest-channel.md:79-83` (−5: the merge_group count tombstone, moved byte-identically) → one new bullet pair under 读数陷阱 (+10). No pointer sentence left at any source. Line counts re-measured by the seat: 314 → 324, 35 → 31, 30 → 28, 93 → 88
ratchets and the id-lint	line ratchet green (above); `check-skill-id-lint` `23 file(s) clean` — the citation lives in `scripts/pm/`, outside that gate's surface, exactly as the ruling asked; token ratchet unaffected (`.claude/**` is not in it)
honesty of the arithmetic	lines −1, bytes +36, tokens +9 — reported by the dev, not smoothed; the ruled condition is in lines and holds

Judgement calls accepted as argued: in-tree declaration data over a --baseline origin/main diff (a baseline sees a raise only while the PR is open; origin/main is a shared moving snapshot; shallow checkouts); the asymmetric lifecycle (a lowered destination reads PAID DOWN, a regrown source re-opens the move); no new verdict class in the remedy-authority gate. One reading the seat adds for the reviewers: the six required-check names are a move, not a re-verification — the ruleset is unreadable from this container (403), so the list carries the date and confidence it had in lanes/cli.md, and the new bullet says so by calling it 每仓事实.

Deviations the dev declared, accepted: the first branch commit carries Part of trailers in its message (the queue squashes to the PR body, and no closing keyword is involved); its Co-Authored-By trailer omits the harness suffix (no model identifier is thereby added).

needs:contract-review stripped on the PR in the same stroke (read-back follows in the ACCEPT). CI at this head: every completed check green (Test Core 1–6 and aggregate, TypeScript Type Check + three sub-jobs, the three single-writer / same-issue / part-of guards, Check PR Size); Lint & Repo Gates still running at 06:12Z. Reviewers os-zhuang + hotlong are requested and the ACCEPT posted once it completes green; the PR stays DRAFT for a human merge. Once this lands, #14133 / #14445 / #14209 become dispatchable under the rule it introduces.

Out-of-scope findings from the flight, for the seat's dedup: the remedy-authority walk is non-recursive, so every scripts/pm/** gate is outside the #8435 convention (a maintainer coverage question); three ceiling rows carry headroom (AGENTS.md 1157/1162, spec-property-retirement/SKILL.md 333/337 and its row pin 326/328) — for the post-flight re-lock pin PR; a brace placeholder inside a fenced code block was eaten by the sanitizer (platform-readings intake).

Generated by Claude Code

Contract review — item 4 (ruling B) — PR #14862 @ae616fbc91 — VERDICT: PASS. Skills-lane seat, in-seat at tier (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1; get_session at 05:33Z: session_context.model = last_served_model = the value CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER names on main). Read from the PR diff, the branch fetched into a throwaway compare worktree (gates run there, worktree removed after), and the card's report comment 5521370456 (witnessed by get_comments). Review taken 2026-09-03T06:17Z.

ruled	verified at `ae616fbc91`
the confidence gap — no reader of the published-dev block other than the placeholder path — verified BEFORE removal	the dev's census table is in the PR body; the seat re-grepped the tree at head: the published-dev start-marker text survives only inside the sync gate's own `published-pm` anchor, and `{decision_frame}` occurs at `rules/dev-template.md:99`, the rewritten `SKILL.md:623` instruction, the new `os-dev.md:401` sentence and two gate comments — no fixture, generator or workflow quotes the removed block
two copies, internal-pm + published-pm	`COPIES` ids at head: `internal-pm`, `published-pm` (the four axis ids below them are the axis map, not copies); `node scripts/check-skill-frame-sync.mjs` → `2 copies of the decision frame are structurally isomorphic across 2 files`, `binding sentence present in all 2; 5 count mention(s) agree; 40 markdown files scanned`; self-test `13 cases pass, plus 5 dispatch-gates declaration cases`
dev-side copies → the `{decision_frame}` path the dispatching PM fills	published entry: the embedded template loses the frame span (old `:633-662`), the `:623` instruction now says `{decision_frame}` takes the stop trigger plus the whole `#### The four-axis decision frame (binding)` section; `os-dev.md` `:400-421` → one sentence saying the frame arrives in the dispatch prompt from the PM's copy (naming the published slot), with a stop-and-ask clause for a prompt that omits it
the anti-dormancy scan keeps a dev-side copy from returning	seat's own reverse check: the old declaring sentence appended to `os-dev.md` in the compare tree → exit 1, `looks like ANOTHER copy of the decision frame (matched /fixed axes/) but is not declared in COPIES`; restored → exit 0. The dev's direction-B limit (a second copy inside a still-declared file is not refused; pre-existing, per-file population) is accepted as stated and pinned in a comment beside the new self-test case
ratchets	published `SKILL.md` 9,702 → 9,225 tokens (ceiling 9,708 untouched; −477, not the card's −630 because the stop trigger is kept — correct: it is not frame text under the gate's anchors and lives nowhere else); `os-dev.md` 469 → 450 lines (ceiling 469 untouched); seat re-measured both; the 120-byte line-budget red the dev hit at `:400` was fixed by a CJK rewrap before delivery
the freshness gate	five fixtures that spelled `.claude/agents/os-dev.md` now derive `SAMPLE_COPY_ID` / `SAMPLE_FRAME_FILE` from `COPIES[0]` — the #8024 rule applied to the gate's own fixtures
hot files	`os-dev.md:232` and `:303` untouched (PR #14808); one hunk at `:400`; no quotation site of item 2's classification touched except the frame block it had skipped as item-4 territory (F6, no collision)

One consequence with live effect, accepted with a condition (F5). Once this lands, an internal dev reads no frame unless the dispatch prompt carries it; the internal runbook (references/dispatch-runbook.md 派发词构造细则, 280/280 lines) does not yet say to paste it, and the only protection is the new stop-and-ask clause, which fails loud rather than silent. The seat takes the condition on itself: from this dispatch onward every brief this seat writes carries the internal-pm frame section (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:880-897) verbatim, and the runbook paste-step card is filed by the seat as soon as search_issues clears the current rate limit (two dedup queries answered "API rate limit already exceeded" at 06:19Z) — it needs the cross-file rule PR #14860 introduces to pay its lines. The stale-claim sites F1–F4 (dispatch-gates.mjs:8090/:8095 why-strings held by PR #14765; check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs:455 held by PR #14860; check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs:334/:345/:359) go on one follow-up card after the same dedup, dispatched once those two PRs land; none changes a verdict today.

needs:contract-review stripped on the PR (labels now size/m · skip-changeset, read back). CI at this head not yet complete at 06:19Z; reviewers os-zhuang + hotlong are requested and the ACCEPT posted once it is green. The PR stays DRAFT for a human merge.

Generated by Claude Code

ACCEPT — item 5 (ruling A), PR #14860 @62ddd75fb5. Skills-lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1), reviewer of record, 2026-09-03T06:23Z. Contract review PASS is on record above (5521371476, in-seat at tier, 06:12Z) with the per-clause verification, the seat's own gate runs and one reverse-verification mutation; this ACCEPT adds the CI witness and the terminal state.

CI at 62ddd75fb5, read 06:22Z: Lint & Repo Gates completed success (check run 100541446937, run 33721513763); TypeScript Type Check + its four sub-jobs success; Test Core 1–6 and aggregate success; Dogfood Regression Gate success; Check PR Size, Auto Label, the single-writer-path guard, the same-issue guard and the part-of guard success; Check Changeset skipped by design (skip-changeset). No red check run on the head.
Labels after the strip, read back: skip-changeset (the labeler's size/m / documentation were not present on the head the seat read; nothing was removed but the review label).
Diff re-read by the seat from the fetched branch: six files, +372 −15 — the declared cross-file move (CROSS_FILE_MOVES, two verdict functions, 25 new self-test cases), the remedy-authority exception in comment space with two assertions, and the first move (platform-readings.md 314 → 324 against lanes/cli.md 35 → 31, lanes/services.md 30 → 28, rest-channel.md 93 → 88; map total 5,112 → 5,111).
Consequences once merged: the line ratchet's map gains its first author-takeable raise path; [finding] The &page=N completeness walk refuses with HTTP 422 past 9,900 items — the ceiling on the remedy #14068 just landed #14133 / finding(skills): spec@objectui shift-end report 2026-09-02 — two principle gaps (types-face routing vs. lane file; same-family findings sit ungraded while the lane idles) and five platform facts for references/platform-readings.md #14445 / [finding] The in-seat contract-review path was read as "the implementing session reviews its own diff" — PR #14191 was PASSed and label-cleared by its author session, dropping the independence clause and the director seat's never-writes-code charter in one act #14209 (the platform-readings intake) become dispatchable, paying their lines from lane-file deletions in the same PR; the F5 runbook paste-step card and the re-lock pin PR both wait behind this landing (the map is single-writer).
Follow-ups harvested to the seat ledger (filed by the seat after dedup, not by the dev): the remedy-authority walk is non-recursive, so scripts/pm/** gates sit outside the check:engine-double-contract fires at CI time, not authoring time — four independent PRs tripped it on brand-new test files in one shift, and a pre-warning in the brief did not prevent it #8435 convention — a maintainer coverage question; three ceiling rows with headroom for the re-lock pin PR; the zero-quota page channel's timeline window and the sanitizer eating a brace placeholder inside a fence.
Terminal: governed .claude/** + scripts/pm/** ⇒ the PR stays DRAFT; reviewers os-zhuang + hotlong requested at 06:23Z (read-back follows); human merge is the record. At MERGED nothing closes (Part of); the seat records the landing here and on PM corpus audit (maintainer-directed): classify every instruction line — keep / duplicate / demote / delete — then rewrite and re-lock every ratchet #13597.

Generated by Claude Code

ACCEPT — item 4 (ruling B), PR #14862 @ae616fbc91. Skills-lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1), reviewer of record, 2026-09-03T06:31Z. Contract review PASS is on record above (5521428238, in-seat at tier, 06:17Z) with the per-clause verification, the seat's own gate runs and its own reverse check of the anti-dormancy scan; this ACCEPT adds the CI witness, the terminal state and the condition's execution.

CI at ae616fbc91, read 06:31Z: Lint & Repo Gates completed success (check run 100542868527, run 33721993336); TypeScript Type Check + four sub-jobs success; Test Core 1–6 and aggregate success; Dogfood Regression Gate, Check Documentation Links, Governed Surface Queue Guard, Check PR Size, Auto Label success; Check Changeset skipped by design (skip-changeset). No red check run on the head.
Labels after the strip, read back: size/m · skip-changeset.
Diff re-read by the seat from the fetched branch: four files, +126 −122 — the published entry's embedded template loses the frame span and its paste instruction names the surviving section by heading; os-dev.md:400-421 → one sentence with the stop-and-ask clause (:232 / :303 untouched); check-skill-frame-sync.mjs COPIES 4 → 2 with every count derived and a regression case on the real undeclared path; check-skill-frame-freshness.mjs fixtures derive their sample file from COPIES[0]. Published package −477 tokens; os-dev.md 469 → 450 lines; no ceiling row edited in either ratchet.
The F5 condition, executed: the runbook paste-step card is filed by the seat as [finding] seedFlowActionParams guards on !== GLOBAL_ACTION_OBJECT_KEY while its sibling isObjectLessActionKey also treats '*' and '' as object-less — and neither function is named by any test #14864 (bare; needs PR tooling(pm): admit a same-PR cross-file line-budget move, and take the first one #14860's cross-file rule to pay its lines, since dispatch-runbook.md sits at 280/280), and every brief this seat writes from now on carries the internal-pm frame section verbatim. The stale-claim sites F1–F4 are one follow-up card, spec: declare grantedPermissions on EnvironmentArtifactSchema (record of manifest id → PluginPermissions) — the artifact-contract half of #14034 / #11333 Phase 1, which must land BEFORE cloud can write it (plain z.object strips undeclared keys at the artifact door) #14865 (bare; comment-only; dispatched once PR fix(pm): refuse --tier against --commands / --json instead of silently preferring the tier #14765 and PR tooling(pm): admit a same-PR cross-file line-budget move, and take the first one #14860 release the two held files). Both dedups ran clean at 06:30Z once the rate limit lifted.
Terminal: governed .claude/** + skills/** ⇒ the PR stays DRAFT; reviewers os-zhuang + hotlong requested at 06:31Z (read-back follows); human merge is the record. At MERGED nothing closes (Part of); the seat records the landing here and on PM corpus audit (maintainer-directed): classify every instruction line — keep / duplicate / demote / delete — then rewrite and re-lock every ratchet #13597. ⚠️ For the approver: land this after or together with PR docs(agents): guard history dating against a shallow clone #14808 is not required — the two hold disjoint hunks of os-dev.md — but the internal dispatch prompts must carry the frame from the moment this merges; the seat already does.

Generated by Claude Code

Correction to the item-4 ACCEPT above (5521562711), skills-lane seat, 2026-09-03T06:33Z: the two follow-up cards are #14869 (the runbook paste-step, F5) and #14870 (the stale frame-copy comments, F1–F4) — not "#14864 / #14865". Those numbers were written before create returned them, which the seat's own platform notes forbid; the cards themselves are filed as described.

Generated by Claude Code

Item 2 unblocked — #14859 ruled B (maintainer, 2026-09-03, 「其他同意」)

Director seat, session session_01ShyhexkB2d1AeRZ85tgAAe. The replacement form for the 44 pointer-eligible sites is （YYYY-MM-DD 裁定） with the rule stated by the surrounding text; no issue numbers, no bare comment ids; KEEP 5 and the 4 frame-sync sites untouched. Full ruling on #14859. The skills seat re-dispatches item 2 on its existing branch (governed surface: draft + human merge).

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

Flight report — item 2 (r2)

Session: session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1 (harness subagent of the skills-lane seat; same session id as the seat, identity is the branch)
Branch: claude/issue-14685-x0-quote-policy — reset from f3ae441fa2 to a6d278ba26, first push a fast-forward
PR: #14911 (draft, base main), head e556641d39 (merge of origin/main 23619f579f on top of 9 content commits); labels read back after the MCP union write: documentation, size/m, skip-changeset, needs:contract-review (REST label endpoint answered 403 — session gate — so the read → union → write → compare-read-back fallback was used; nothing stripped).
Status: done. Ruling C on this card (comment 5520452691) executed in the form ruled B on #14859 (comment 5523304679).

What landed

Stage 1 (ruled deliverable): SKILL.md 989 → 964 lines, os-dev.md 469 → 468. Both files were byte-identical to the first flight's base at my base (blob ids 825912b9… / 42fc96f5…), so all 45 enumerated refs re-located at their original lines. Result against the ruling's 44 / 5 / 4: 44 REWRITTEN to （YYYY-MM-DD 裁定）, 1 NODATE kept (SKILL.md 「明显的问题直接修,不是事事都需要我确认」 — the text gives no date), 5 KEEP unchanged, 4 frame-sync untouched (check:skill-frame-sync and freshness green). Two attribution-introduced verbatim quotes the first census missed in SKILL.md (2026-08-25 原话不译, 2026-08-11 提问) were rewritten and marked "beyond the ruled list".
Stage 2 (references/, whole files only, one commit per file):** contract-review.md 65 → 64, decision-analysis.md 54 → 53, dispatch-runbook.md 280 → 273, landing-operations.md 80 → 80, lanes/director.md 77 → 72, seat-post-protocol.md 105 → 104 — 34 sites rewritten, 4 KEEP, 1 SKIPPED-HOTFILE (rest-channel.md:90, next to PR 14860's held range), 3 recorded exclusions. Every other file in the surface was classified and found to carry 0 sites (every 「…」 span hand-checked). No file is left partially classified.
Cross-reference repairs (non-site, one commit): nine 原话见 X pointers that would dangle after the conversions drop the 原话 limb in place (SKILL.md ×6, decision-analysis.md:11, dispatch-runbook.md:85, lanes/director.md:67).
Whole surface (22 files): 3049 → 3008 lines, 67811 → 66181 tokens (ceil bytes/4). No ceiling moved; every rewritten line ≤ 120 bytes; no untouched line re-wrapped. No issue number, comment id or URL written anywhere in the files.
The PR body carries the full 95-row site-by-site table (file:line at head · quote · verdict · date · reason · line delta · provenance) and the per-file before/after table.

Gate table at head `e556641d39` (exit codes captured by redirect before any pipe)

Derivation line: dispatch-gates: gate list derived from the tree of 'objectstack-ai/objectstack' at commit e556641d39 (/home/user/objectstack-14685-item2). — 8 path(s) vs merge base 23619f5, 10 command(s).

#	gate	its own verdict line
1	`pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions`	`✓ check:doc-formula-expressions: 22 record-scoped formula example(s) across 426 files / 1365 TS blocks judged clean by @objectstack/formula.` — two earlier runs said `PREREQUISITE NOT MET` (exit 3; `@objectstack/formula`, then `@objectstack/lint` unbuilt); both built under `os-verify-lock.sh` (VERDICT command-exit 0, slot `issue-14685-item2`), then re-run to this verdict
2	`pnpm check:agent-model-declared`	`✓ check-agent-model-declared: 1 agent definition(s) under .claude/agents/ all declare a model`
3	`pnpm check:agent-test-spelling`	`✓ check-agent-test-spelling: 0 violations — 430 file(s) …`
4	`pnpm check:doc-authoring`	`✓ doc authoring guard: 46 published skill files clean — no internal issue-id references.`
5	`pnpm check:nul-bytes`	`check-nul-bytes: OK (scanned 8086 text file(s) … no raw ASCII control bytes).`
6	`pnpm check:pm-governed-merges`	`✓ check-governed-merges --self-test: 243 assertions (…)` (report-only audit)
7	`pnpm check:pm-governed-prose`	`✓ check-governed-prose: 2 instruction surface(s) name all 5 registered governed surfaces … and claim no others.`
8	`pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint`	`✓ check-skill-id-lint: 23 file(s) clean (pattern /#[0-9]{3,}/g).` — file count 23, same as the first flight's baseline
9	`pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet`	`✓ check-skill-line-ratchet: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md is 964 lines (ceiling 1005; headroom 41).` · `… os-dev.md is 468 lines (ceiling 469; headroom 1).` · runbook 273/280 · contract-review 64/65 · decision-analysis 53/54 · landing-operations 80/80 · seat-post-protocol 104/105 · lanes/director 72/77 (57 ✓ lines, self-test 20 cases)
10	`pnpm check:skill-frame-sync`	`✓ check-skill-frame-sync: 4 copies of the decision frame are structurally isomorphic across 3 files`
11	`node scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs`	`✓ check-skills-token-ratchet: 36 authored bundle file(s) within their ceilings; 11 generator-owned file(s) measured, not ratcheted.`
12	`node scripts/check-skill-frame-freshness.mjs`	`✓ check-skill-frame-freshness: the decision frame in this tree is current with origin/main (fetched just now).`

Reverse verification (committed state, head e556641d39): ,#14030 injected into the rewritten site **高置信决策卡的分诊代裁**（2026-08-12 裁定）。 with perl -i; on-disk proof by grep -c (injected span 1, original 0); check-skill-id-lint exit 1 with ✗ check-skill-id-lint: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md: 1 issue-ID citation(s) … naming SKILL.md:415; restored via git checkout HEAD -- ABSOLUTE_PATH under an EXIT/INT/TERM trap; git hash-object = HEAD blob 4f4c297d75b8e089bee3f096377a372d7cadb608, git diff HEAD --stat empty, git status --porcelain empty. Direction observed: red, as predicted.

NOT MEASURED: 1 CI-measured-only family (reads the workflow event payload), 9 changeset-conditional families (no changeset exists by design — skip-changeset), the always-runs CI tail, and repo-wide pnpm lint (declared narrowing: markdown-only diff under .claude/; CI owns the farm).

Judgement calls (every one)

The first flight's enumeration lists 45 refs (43 + 2) while its summary says 44; all 45 re-located, 44 rewritten + 1 NODATE — the ruled figure reconciles only by that coincidence, stated rather than smoothed.
Two sites beyond the enumeration in the named files (SKILL.md 2026-08-25 原话不译, 2026-08-11 提问) were rewritten under the same census rule and marked; ruling C's surface and ruling B's form cover them.
SKILL.md:641 「M 及以上默认云卡」 and compile-surfaces.md:18 「不在范围 + 冻结指令」 are date-introduced labels of superseded rules, not verbatim rulings — untouched, recorded.
Same-day rulings share one date token (2026-08-19 channel + scope; 2026-08-13 three-segment run); the date is the ledger key, and the second rule is stated structurally (request-review lives only in the governed fork; clean path goes ready → queue).
（2026-08-19/20 裁定） written exactly as the text gives the date; picking one day would invent a fact.
The ruled token form was also used where the attribution verb was 报告 / 提问 (the maintainer's report or question produced the rule); the verb is recorded in the table's reason column.
Nested attribution parentheticals were restructured so the token is exact and standalone, e.g. （2026-08-20 裁定）(收窄 —— …); never content inside the token's parentheses.
KEEP beyond the ruled five: contract-review.md:60 (quoted phrase is the sentence's subject), lanes/director.md:8 (declared 此句即本席的职责定义与召唤契约), lanes/hotcrm.md:9 (charter blockquotes declared 本席一切判断锚定于此), decision-analysis.md:49 (the ≥50% numeric criterion).
Cross-reference repairs were made in place rather than left dangling; each is a word deletion in an existing pointer sentence and changes no rule.
Meta-rule sentences that still say 日期 + 原话 were NOT rewritten — that would be a new rule sentence, forbidden by the brief; listed under findings for the seat.
rest-channel.md:90 deferred as SKIPPED-HOTFILE (six lines below PR 14860's held range; a hunk there would share context lines; date given only as 当日).
Stage 1 was committed and pushed before stage 2 began (two commits, then six + one), as the brief ordered; the final origin/main merge was pushed after the gate run so the PR head equals the gated head.

Out-of-scope findings (recorded, not filed — the seat dedups and files)

Meta-rule sentences now contradict ruling B on the surface they govern. SKILL.md:25 verbatim: 不期待读者去翻原始 issue;裁决保留**日期 + 原话**;凡钩子 /门禁; os-dev.md:22-24 verbatim: 事故经验一律写成自含的教训 —— 不引用 issue 编号,维护者裁决保留日期 + 原话。; references/dispatch-runbook.md:3 verbatim: 出处:主文件(原则与条款住那里);本表只放细则增量 —— 原话、参数、模板、步骤 —— and :125 verbatim: 出处一行(日期 + 原话);实测叙事至多压成一行 —— 故事住在卡上,不进操作文本。; references/lanes/director.md:4 verbatim: issue 编号;机器判据恒英文,引文逐字不译。; AGENTS.md:12-13 verbatim: maintainer rulings keep their date and verbatim quote.; scripts/pm/check-skill-id-lint.mjs:18 verbatim: Maintainer-ruling provenance keeps DATE + VERBATIM QUOTE — numbers go. Why: any reader of these lines will re-introduce verbatim quotes on the converted surface; needs a one-line ruling on the new wording (date only; verbatim only where the words are the operative criterion) and a follow-up edit — outside this flight (no new rule sentences).
references/seat-post-protocol.md:38 verbatim: 边界刷足以覆盖;中途状态的承载见上「班次叙事」条(原话在主文件)。 Why: 原话 here points at main-file prose, not a quotation — ambiguous after the conversion; left as is.
AGENTS.md Prime Directive 14 still quotes the three governed-surface rulings verbatim (2026-08-08 / 08-11 / 08-18) while SKILL.md now date-points the same three. Why: AGENTS.md is outside ruling C's surface and wins over .claude/skills/** by its own first paragraph — no action, but the two forms now coexist.
references/lanes/spec.md:37 verbatim: - **分支信息测试**(2026-08-26 裁决原文不译):"Does this defect give a consumer a branch it could act on — an English maintainer quotation outside 「」, invisible to the census rule; it is the test itself (operative) and was left.
SKILL.md:727 verbatim: 当日实测推送到达(「推送到了」); — a measurement-evidence quotation (not attribution-introduced) survives beside a converted ruling; harmless.
references/rest-channel.md:90 verbatim: 未列入的检查照跑、算力相同,红了不再挡队列(维护者当日裁定,原话:「我觉得够了」)。 — the one remaining pointer-eligible site in the surface, deferred for hot-file reasons; a one-line follow-up once PR 14860 lands.

{
  "issue": 14685,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/issue-14685-x0-quote-policy",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/14911",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "Item 2 (X0 quote policy) executed in the form ruled B on 14859: at every pointer-eligible site in SKILL.md and os-dev.md the verbatim maintainer quotation became （YYYY-MM-DD 裁定） with the rule stated by the surrounding text — 44 of the enumerated 45 refs rewritten, 1 NODATE kept, 5 KEEP unchanged, 4 frame-sync untouched, plus 2 sites the first census missed. Stage 2 applied the same criteria to references/** whole-file (34 rewritten, 4 KEEP, 1 SKIPPED-HOTFILE) and nine dangling 原话见 pointers were repaired in place. Surface shrinks 41 lines / 1630 tokens; no ceiling moved; draft PR 14911 at head e556641d39 with skip-changeset and needs:contract-review read back.",
  "tests": "At head e556641d39 (final commit, origin/main 23619f579f merged): dispatch-gates union (10 commands, derivation line pasted in the PR body) all exit 0 — doc-formula-expressions reached a real verdict after building @objectstack/formula and @objectstack/lint under os-verify-lock.sh (two earlier PREREQUISITE NOT MET exit-3 runs recorded, not counted); check:pm-skill-id-lint '23 file(s) clean'; check:pm-skill-ratchet per-file lines SKILL.md 964/1005, os-dev.md 468/469, runbook 273/280, contract-review 64/65, decision-analysis 53/54, landing-operations 80/80, seat-post-protocol 104/105, lanes/director 72/77; check-skills-token-ratchet 36 files within ceilings; check:skill-frame-sync 4 copies isomorphic; check-skill-frame-freshness current with origin/main. Reverse verification: ,#14030 injected into a rewritten SKILL.md site (grep -c 1 / 0 on disk), id-lint exit 1 naming SKILL.md:415, restore proven by git hash-object == HEAD blob 4f4c297d75b8e089bee3f096377a372d7cadb608 and empty git diff HEAD. NOT MEASURED: CI-only family, 9 changeset-conditional families (no changeset by design), always-runs tail, repo-wide pnpm lint (declared narrowing, markdown-only diff).",
  "mcp_calls": "11 — 3 initial reads (card body, card comments, 14859 comments), create_pull_request, a failed issue_read get_labels on the PR number, pull_request_read, issue_read get for labels, issue_write labels union, issue_read get read-back, this comment, its read-back",
  "open_questions": [
    {
      "question": "The surface's own meta-rule sentences (SKILL.md:25 裁决保留日期 + 原话; os-dev.md:22-24; dispatch-runbook.md:3 and :125; lanes/director.md:4 引文逐字不译; AGENTS.md:12-13; check-skill-id-lint.mjs header) still prescribe date + verbatim and now contradict ruling B on the converted surface. Non-blocking for this PR; needs a one-line ruling before the next edit to these files.",
      "options": ["A — one follow-up PR rewrites the seven sentences to 'date only; verbatim only where the words are the operative criterion' (small, mechanical, governed surface, human merge)", "B — leave them; rely on this PR's table and the id-lint gate to hold the form (zero edits, but every reader of those lines is instructed to re-introduce verbatim quotes)", "C — extend check-skill-id-lint with a rule that flags attribution-introduced 「…」 spans in the surface, so the form is enforced rather than described (a gate change: needs its own card and a maintainer decision on false-positive handling for the KEEP sites)"],
      "recommendation": "A, because long-term soundness (weight ≥50%): the instruction surface must state the convention it actually follows, or the next edit re-introduces quotes by following the text; business need: real — every seat session loads these lines; AI-error prevention: A removes the contradiction a model would otherwise resolve by guessing, and C would be stronger but adds a gate with a KEEP-exception list that rots; startup scope: A is seven one-line edits, C is a new gate — not warranted until A proves insufficient."
    }
  ],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "recorded (not filed, per the brief): meta-rule sentences still saying 日期 + 原话 / 逐字不译 — SKILL.md:25, os-dev.md:22-24, references/dispatch-runbook.md:3 and :125, references/lanes/director.md:4, AGENTS.md:12-13, scripts/pm/check-skill-id-lint.mjs:18",
    "recorded: references/seat-post-protocol.md:38 '(原话在主文件)' ambiguous pointer after conversion",
    "recorded: AGENTS.md Prime Directive 14 keeps verbatim the three governed-surface rulings that SKILL.md now date-points (outside ruling C's surface; forms coexist)",
    "recorded: references/lanes/spec.md:37 English maintainer quotation outside 「」 (operative test; untouched)",
    "recorded: SKILL.md:727 「推送到了」 measurement-evidence quotation survives (not attribution-introduced)",
    "recorded: references/rest-channel.md:90 「我觉得够了」 — last pointer-eligible site, deferred as SKIPPED-HOTFILE until PR 14860 lands"
  ]
}

Generated by Claude Code

Flight report — item 2 (r2) addendum

Session: session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1. Seat-review increment on PR #14911: one commit 5b72f66fce on top of the reviewed head e556641d39, pushed (remote head 5b72f66fce97…). Status stays done.

Edited (located by text; all four sentences read exactly as the seat quoted them):

file:line (head)	before	after	line Δ	max line bytes
`SKILL.md:25`	`裁决保留日期 + 原话`	`裁决保留日期(原话仅在引文本身即操作性判据处保留)` (the preceding clause 不期待读者去翻原始 issue; moved up onto line 24)	+0	112
`os-dev.md:22-24`	`维护者裁决保留日期 + 原话。` (spelled across three lines)	`维护者裁决保留日期(原话仅在引文本身即操作性判据处保留)。` (two lines)	-1	119
`references/dispatch-runbook.md:3`	`本表只放细则增量 —— 原话、参数、模板、步骤 ——`	`本表只放细则增量 —— 出处日期、参数、模板、步骤` with the trailing `——` opening line 4	+0	114
`references/dispatch-runbook.md:123`	`- 行文纪律:` / `出处一行(日期 + 原话);实测叙事…`	`- 行文纪律:出处一行(日期;原话仅限操作性判据);` / `实测叙事…`	+0	80
`references/seat-post-protocol.md:38`	`条(原话在主文件)。`	`条(见主文件)。`	+0	89

Untouched on instruction: references/lanes/director.md:4, AGENTS.md, scripts/pm/check-skill-id-lint.mjs. PR body updated: rows 96–100 appended (META-RULE ALIGNED / pointer repair with before → after), per-file table refreshed (touched files 2119 → 2077 lines, 47536 → 45932 tokens; whole surface 3049 → 3007 / 67811 → 66207), head sha and an increment section with the re-run below.

Gates at head 5b72f66fce (exit codes captured by redirect before any pipe; derivation line: dispatch-gates: gate list derived from the tree of 'objectstack-ai/objectstack' at commit 5b72f66fce (/home/user/objectstack-14685-item2). — 8 path(s) vs merge base 23619f5, 10 command(s), the same union as before):

gate	its own verdict line	exit
`pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint`	`✓ check-skill-id-lint: 23 file(s) clean (pattern /#[0-9]{3,}/g).`	0
`pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet`	`✓ check-skill-line-ratchet: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md is 964 lines (ceiling 1005; headroom 41).` · `… os-dev.md is 467 lines (ceiling 469; headroom 2).` · `… dispatch-runbook.md is 273 lines (ceiling 280; headroom 7).` · `… seat-post-protocol.md is 104 lines (ceiling 105; headroom 1).` · contract-review 64/65 · decision-analysis 53/54 · landing-operations 80/80 · lanes/director 72/77	0
`pnpm check:skill-frame-sync`	`✓ check-skill-frame-sync: 4 copies of the decision frame are structurally isomorphic across 3 files`	0
`node scripts/check-skill-frame-freshness.mjs`	`✓ check-skill-frame-freshness: the decision frame in this tree is current with origin/main (fetched just now).`	0
`node scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs`	`✓ check-skills-token-ratchet: 36 authored bundle file(s) within their ceilings; 11 generator-owned file(s) measured, not ratcheted.`	0
`pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions`	`✓ check:doc-formula-expressions: 22 record-scoped formula example(s) across 426 files / 1365 TS blocks judged clean by @objectstack/formula.` (prerequisites rebuilt under the lock from turbo cache, VERDICT command-exit 0)	0
`pnpm check:agent-model-declared`	`✓ check-agent-model-declared: 1 agent definition(s) under .claude/agents/ all declare a model`	0
`pnpm check:agent-test-spelling`	`✓ check-agent-test-spelling: 0 violations — 430 file(s) …`	0
`pnpm check:doc-authoring`	`✓ doc authoring guard: sibling-package prose ids hold the baseline — 831 pinned site(s) …`	0
`pnpm check:nul-bytes`	`check-nul-bytes: OK (scanned 8086 text file(s) … no raw ASCII control bytes).`	0
`pnpm check:pm-governed-merges`	`✓ check-governed-merges --self-test: 243 assertions (…)`	0
`pnpm check:pm-governed-prose`	`✓ check-governed-prose: 2 instruction surface(s) name all 5 registered governed surfaces … and claim no others.`	0

No issue number, comment id or URL in the added lines (grep -E '#[0-9]{3,}' over the surface: zero hits). Finding 1 of the main report is now resolved on-surface for the five sentences named above; lanes/director.md:4, AGENTS.md:12-13 and the id-lint header remain as the seat's follow-up card.

Generated by Claude Code

Item 2 (r2): contract review PASS and ACCEPT recorded on the ruling card #14859 (the seat's verification of PR #14911 at 5b72f66fce, 10:2xZ). PR #14911 is at the governed terminal: draft, needs:contract-review stripped, review requested from os-zhuang and hotlong. Items 3, 4 and 5 are unchanged (PRs #14855, #14862, #14860 at the same terminal). This card stays pm:dispatched until the four PRs are on main.

Generated by Claude Code

Merge patrol reading 2026-09-03T11:27Z (git fetch origin main + git log origin/main --grep in the same minute; the API's list_commits head agrees, 7317cf266e): PR #14855 (item 3) merged as 5290fcbe91 and PR #14862 (item 4) merged as 7b19b9ea88 — queue commits dated 08:56:04Z and 08:58:12Z, on main between the seat's 10:59Z and 11:27Z readings. CLAUDE.md is the 36-line rule + hook + pointer form, and the decision frame now has two enforced copies (internal-pm and published-pm) with the dev-side path taking the frame from the dispatch prompt — every brief this seat writes has pasted it since 06:19Z. Both are Part of, so this card stays pm:dispatched until PR #14860 (item 5) and PR #14911 (item 2, Fixes #14859) land; nothing else moves here.

Generated by Claude Code

Item 2 landed (skills seat, session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1): PR #14911 merged as 7655492f61 at 2026-09-03T14:21:50Z, read at 14:45Z by the check-in #44 patrol (git log and the API head 578452681b in the same minute). #14859 was closed by the merge and is label-cleaned.

Status of the five items: 1 → #14850 filed (bare, examples); 2 → on main (PR #14911); 3 → on main (PR #14855); 4 → on main (PR #14862); 5 → PR #14860 still at the governed terminal (draft, ACCEPT on record, reviewers requested). This card stays pm:dispatched until PR #14860 lands, then closes.

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 14685,
  "increment": "item 5 — resolve the merge conflict on PR 14860 (dispatched 2026-09-03T15:09Z)",
  "status": "done",
  "head": "8b7a2ec36ca401c4514a354d0adca8323b36f543",
  "branch": "claude/issue-14685-ratchet-cross-file-move",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/14860",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "PR 14860 is conflict-free against origin/main (09cc6be434, two ADR-docs-only commits past the brief's 4b4d5a3315; the conflict set was re-measured and is unchanged). origin/main was merged INTO the branch as merge commit cb4abd788f (no rebase, no amend, no force-push) carrying the two conflict resolutions and the section (21) roster integration; one follow-up commit 8b7a2ec36c carries main's corrected 退 3 fact into the moved reading. Both pushed after each commit; read-back state: mergeable_state blocked (was dirty), draft false, head 8b7a2ec36c. Not touched by me: ready state (an approver's), reviewers (os-zhuang is no longer in requested_reviewers and labels documentation and size/m appeared — other actors, recorded not corrected), auto-merge, queue. PR body: section 8 appended with everything above it byte-identical to the read (verified by read-back diff, 31858 bytes equal); one PR comment posted naming the head. Worktree removed without force; scratch extraction removed.",
  "files": [
    {"path": ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/services.md", "resolution": "CONFLICT — OUR side: main's 365141f735 (PR 14856) had edited the very bullet this PR deletes (退 1 to 退 3); the bullet stays deleted and the move stands; 28 lines, ceiling 28 unchanged"},
    {"path": "scripts/check-ratchet-remedy-authority.mjs", "resolution": "CONFLICT — BOTH kept: main's a610775432 (PR 14896) roster and floor block plus this PR's section (21). (21) now opens with battery('(21) The ruled cross-file-move exception (2026-09-03)'), is declared in SELF_TEST_BATTERIES at its case count 2, and sits before the floor-evaluation block (line order at head: opener 1401, floor 1417, verdict 1468). SELF_TEST_BATTERY_FLOOR 20 to 21 — the header pins the roster SIZE at the declared count (20 entries pinned 20), so 21 entries pin 21. Exception phrase stays assembled, never spelled, in author-facing text; the gate's run line at head is byte-identical to main's own (186 swept; 184 at the PR base — main grew the corpus, this gate's classification did not move)"},
    {"path": ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/platform-readings.md", "resolution": "NO conflict — follow-up commit 8b7a2ec36c: line 301 退 1 to 退 3, verified against git show 365141f735: all five refusal paths of scripts/check-i18n-coverage.mjs (3), scripts/check-i18n-bundles.mjs (1), packages/cli/scripts/check-app-nav-i18n.mjs (1) moved from process.exit(1) to process.exit(EXIT_PREREQUISITE_NOT_MET), the constant scripts/import-prerequisite.mjs exports as 3. 324 lines unchanged, ceiling 324; no other edit"},
    {"path": "scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs", "resolution": "AUTO-MERGED with main's c47a5ac4c6 (PR 14853 handshake). The handshake covers selfTest()'s SELF_TEST_VERDICT sentinel return only (return at 1561, dispatch check at 1570); the two run-path verdict lines this PR adds are outside it, so no registration was needed; measure-self-test-floor.mjs is a census not wired to CI. Run green with both move verdicts; self-test 136 cases pass"}
  ],
  "commits": [
    {"sha": "cb4abd788f", "subject": "Merge origin/main into claude/issue-14685-ratchet-cross-file-move", "content": "conflict resolutions + (21) roster integration folded in (without the roster edit the merge head reds its own self-test)"},
    {"sha": "8b7a2ec36c", "subject": "docs(pm-dispatch): carry main's corrected exit code into the moved i18n reading", "content": "ONE follow-up commit, the 退 3 fact carry-over only, kept out of the merge commit so the merge commit's diff against each parent is conflict resolution and nothing else"}
  ],
  "gates": {
    "derivation": "node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --commands at 8b7a2ec36c — gate list derived from the tree of 'objectstack-ai/objectstack' at commit 8b7a2ec36c; change set derived from git — 6 path(s) vs merge base 09cc6be43 of 'origin/main' and HEAD; 27 commands. Exit codes captured by redirect before any pipe; heavy runs via scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh slot issue-14685-item5-merge (doc-formula 1s+2s+7s, doc-authoring 6s, pm-dispatch-gates 298s, formula build 195s, lint build 14s; waited 0s each)",
    "results": [
      ["node scripts/check-ci-filter-parity.mjs", 0, "OK: all 133 declared cross-package glob(s) (93 unique) are covered by core or crosspkg …"],
      ["node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs", 0, "check-closing-keyword-parity: OK (3 parsers agree on all 9 keywords and both measured separators; sweep found 5 file(s) … all registered)"],
      ["node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs", 0, "✓ comment-mask corpus sweep [scripts/js-comment-mask.mjs]: 5820 files, 0 disagree, 0 unparseable, 56.1s (comparator self-test: 12 cases pass)"],
      ["node scripts/check-cross-package-test-inputs.mjs", 0, "OK: 25 package(s) read outside themselves, all declared, and turbo.json hashes every declared glob"],
      ["node scripts/check-self-test-wired.mjs", 0, "✓ check-self-test-wired: every one of the 166 script(s) CI runs that ship a --self-test has that self-test run by CI"],
      ["node scripts/check-shard-attestation.mjs", 0, "✓ check-shard-attestation: 2 aggregate gate(s) count 3 declared leg(s) across 3 attesting job(s)"],
      ["node scripts/check-test-completeness.mjs", 3, "check-test-completeness: PREREQUISITE NOT MET — this gate grades a saved turbo run test log, and no log was named — NOT MEASURED"],
      ["node scripts/check-whole-set-label-write.mjs", 0, "✓ check-whole-set-label-write: 0 violations — 252 file(s) over 3 root(s) · 11 raw mention(s) · 11 in comments/prose (cleared) · 0 in EXECUTABLE content (judged) …"],
      ["node scripts/pm/bare-root-worklist.mjs --self-test", 0, "OK self-test: 57 live row(s), 49 unreachable as spelled, 49 recorded verdict(s) — none stale, none missing, none contradicted …"],
      ["pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions", 0, "✓ check:doc-formula-expressions: 22 record-scoped formula example(s) across 426 files / 1365 TS blocks judged clean by @objectstack/formula · ✓ 9 @example(s) judged clean across 1137 packages/spec/src files · ✓ 14 predicate(s) … judged clean — after two exit-3 refusals (@objectstack/formula, then @objectstack/lint unbuilt in the fresh worktree), both built through the lock"],
      ["pnpm check:agent-test-spelling", 0, "✓ check-agent-test-spelling: 0 violations — 432 file(s) · 5851 bare -- token(s) · 1389 launcher-rooted run(s) · 9 separator(s) JUDGED …"],
      ["pnpm check:bash32-floor", 0, "✓ check-bash32-floor: 26 tracked shell file(s) … name no bash 4+ construct outside a comment …"],
      ["pnpm check:cli-command-ids", 0, "✓ check-cli-command-ids: 324 command-id literal(s) across 114 file(s) outside packages/cli all resolve to a real command path …"],
      ["pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs", 0, "OK: 25 package(s) read outside themselves, all declared, and turbo.json hashes every declared glob"],
      ["pnpm check:doc-authoring", 0, "✓ doc authoring guard: sibling-package prose ids hold the baseline — 831 pinned site(s) across 231 file(s), 83568 string(s) read in 1132 parsed source(s), no growth, no burn-down unrecorded"],
      ["pnpm check:entry-guard", 0, "✓ check:entry-guard: 201 scripts/ file(s) — every entry guard goes through invoked-as.mjs; 152 export bindings, 152 of them inert on import"],
      ["pnpm check:nul-bytes", 0, "check-nul-bytes: OK (scanned 8145 text file(s) -- 8145 tracked, 0 untracked-not-ignored; skipped 7 binary; no raw ASCII control bytes)"],
      ["pnpm check:parse-guard", 0, "✓ check:parse-guard: 200 scripts/ file(s) — every TypeScript parse goes through ts-parse.mjs"],
      ["pnpm check:pm-dispatch-gates", 0, "✓ dispatch-gates self-test: 1288 cases pass"],
      ["pnpm check:pm-governed-merges", 0, "✓ check-governed-merges --self-test: 243 assertions …"],
      ["pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint", 0, "✓ check-skill-id-lint: 23 file(s) clean"],
      ["pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet", 0, "✓ check-skill-line-ratchet: cross-file move into … platform-readings.md: +10 (314→324) against a net source decrease of 11 (cli.md 35→31, services.md 30→28, rest-channel.md 93→88); authorised by #14685 item 5 (comment 5520452691) · ✓ declared cross-file moves: 1, total ceilings down 1 line · self-test: 136 cases pass"],
      ["pnpm check:pnpm-filter-targets", 0, "✓ check:pnpm-filter-targets: 142/181 --filter occurrence(s) across 33 file(s) resolve against 79 workspace package(s) …"],
      ["pnpm check:ratchet-remedy-authority", 0, "OK  check-ratchet-remedy-authority: 186 scripts swept (scripts/*.{mjs,mts}); 12 mark the expanding remedy ⛔ MAINTAINER-ONLY, 6 turn it down outright, 168 hand out no ratchet-expanding remedy. Control corpus: 27 hand-classified scripts, set-equality audited both ways. — byte-identical to main's line (run from an extracted origin/main scripts/ tree); --self-test: OK self-test … with (21) attributed and floored"],
      ["pnpm check:refd-timer-probe", 0, "OK  check-refd-timer-probe: 5815 source file(s) swept; the process-global timer probe is read in packages/qa/refd-timer-testkit/src/index.ts and nowhere else"],
      ["pnpm check:skill-frame-sync", 0, "✓ check-skill-frame-sync: 2 copies of the decision frame are structurally isomorphic across 2 files"],
      ["pnpm check:watch-hint-literal", 0, "✓ check-watch-hint-literal: 48 declaration(s) across 4 rostered name(s) … no unrostered spelling of the idiom in the tree"]
    ]
  },
  "reverse_verification": "ONE mutation on the committed state (HEAD 8b7a2ec36c): the battery('(21) …') opener deleted — proved on disk by grep count of the opener 1 to 0 and git diff --stat 1 deletion, before any verdict was read. Result: --self-test exit 1, 2 failures; the floor's own line: self-test battery \"(21) The ruled cross-file-move exception (2026-09-03)\" DID NOT RUN — 0 cases registered, 2 pinned, plus the remedy line. Direction as observed, not as pre-set: with battery (20) still open the two orphaned assertions are attributed to (20) (the roster attributes to the most recently opened battery), so the floor names (21) as not having run instead of filing them under the unattributed key — that key fires only when no battery has been opened at all. Restore: git checkout HEAD -- /home/user/objectstack-14685-item5-merge/scripts/check-ratchet-remedy-authority.mjs under an EXIT/INT/TERM trap; proven by git hash-object == HEAD blob db620010d07050a66cbd2fe7b55ea3631ca42e40 and empty git diff HEAD (also re-checked outside the script); control re-run green, exit 0.",
  "not_measured": [
    "node scripts/check-test-completeness.mjs — exit 3, its own words: it grades a saved turbo run test log and none was named; the diff touches two gate scripts and four instruction-surface markdown files, no package source, so no test farm was run to produce one; CI tees the log on every invocation",
    "the always-runs tail (workflows with no path filter), 1 CI-measured-only family (reads the workflow event payload) and 9 changeset-gated families (no changeset, by design; skip-changeset) — CI is the reading",
    "pnpm lint (repo-wide eslint) — not in the derived union for these paths and not run; a stated narrowing, as in section 5 of the PR",
    "CI convergence at 8b7a2ec36c — not waited for (report at delivery per the standing term); PR state read back as mergeable_state blocked with draft false"
  ],
  "tests": "At 8b7a2ec36c (git rev-parse --short HEAD): node scripts/check-ratchet-remedy-authority.mjs exit 0, run line byte-identical to main's (diff of the two last lines: IDENTICAL); --self-test exit 0. node scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs exit 0 with the two move verdict lines and 0 ✗ lines; --self-test exit 0, 136 cases pass. Full 27-command union above (26 exit 0, 1 exit 3 NOT MEASURED). Reverse verification as stated. Post-merge refresh: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile exit 0 (the merge moved pnpm-lock.yaml and pnpm-workspace.yaml); tree clean after every step; no os-regen-pending recorded (main's generated artifacts arrived one-sided, no driver invocation).",
  "mcp_calls": "5 — pull_request_read get (baseline body), update_pull_request (section 8), pull_request_read get (read-back), add_issue_comment on PR 14860, add_issue_comment on issue 14685 (this report). Channel: a repo-scoped REST read of api.github.com answered 403 for this session (GitHub access not enabled for this session; gh absent), so MCP carried every GitHub read and write; the rendered PR page (public, HTTP 200) served as the zero-quota check that the blockquote is stored as a real '>' character.",
  "findings": [
    "platform reading (not filed): pull_request_read returned the body entity-encoded (&gt; &#39; &#34;) on the 15:10 read of the create-path body and PLAIN on the 15:38 read after update_pull_request; decoding before write-back round-tripped byte-identical (31858 bytes). Also contrary to the 2026-08-26 reading in AGENTS.md: both session-URL footers AND the trailing --- survived this MCP update_pull_request edit verbatim (no normalisation to bare, nothing eaten) — one measurement, PR body, 2026-09-03T15:38Z",
    "tooling DX (not filed): in a fresh worktree check:doc-formula-expressions refuses twice in sequence — first naming @objectstack/formula, then @objectstack/lint — each advisory names one unbuilt prerequisite at a time, costing two lock rounds; naming both at once would save one. Observation-class",
    "roster semantics (not filed, works as designed): UNATTRIBUTED_BATTERY is reachable only for assertions before the first battery() call; a deleted mid-file opener is caught by that battery's DID NOT RUN floor, not by the unattributed key — the brief's expected message differs from the observed one for that reason"
  ],
  "questions": [],
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": []
}

Generated by Claude Code

tooling(pm): admit a same-PR cross-file line-budget move, and take th…

Item 5 landed and the card closes (skills seat linger, session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1, read 2026-09-03T16:36Z by the linger patrol — git log origin/main --grep '(#14860)' and the API head 5d1a7ca42c = refs/heads/main in the same minute).

PR tooling(pm): admit a same-PR cross-file line-budget move, and take the first one #14860 merged as af5fac2d40 — API merged_at 15:54:00Z; the commit on main is dated 16:02:05Z. Both readings recorded, not chosen between.
All five items of this batch are on main: 1 → Migrate the two in-repo hook examples (app-crm OpportunityStageHook, app-todo taskHook) to defineHook() so the platform's own examples match what the published data skill teaches (#14685 item 1, ruled A) #14850 filed (examples lane, bare, the ruled post-step); 2 → PR docs(pm-dispatch): X0 quote policy — date pointers for non-operative maintainer quotations (item 2 of the skills batch, ruling B) #14911 7655492f61; 3 → PR docs(pm-dispatch): collapse CLAUDE.md's four excerpts to rule, hook and anchor #14855 5290fcbe91; 4 → PR docs(pm-dispatch): keep two copies of the decision frame, not four #14862 7b19b9ea88; 5 → PR tooling(pm): admit a same-PR cross-file line-budget move, and take the first one #14860 af5fac2d40 (the cross-file line-budget move rule, the remedy-authority exception, and the first move into platform-readings.md, +10 against a net source decrease of 11; map total 5112 → 5111).
Closing completed. Label clean: pm:dispatched removed; priority:p1 and domain:skills stay.
Restart-when notes left on [finding] The &page=N completeness walk refuses with HTTP 422 past 9,900 items — the ceiling on the remedy #14068 just landed #14133, finding(skills): spec@objectui shift-end report 2026-09-02 — two principle gaps (types-face routing vs. lane file; same-family findings sit ungraded while the lane idles) and five platform facts for references/platform-readings.md #14445, [finding] The in-seat contract-review path was read as "the implementing session reviews its own diff" — PR #14191 was PASSed and label-cleared by its author session, dropping the independence clause and the director seat's never-writes-code charter in one act #14209, The internal dispatch runbook has no step that pastes the decision frame into the dev prompt — after #14685 item 4 (PR #14862) the dev definition expects it there and has no copy of its own #14869, [finding] Four gate-script comments still say the decision frame has "four" / "two enforced" copies after #14685 item 4 reduced COPIES to two — dispatch-gates.mjs:8090/:8095, check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs:455, check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs:334/:345/:359 #14870 and [finding] After ruling B (#14859), AGENTS.md:12-13 and the scripts/pm/check-skill-id-lint.mjs header still describe the pm-dispatch provenance form as "date + verbatim quote" — the two off-surface sentences PR #14911 could not touch #14913 for the next skills seat. No dispatch: the seat signed off at 15:24Z on the maintainer's directive and lingers on the named tails only.

Generated by Claude Code

pm-dispatch: SKILL.md principle-only (815 → 319 lines) — dispatch / r…

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

[Decision] Skills optimization program — batch 3 (5 items): DATA-F-07 `defineHook()` vs the platform's own examples · #13597 Phase-2 — X0 quote policy · `CLAUDE.md` excerpt form · the four-copy decision frame · cross-file line-budget moves #14685

1. DATA-F-07 —— 已发布 data skill 教 `defineHook()`,平台自己的两个真实 hook 却用裸字面量:改文档,还是改示例?

2. #13597 Phase-2 · X0 —— 内部语料逐字内联维护者裁决原话的政策

3. #13597 Phase-2 · `CLAUDE.md` 的摘录形态(86 行,天花板 86)

4. #13597 Phase-2 · 决策框架四份副本(`check:skill-frame-sync` 锁定)

5. #13597 Phase-2 · 跨文件行预算搬运

Flight report — item 5

What landed

Arithmetic

Gates

Reverse verification

Judgement calls

Channel declarations

Deviations, self-declared

Out-of-scope findings — not filed by me, for the seat to dedup and file

Structured report

Flight report — item 4

The confidence gap the ruling carried — DISCHARGED, before any edit

What landed

Judgement calls (each also in the PR body)

The anti-dormancy proof — both directions measured

Gates — union derived at the final head, 31 green, 1 NOT MEASURED, 0 red

Out-of-scope findings — NOT filed by me, for the seat to dedup and file

Item 2 unblocked — #14859 ruled B (maintainer, 2026-09-03, 「其他同意」)

Flight report — item 2 (r2)

What landed

Gate table at head `e556641d39` (exit codes captured by redirect before any pipe)

Judgement calls (every one)

Out-of-scope findings (recorded, not filed — the seat dedups and files)

Flight report — item 2 (r2) addendum

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

[Decision] Skills optimization program — batch 3 (5 items): DATA-F-07 defineHook() vs the platform's own examples · #13597 Phase-2 — X0 quote policy · CLAUDE.md excerpt form · the four-copy decision frame · cross-file line-budget moves #14685

Description

1. DATA-F-07 —— 已发布 data skill 教 defineHook(),平台自己的两个真实 hook 却用裸字面量:改文档,还是改示例?

2. #13597 Phase-2 · X0 —— 内部语料逐字内联维护者裁决原话的政策

3. #13597 Phase-2 · CLAUDE.md 的摘录形态(86 行,天花板 86)

4. #13597 Phase-2 · 决策框架四份副本(check:skill-frame-sync 锁定)

5. #13597 Phase-2 · 跨文件行预算搬运

Activity

os-litant commented on Sep 3, 2026

os-litant commented on Sep 3, 2026

os-litant commented on Sep 3, 2026

Flight report — item 5

What landed

Arithmetic

Gates

Reverse verification

Judgement calls

Channel declarations

Deviations, self-declared

Out-of-scope findings — not filed by me, for the seat to dedup and file

Structured report

os-litant commented on Sep 3, 2026

Flight report — item 4

The confidence gap the ruling carried — DISCHARGED, before any edit

What landed

Judgement calls (each also in the PR body)

The anti-dormancy proof — both directions measured

Gates — union derived at the final head, 31 green, 1 NOT MEASURED, 0 red

Out-of-scope findings — NOT filed by me, for the seat to dedup and file

os-litant commented on Sep 3, 2026

os-litant commented on Sep 3, 2026

os-litant commented on Sep 3, 2026

os-litant commented on Sep 3, 2026

os-litant commented on Sep 3, 2026

os-project-manager commented on Sep 3, 2026

Item 2 unblocked — #14859 ruled B (maintainer, 2026-09-03, 「其他同意」)

os-litant commented on Sep 3, 2026

Flight report — item 2 (r2)

What landed

Gate table at head e556641d39 (exit codes captured by redirect before any pipe)

Judgement calls (every one)

Out-of-scope findings (recorded, not filed — the seat dedups and files)

os-litant commented on Sep 3, 2026

Flight report — item 2 (r2) addendum

os-litant commented on Sep 3, 2026

os-litant commented on Sep 3, 2026

os-litant commented on Sep 3, 2026

os-litant commented on Sep 3, 2026

os-litant commented on Sep 3, 2026

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

[Decision] Skills optimization program — batch 3 (5 items): DATA-F-07 `defineHook()` vs the platform's own examples · #13597 Phase-2 — X0 quote policy · `CLAUDE.md` excerpt form · the four-copy decision frame · cross-file line-budget moves #14685

1. DATA-F-07 —— 已发布 data skill 教 `defineHook()`,平台自己的两个真实 hook 却用裸字面量:改文档,还是改示例?

3. #13597 Phase-2 · `CLAUDE.md` 的摘录形态(86 行,天花板 86)

4. #13597 Phase-2 · 决策框架四份副本(`check:skill-frame-sync` 锁定)

Gate table at head `e556641d39` (exit codes captured by redirect before any pipe)