docs(plugin-sharing): re-anchor the dead tracker citations to the commits that decided them

Comment and docblock prose under packages/plugins/plugin-sharing/src that
cited a tracker number answering 404 now cites the commit in this
repository's history that decided what the line describes, in ruling
C+D's form C. 87 sites on 86 lines in 23 files, 13 numbers, 13 distinct
commits; one more line re-points a referent the removed number left
behind. Comments only: every file keeps its line count, no code token
moves, and no citation number is added.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XY5uCwTjZj7884yYtyur4H
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

Author: claude

packages/plugins/plugin-sharing/src/backfill-sys-record-share-organizations.test.ts

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 // Copyright (c) 2026 ObjectStack. Licensed under the Apache-2.0 license.
 //
-// #14484 — the backfill half of "A: tenant-scoped, writer-repaired, backfilled".
+// commit 3f64fe6c6 — the backfill half of "A: tenant-scoped, writer-repaired, backfilled".
 //
 // These pin the properties the maintainer ruling names, as behaviour rather
 // than as prose:

packages/plugins/plugin-sharing/src/backfill-sys-record-share-organizations.ts

@@ -2,16 +2,16 @@
 
 /**
  * backfill-sys-record-share-organizations — the ONE-OFF repair sweep for the
- * `sys_record_share` rows the pre-#14484 `SharingService.grant` stranded with
+ * `sys_record_share` rows that `SharingService.grant`, before commit 3f64fe6c6, stranded with
  * no organization.
  *
  * ## What this repairs, and why it is not optional
  *
- * #14484 fixed the WRITER: `SharingService.grant` now stamps
+ * Commit 3f64fe6c6 fixed the WRITER: `SharingService.grant` now stamps
  * `organization_id` on every insert and update of `sys_record_share` — a
  * rule-materialised grant carries the granting rule's organization, a direct
  * grant the shared record's. It wrote nothing to existing rows, and on a WALLED
- * deployment that asymmetry is the cliff the card names:
+ * deployment that asymmetry is the cliff that commit pins:
  *
  *   - the SQL driver's own tenant predicate is NULL-TOLERANT —
  *     `(organization_id = :tenantId OR organization_id IS NULL)` — so an
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
  * The tree's precedents for this shape are
  * `plugin-approvals/src/backfill-platform-row-organizations.ts` and
  * `service-storage/src/backfill-sys-file-organizations.ts`, and both require a
- * MAINTAINER ORDER PER TABLE. The 2026-09-02 ruling on #14484 (decision batch
+ * MAINTAINER ORDER PER TABLE. The 2026-09-02 ruling commit 3f64fe6c6 applies (decision batch
  * #11 item 3, maintainer verbatim 「#13564 转维护者处理；其他同意」 — "其他同意"
  * adopts A: tenant-scoped, writer-repaired, existing rows backfilled from the
  * record they grant access to) IS that order, and it is the order for
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ import { resolveTenantFieldName } from '@objectstack/objectql';
 
 /**
  * The ONE object this sweep repairs. ⛔ Scope-pinned by the 2026-09-02 ruling
- * on #14484 — a second table needs its own maintainer order (see the module
+ * applied by commit 3f64fe6c6 — a second table needs its own maintainer order (see the module
  * doc).
  */
 export const SYS_RECORD_SHARE_BACKFILL_OBJECT = 'sys_record_share';

packages/plugins/plugin-sharing/src/exec-context-annotation.pin.ts

@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
  * #7136 — compile-time pin for the CONTEXT type this plugin's enforcement
  * methods accept.
  *
- * #6523 converged 36 contract signatures onto the full `ExecutionContext` (the
- * #6206 ruling: enforcement adjudicates on the whole `resolveAuthzContext`
+ * Commit aa4b90d9a converged 36 contract signatures onto the full `ExecutionContext` (the
+ * full-envelope ruling: enforcement adjudicates on the whole `resolveAuthzContext`
  * envelope, never a per-site subset). #7136 is the consumer half — the
  * implementations here now annotate their own parameters with that same
  * envelope instead of the six-field shape they used to name.

packages/plugins/plugin-sharing/src/objects/sys-record-share.object.ts

@@ -153,15 +153,15 @@ export const SysRecordShare = ObjectSchema.create({
       //
       // ⚠️ ORDERING CONSTRAINT — this id half is `required: true`, and that
       // makes it ORDER-DEPENDENT in seeds even though a pointer pair
-      // contributes no static ordering edge (#11674, measured against the real
+      // contributes no static ordering edge (commit 1cba33f16, measured against the real
       // engine in `packages/objectql/src/engine-seed-required-deferral.test.ts`):
       // the seed loader defers an unresolvable reference by DELETING the column
       // from the pass-1 insert, required-validation rejects that row, and pass 2
       // is then left with no row to back-fill. So the pass-2 healing that makes
       // an OPTIONAL id half order-independent (`sys_audit_log`) does not reach
       // this one. ⇒ SEED THE TARGET DATASET FIRST. The failure if you do not is
       // loud in three places — a write error naming this column, a
-      // dropped-deferral error, and `success: false` — and since #11674 the
+      // dropped-deferral error, and `success: false` — and since commit 1cba33f16 the
       // loader also WARNS at load time, before the engine rejects the row.
       referenceVia: 'object_name',
     }),

packages/plugins/plugin-sharing/src/objects/sys-share-link.object.ts

@@ -144,15 +144,15 @@ export const SysShareLink = ObjectSchema.create({
       //
       // ⚠️ ORDERING CONSTRAINT — this id half is `required: true`, and that
       // makes it ORDER-DEPENDENT in seeds even though a pointer pair
-      // contributes no static ordering edge (#11674, measured against the real
+      // contributes no static ordering edge (commit 1cba33f16, measured against the real
       // engine in `packages/objectql/src/engine-seed-required-deferral.test.ts`):
       // the seed loader defers an unresolvable reference by DELETING the column
       // from the pass-1 insert, required-validation rejects that row, and pass 2
       // is then left with no row to back-fill. So the pass-2 healing that makes
       // an OPTIONAL id half order-independent (`sys_audit_log`) does not reach
       // this one. ⇒ SEED THE TARGET DATASET FIRST. The failure if you do not is
       // loud in three places — a write error naming this column, a
-      // dropped-deferral error, and `success: false` — and since #11674 the
+      // dropped-deferral error, and `success: false` — and since commit 1cba33f16 the
       // loader also WARNS at load time, before the engine rejects the row.
       referenceVia: 'object_name',
     }),

packages/plugins/plugin-sharing/src/position-graph.ts

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ export interface PositionGraphOptions {
  *
  * ⚠️ A SECOND implementation of this question lives in `plugin-approvals`
  * (`ApprovalService.expandPositionUsers`), and it is deliberately NOT identical
- * — do not unify them without reading #8613 / #8710 first. Approval routing is
+ * — do not unify them without reading #8613 / commit 04d03c3a0 first. Approval routing is
  * an ADDRESSING path, so it reads the directory raw and applies no ADR-0091 D2
  * window: dropping a lapsed holder there is fail-OPEN (a step routing to
  * nobody). Note also that the `sys_position.active` gate for THIS path is not

packages/plugins/plugin-sharing/src/reconcile-refused-grant-continues.test.ts

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
  *
  * ## The shape, and which half of it is the security half
  *
- * After #14484 `sys_record_share` is `tenant-scoped` in the #13491 ledger, so
+ * After commit 3f64fe6c6 `sys_record_share` is `tenant-scoped` in the #13491 ledger, so
  * on a walled install an organization-less system insert on it is refused
  * loudly with `ERR_SYSTEM_WRITE_ORGANIZATION_REQUIRED` (#8844).
  * `SharingService.grant` resolves the organization on every path that can; a
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
  * the deployment posture. A fake engine would have to imitate the very thing
  * whose behaviour decides the case. So these cases run a real `SqlDriver` on
  * better-sqlite3 `:memory:` behind a real `ObjectQL` on an `isolated` posture,
- * the way `record-share-organization-stamp.test.ts` does for the #14484 stamp.
+ * the way `record-share-organization-stamp.test.ts` does for the commit 3f64fe6c6 stamp.
  *
  * ## Why the fixture's organization-less record is in the MIDDLE
  *
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ describe('[#14754] reconcile: a refused grant is counted and the pass CONTINUES'
     const rule = await platformGlobalRule(rules, 'os14754_update_half', 'read');
 
     // A pre-existing rule grant on the organization-less record, carrying no
-    // organization (which is how it got there before #14484). The pass wants
+    // organization (which is how it got there before commit 3f64fe6c6). The pass wants
     // to raise it to `edit`.
     await driver.create('sys_record_share', {
       id: 'shr_orgless_old', object_name: OBJECT, record_id: 'rec_orgless', recipient_type: 'user',

packages/plugins/plugin-sharing/src/record-share-organization-stamp.test.ts

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 // Copyright (c) 2026 ObjectStack. Licensed under the Apache-2.0 license.
 
 /**
- * [#14484] Every `sys_record_share` row carries `organization_id` — on a REAL
+ * [commit 3f64fe6c6] Every `sys_record_share` row carries `organization_id` — on a REAL
  * engine over a REAL driver, both write paths, plus the backfill and the
  * engine rule the ledger flip switches on.
  *

packages/plugins/plugin-sharing/src/rule-criteria-org-scope.test.ts

@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ const DEAL_FIELDS: Record<string, Record<string, unknown>> = {
 
 const SHARE_FIELDS: Record<string, Record<string, unknown>> = {
   id: { type: 'text', name: 'id', label: 'Id', primary: true },
-  // [#14484] The tenant column the registry provisions on every platform
+  // [commit 3f64fe6c6] The tenant column the registry provisions on every platform
   // object (`applySystemFields`); this hand-built table must declare it too,
   // now that the writer stamps it — the fixture was never spec-faithful
   // without it, the omission just had no reader.

packages/plugins/plugin-sharing/src/share-link-eligibility.test.ts

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
  * the ablation meaningful: with the new predicate removed, the eligibility
  * cases must flip red and these five must stay green.
  *
- * ## [#13608] The second seam: the same policy, held again at REDEMPTION
+ * ## [commit fc9ba76a5] The second seam: the same policy, held again at REDEMPTION
  *
  * Enforcing at mint alone left the adjacent half open, and the state the
  * predicate reads is exactly the state an editor changes: publish an article
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ import type { DriverQuery } from '@objectstack/spec/contracts';
 import { assertEngineUpdateDispatch, assertEngineFindOnePredicate } from '@objectstack/objectql';
 import type { IHttpServer, IHttpRequest, IHttpResponse, RouteHandler } from '@objectstack/spec/contracts';
 import { ShareLinkService } from './share-link-service.js';
-// [#13608] The PUBLIC seam an anonymous holder actually reaches. The refusal's
+// [commit fc9ba76a5] The PUBLIC seam an anonymous holder actually reaches. The refusal's
 // shape is a claim about what that caller can observe, so it is measured there
 // and not only on the service's return value.
 import { registerShareLinkRoutes } from './share-link-routes.js';
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ interface BootOptions {
    */
   shapeRow?: (row: any) => any;
   /**
-   * [#13608] Collect the service's server-side log. The redemption refusal is
+   * [commit fc9ba76a5] Collect the service's server-side log. The redemption refusal is
    * deliberately silent on the wire, so this is where the REASON it refused
    * becomes assertable — and where the ruling says the reason belongs.
    */
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ async function boot(article: any = ARTICLE, options: BootOptions = {}) {
 
   const schemas: Record<string, any> = { article, sys_share_link: SysShareLink };
   /**
-   * [#13608] Every read the service issues, in order. Two claims are measured
+   * [commit fc9ba76a5] Every read the service issues, in order. Two claims are measured
    * off it: the `id`-only probe is UNCHANGED for an object with no predicate,
    * and the eligibility path widens that same read rather than adding a second.
    */
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ describe('[#7861] publicSharing.eligibility is enforced at createLink', () => {
 
 
 /**
- * [#13608] The redemption seam.
+ * [commit fc9ba76a5] The redemption seam.
  *
  * `resolveToken` checked `revoked_at`, `expires_at`, the audience gates, the
  * password and record EXISTENCE — and served whatever survived, under
@@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ describe('[#13608] publicSharing.eligibility is enforced again at REDEMPTION', (
  * `publicSharing.enabled` governed MINTING only: `getPolicy()` collapsed to an
  * empty policy when the block was off, and `resolveToken` read nothing off
  * `policy.enabled`. So the platform held this shape — the predicate INSIDE
- * the block was re-evaluated at every redemption (#13608, above) while turning
+ * the block was re-evaluated at every redemption (commit fc9ba76a5, above) while turning
  * the ENTIRE block off did not stop a single existing link. Maintainer ruling
  * of 2026-09-01 (quoted verbatim in `share-link-service.test.ts`'s reversal
  * register): the switch is a standing policy held at every redemption,
@@ -983,7 +983,7 @@ describe('[#14033] publicSharing.enabled is a standing policy — the switch is
   /**
    * The HTTP seam, driven end-to-end on the real service through the real
    * route, with the route's SECURE default context — every request below is
-   * anonymous. Same reading as the #13608 pin above, for the same reason: the
+   * anonymous. Same reading as the commit fc9ba76a5 pin above, for the same reason: the
    * switched-off link lands in the generic "invalid / expired / revoked"
    * answer, byte-for-byte what a token that NEVER EXISTED gets — not the 410
    * bucket, which would confirm the token was real, and not a 422 naming the
@@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ describe('[#14637] the route probe reads the standing policy before it answers f
     // Back-dated on the stored row, not minted: `createLink` refuses a past
     // `expiresAt` outright (`422 EXPIRY_IN_PAST`), so this is the only way to
     // reach an ALREADY-EXPIRED link — and it is exactly what the passage of
-    // time does to a live one. Same stamp the #13608 pins above use.
+    // time does to a live one. Same stamp the commit fc9ba76a5 pins above use.
     await driver.update('sys_share_link', link.id, {
       expires_at: new Date(Date.now() - 60_000).toISOString(),
     });
@@ -1306,7 +1306,7 @@ describe('[#14637] the route probe reads the standing policy before it answers f
 });
 
 /**
- * [#13608] Mount the real PUBLIC resolve route on the real service.
+ * [commit fc9ba76a5] Mount the real PUBLIC resolve route on the real service.
  *
  * Only the verbs `registerShareLinkRoutes` calls are implemented, and the
  * SECURE default `contextFromRequest` is deliberately left in place: it reads
@@ -1318,7 +1318,7 @@ describe('[#14637] the route probe reads the standing policy before it answers f
  * the `audience: 'signed_in'` arm from the serving side), and the returned
  * driver takes the request query (the only way to reach the `WRONG_PASSWORD`
  * arm). Omit both and this is byte-for-byte the anonymous, query-less harness
- * the #13608 and #14033 pins above drive.
+ * the commit fc9ba76a5 and #14033 pins above drive.
  */
 function mountResolveRoute(service: ShareLinkService, engine: unknown, signedInUserId?: string) {
   const routes = new Map<string, RouteHandler>();