Repository navigation
Commit af35cd5
committed
docs(adr-0043,skill-automation): open-time notification is approval.requested; one-tap links stay remind()-only
ADR-0043's Issue bullet said open-time notification remained the flow
author's notify node. Since openNodeRequest publishes approval.requested
to each concrete approver on the slate the request opens on, that
sentence is false. The Status line carries the dated amendment marker and
the parenthesis carries the correction; the token table and every
decision are unchanged.
The automation skill's best practice 5 keeps the decision half (notify
the submitter of the outcome from the approve/reject edges), drops "the
node does not send", and names the double-notify trap: the opening
already tells each resolved approver, so no notify node for the opening.
The reference file sits at its token ceiling; the duplicated
approval_revise comment (it restated the "no config, no signal" sentence
above it) pays for the new text.
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RdnZdPZH9ByduzPRWuH9tN1 parent 3d0eeef commit af35cd5
2 files changed
Lines changed: 10 additions & 8 deletions
File tree
- docs/adr
- skills/objectstack-automation/references
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
1 | 1 | | |
2 | 2 | | |
3 | | - | |
| 3 | + | |
4 | 4 | | |
5 | 5 | | |
6 | 6 | | |
| |||
37 | 37 | | |
38 | 38 | | |
39 | 39 | | |
40 | | - | |
41 | | - | |
42 | | - | |
| 40 | + | |
| 41 | + | |
| 42 | + | |
| 43 | + | |
| 44 | + | |
43 | 45 | | |
44 | 46 | | |
45 | 47 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
180 | 180 | | |
181 | 181 | | |
182 | 182 | | |
183 | | - | |
184 | | - | |
185 | 183 | | |
186 | 184 | | |
187 | 185 | | |
| |||
379 | 377 | | |
380 | 378 | | |
381 | 379 | | |
382 | | - | |
383 | | - | |
| 380 | + | |
| 381 | + | |
| 382 | + | |
| 383 | + | |
0 commit comments