You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Commit 54aa39a
Browse filesBrowse the repository at this point in the historyBrowse files
en: 'Declarative HTTP endpoint — a stable URL and policy layer over an existing pipeline (ADR-0121)',
315
+
en: 'A stable HTTP URL that other systems call to run a flow or work with records in the app',
310
316
verdict: ALL_TRANSLATE,
311
317
reason:
312
-
'⭐ "pipeline" READS LIKE AN ApiEndpointSchema.type AND IS NOT ONE — asserted below: the schema accepts type "proxy" and refuses type "pipeline" (flow/script/object_operation/proxy), so the word is prose and is rendered 管道 / パイプライン / pipeline. "policy" takes the sense this catalog already separates and round 6 recorded: 策略 for a configured strategy (hook.fields.retryPolicy.label 重试策略), NOT 政策 which is reserved for a published document (sys_oauth_application.fields.policy.label 隐私政策); ja ポリシー, es política. "layer" takes sys_view_definition.description (软件包层 / パッケージレイヤー / La capa de paquete) — ⚠️ zh renders it 层 and ja レイヤー there, but this leaf\'s ja reads 層 in the compound ポリシー層 because the twin\'s レイヤー is itself attached to a katakana head; the reading is recorded rather than silently harmonised. ⭐ `HTTP`, `URL` and `ADR-0121` are KEPT VERBATIM in all three — machine tokens by the rule that kept 256 and N in round 6, asserted by the token guard below. ⚠️ em-dash convention copied: zh folds to —— with no spaces (hook.sections.legacy_handler.description 函数名引用——已废弃), ja and es keep a spaced —.',
318
+
'REWRITTEN AS PLAIN ADMIN COPY: the registry description is what Setup shows, so it says what the item is and who uses it, and the ADR-0121 vocabulary (declarative endpoint, policy layer, pipeline) moved to the comment beside the registry row. It names only what EXECUTES: ApiEndpointSchema.type says only `flow` and `object_operation` run, while `script` and `proxy` are rejected at publish, so "run a flow or work with records" is the whole servable set in an admin\'s words. "records" takes the catalog\'s record noun (记录 / レコード / registros). ⇒ 其他系统调用的稳定 HTTP URL,用于运行流程或操作应用中的记录 / 他のシステムが呼び出す固定の HTTP URL。フローを実行したり、アプリのレコードを操作したりします / URL HTTP estable a la que llaman otros sistemas para ejecutar un flujo o trabajar con los registros de la aplicación. ⭐ `HTTP` and `URL` stay machine tokens in all three, asserted by the token guard below. ⚠️ No second person in zh/ja/es: the catalog carries no 你的/您的.',
en: 'A help page written in Markdown that a package ships or you write yourself',
328
334
verdict: ALL_TRANSLATE,
329
335
reason:
330
-
'⭐⭐ ONE OF THE TWO ROWS WHERE THE #19430 NEAR-MISS IS REAL. `package` IS a legal MetadataProvenanceSchema value and DocSchema really does accept `_provenance: "package"` while refusing a rendered one — both asserted below, so the trap is proved to exist before it is cleared. It is CLEARED three ways, each asserted: the key is `_provenance`, which the loader sets and no form asks for (a doc parses without it, and the whole en metadata-forms catalog names no `_`-prefixed key); `doc` is BARE, so this string labels no input at all; and where this catalog DOES render a leaf whose stored value is literally `package` it renders the display and keeps the value (sys_metadata.fields.managed_by.options.package is 包 / パッケージ / Paquete). ⇒ rendered. "flat" takes position.sections.position.description (扁平的 / フラットな / plano); "items" takes app.sections.navigation.description (侧边栏菜单项 / サイドバー項目 / Elementos de barra lateral). ⇒ 软件包文档——扁平的 Markdown 文档项(ADR-0046) / パッケージのドキュメント — フラットな Markdown 項目(ADR-0046) / Documentación del paquete — elementos Markdown planos (ADR-0046). ⚠️ zh answers "package" two ways in this catalog — 包 inside compounds (包 ID, 包版本) and 软件包 in running prose (软件包层) — and this is prose, so it takes 软件包. ⭐ `Markdown` is KEPT as a format proper noun in all three, the same treatment the catalog gives HTML in sys_email_template.fields.body_text.help; asserted by the token guard.',
336
+
'REWRITTEN AS PLAIN ADMIN COPY: "flat Markdown items (ADR-0046)" became what an admin meets, a help page, and the ADR reference moved to the comment beside the registry row. Both origins are named because the registry row is `allowRuntimeCreate: true`: a doc can be shipped by a package or drafted in place through saveMetaItem. `package` is still rendered as the noun, by the near-miss clearing asserted below (zh prose takes 软件包). zh/ja/es carry the second origin impersonally (自行编写 / 自分で作成 / redactada directamente). ⇒ 以 Markdown 编写的帮助页面,可由软件包随附,也可自行编写 / Markdown で書かれたヘルプページ。パッケージに同梱されるほか、自分で作成することもできます / Página de ayuda en Markdown, incluida en un paquete o redactada directamente. ⭐ `Markdown` is KEPT as a format proper noun in all three; asserted by the token guard.',
en: 'Documentation navigation spine — ordered groups with derived membership (ADR-0046 §6)',
351
+
en: 'A table of contents that groups help pages into ordered sections',
346
352
verdict: ALL_TRANSLATE,
347
353
reason:
348
-
'`groups` IS A KEY, NOT AN ENUM VALUE — asserted below by the rule round 6 used to clear timeoutMs: BookSchema.groups takes an ARRAY (it refuses the string "ordered"), so no rendered word can land in it. "navigation" takes app.sections.navigation.label (导航 / ナビゲーション / Navegación); "ordered" takes report.fields.order.label (排序 / 並び順 / Orden); "derived" takes dataset.fields.measures.derived.label (派生自 / 派生元 / Derivada de). "spine" and "membership" have no authored twin and the row says so: spine is rendered 主干 / 骨格 / Columna vertebral and membership 成员 / メンバーシップ / pertenencia. ⇒ 文档导航主干——有序分组,成员由派生确定(ADR-0046 §6) / ドキュメントナビゲーションの骨格 — 順序付きグループと派生されたメンバーシップ(ADR-0046 §6) / Columna vertebral de navegación de la documentación — grupos ordenados con pertenencia derivada (ADR-0046 §6). ⭐ `ADR-0046` AND `§6` are both kept verbatim — the section mark is part of the citation and is asserted as its own token, because dropping it is the kind of loss no census can see.',
354
+
'REWRITTEN AS PLAIN ADMIN COPY: "navigation spine — ordered groups with derived membership (ADR-0046 §6)" became a table of contents, and the ADR-0046 §6 vocabulary moved to the comment beside the registry row. No package clause: the row is `allowRuntimeCreate: true` and a brand-new book can be authored in place. "help pages" is the doc row\'s own phrase, so the two types read as a pair in every locale. "sections" is prose, not BookSchema.groups (a key that takes an array, asserted below). ⇒ 将帮助页面按顺序分节组织的目录 / ヘルプページを順序付きのセクションにまとめた目次 / Índice que organiza las páginas de ayuda en secciones ordenadas. No machine token is kept: the ADR citation and its §6 are exactly what this rewrite removed, asserted by the plain-copy guard below.',
en: 'Package-declared authorization capability — the DEFINITION side of ADR-0066 D1 (grants live on permission sets; requirements on resources)',
369
+
en: 'A permission a package defines; you grant it through permission sets',
364
370
verdict: ALL_TRANSLATE,
365
371
reason:
366
-
'THE SECOND REAL `package` NEAR-MISS, cleared exactly as the doc row above and asserted separately on CapabilityDeclarationSchema rather than inherited — the two schemas splice the same protection mixin but that is a fact to assert, not to assume. ⭐ The clause "grants live on permission sets" has a STRUCTURAL authored twin one panel away: position.sections.position.description renders "Capability lives on permission sets" as 能力在权限集上 / 能力は権限セットに / La capacidad reside en los permission sets, and this row copies the frame while substituting 授予 / 付与 / las concesiones for "grants". "authorization" takes sys_oauth_application._actions.enable_oauth_application.description (授权 / 認可 / la autorización) — ⚠️ ja answers this word two ways and the row picks deliberately: 認可 (authz, that leaf) over 認証 (authn, sys_device_code.description), because ADR-0066 is about what a principal MAY do. "resources" takes sys_organization._actions.leave_organization.confirmText (资源 / リソース / recursos). ⇒ 软件包声明的授权能力——ADR-0066 D1 的定义侧(授予在权限集上;要求在资源上) / パッケージが宣言する認可ケイパビリティ — ADR-0066 D1 の定義側(付与は権限セットに、要件はリソースに) / Capacidad de autorización declarada por el paquete — el lado de la DEFINICIÓN de ADR-0066 D1 (las concesiones residen en los conjuntos de permisos; los requisitos, en los recursos). ⚠️ es answers "permission sets" two ways — conjuntos de permisos (permission.sections.identity.description) and the English permission sets (position.sections.position.description) — and this row takes the Spanish one, because the leaf it is describing IS the permission domain\'s own definition side. ⭐ `ADR-0066` and `D1` are kept verbatim and asserted; the en\'s uppercase DEFINITION is carried as case in es and as plain text in zh/ja, which have no case to carry it with.',
372
+
'REWRITTEN AS PLAIN ADMIN COPY, in the voice the Setup review gave verbatim for this type. "the DEFINITION side of ADR-0066 D1" moved to the comment beside the registry row. "permission sets" takes the type label permission.label (权限集 / 権限セット / Conjunto de permisos, plural conjuntos de permisos); "grant" takes 授予 / 付与 / conceder, the verbs this catalog already uses for permission grants. zh/ja/es use an impersonal second clause, since the catalog carries no second person. ⇒ 软件包定义的一项权限;通过权限集授予 / パッケージが定義する権限。権限セットを通じて付与します / Permiso que define un paquete; se concede mediante conjuntos de permisos. No machine token is kept: ADR-0066 and D1 are exactly what this rewrite removed, asserted by the plain-copy guard below.',
367
373
},
368
374
];
369
375
@@ -659,10 +665,8 @@ describe('#19403 round 7 — the #19430 discipline, asserted AT THE SCHEMA', ()
659
665
it('the machine tokens the ledger decided to KEEP are still verbatim in every locale',()=>{
description: "Package-declared authorization capability — the DEFINITION side of ADR-0066 D1 (grants live on permission sets; requirements on resources)"
2393
+
description: "A permission a package defines; you grant it through permission sets"
description: "Capacidad de autorización declarada por el paquete — el lado de la DEFINICIÓN de ADR-0066 D1 (las concesiones residen en los conjuntos de permisos; los requisitos, en los recursos)"
2393
+
description: "Permiso que define un paquete; se concede mediante conjuntos de permisos"
0 commit comments