docs(audits): the census page's unchecked elevation figure, 93 to 94

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WQWCrorWxW5zDh4n6jCEF5
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

Author: claude

content/docs/permissions/tenant-audit-census.mdx

@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ would report a smaller number and would not say so.
 
 The fourth row is the one worth flagging to anyone citing it. **The 135 / 77%
 figure has no surviving corroboration anywhere in the tree.** This census reads
-131 of 233 (56%) as decidably elevated, with 93 more whose elevation is a
+131 of 233 (56%) as decidably elevated, with 94 more whose elevation is a
 run-time fact — so the claim is neither confirmed nor refuted, and the honest
 answer is that a static reading cannot settle it.