Sharing iP code quality feedback [for @noobmaster19]

[nus-se-bot]

We did an automated analysis of your code to detect potential areas to improve the code quality. We are sharing the results below, to help you improve the code further.

IMPORTANT: Note that the script looked for just a few easy-to-detect problems only, and at-most three example are given i.e., there can be other areas/places to improve.

Aspect: Tab Usage

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Naming boolean variables/methods

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Brace Style

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Package Name Style

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Class Name Style

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Dead Code

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Method Length

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Header Comments

Example from src/main/java/duke/app/Duke.java lines 29-32:

    /**
     * You should have your own function to generate a response to user input.
     * Replace this stub with your completed method.
     */

Suggestion: Ensure method/class header comments follow the format specified in the coding standard, in particular, the phrasing of the overview statement

Aspect: Recent Git Commit Message (Subject Only)

possible problems in commit 174ded4:

merged

• Not in imperative mood (?)
• Perhaps too short (?)

possible problems in commit df7fe22:

Refactored flow of parsing integers

• Not in imperative mood (?)

possible problems in commit e65311c:

assertions-added

• Not in imperative mood (?)

Suggestion: Follow the given conventions for Git commit messages

ℹ️ The bot account @cs2103-bot used to post this issue is un-manned. Do not reply to this post (as those replies will not be read). Instead, contact cs2103@comp.nus.edu.sg if you want to follow up on this post.