-
ABI directory exists (template-level)
-
No dangerous patterns found
-
100K lines; bot fleet for repository quality enforcement
-
Claims: “formal mathematical/statistical verification”
-
Bot action safety: Prove that automated bot actions (PRs, issues, fixes) are reversible and do not destroy repository state
-
Confidence threshold correctness: Prove that the robot-repo-automaton confidence thresholds correctly gate automated merges (no auto-merge below threshold)
-
Rule conflict resolution: Prove that when multiple bots (rhodibot, echidnabot, sustainabot, etc.) produce conflicting recommendations, the resolution is deterministic and documented
-
Rate limiting: Prove bots respect GitHub API rate limits and do not cause cascading failures across the fleet
-
Idris2 — For bot action safety and confidence threshold properties
-
Lean4 — For algebraic properties of confidence scoring if modeled as an ordered semiring
-
MEDIUM — The fleet manages automated repository changes. Incorrect bot behavior at scale could damage many repos. The “formal verification” claim should be substantiated.