Skip to content

gh stack rebase --continue doesn't report new conflicts hit while resuming a multi-commit branch rebase #430

Description

@ahar7911

Summary

gh stack rebase --continue only prints Conflicted files: listing for first conflict encountered when cascading one stacked branch onto another. If resolving that conflict and continuing causes git to hit a second conflict on a later commit within the same branch's replay, the tool does not report what files are now conflicted and just returns a generic wrapped error.

This can make it look like there's only one conflicted file when there are actually more. You can only see the other conflicts by manually running git status.

Steps to reproduce

  1. Create a stack with a branch containing at least two commits and at least two files, where:
    • Commit A modifies file1.txt so that there's a conflict with the (rebased) parent branch.
    • Commit B later modifies file2.txt so that it also conflicts with the parent branch, independently of commit A.
  2. Rebase the stack
  3. The tool stops on commit A's conflict and correctly prints:
    Conflicted files:
      C file1.tsx (lines N–M)
    
  4. Resolve file1.txt, stage it, run gh stack rebase --continue again.
  5. Git internally applies commit B next, which conflicts on file2.txt.

Expected behavior

Step 5 should print the same kind of Conflicted files: block, listing file2.txt with its conflict line numbers, like step 3 did for file1.txt.

Actual behavior

Step 5 prints a generic error:

rebase continue failed — resolve remaining conflicts and try again: exit status 1

No indication of which file(s) are now conflicted. The only way to discover where the new conflict is is running git status manually.

Proposed solution / notes

I'll be honest, not familiar with Go so this "solution" is mostly Claude. I did double check that it looks at least mostly right to me. Figured it might be helpful.

Traced this to cmd/rebase.go and internal/git/git.go:

  • printConflictDetails() / printConflictDetailsWithContinue() (cmd/rebase.go:545) is the function that formats the Conflicted files: block with per-file conflict-marker line numbers (via git.FindConflictMarkers). It's only called from the branch-to-branch cascade logic, at cmd/rebase.go:259 and :435.
  • continueRebase() (cmd/rebase.go:312) has a separate path for resuming an already in-progress git rebase within a single branch's multi-commit replay:
    if git.IsRebaseInProgress() {
        rebaseOpts := git.RebaseOpts{CommitterDateIsAuthorDate: state.CommitterDateIsAuthorDate}
        if err := git.RebaseContinue(rebaseOpts); err != nil {
            return fmt.Errorf("rebase continue failed — resolve remaining conflicts and try again: %w", err)
        }
    }
    This path never calls printConflictDetails.
  • Following RebaseContinue (internal/git/gitops.go:334) into tryAutoResolveRebase (internal/git/git.go:118), the conflicted-files list is actually fetched — just to check whether rerere already auto-resolved everything — and then discarded on the way out:
    conflicts, err := ConflictedFiles()
    if err != nil {
        return originalErr
    }
    if len(conflicts) > 0 {
        return originalErr   // <-- conflicts is right here and gets thrown away
    }

Fix: in continueRebase, when git.RebaseContinue returns an error, call printConflictDetailsWithContinue (using the still-in-progress rebase's current conflicted files, e.g. by calling git.ConflictedFiles() again, or by threading tryAutoResolveRebase's local conflicts slice out through the error) before returning, instead of just wrapping the raw error string. That gives resume-mid-branch conflicts the same reporting as cascade-boundary conflicts.

Environment

  • gh version: 2.97.0 (2026-07-31)
  • gh-stack extension: github/gh-stack v0.1.0
  • OS: macOS Tahoe 26.5.1

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions