Skip to content

Commit 9dd2950

Browse files
1 parent 384f809 commit 9dd2950

2 files changed

Lines changed: 7 additions & 3 deletions

File tree

advisories/github-reviewed/2026/02/GHSA-r8p8-qw9w-j9qv/GHSA-r8p8-qw9w-j9qv.json

Lines changed: 5 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,14 +1,18 @@
11
{
22
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
33
"id": "GHSA-r8p8-qw9w-j9qv",
4-
"modified": "2026-02-18T21:44:45Z",
4+
"modified": "2026-03-13T16:04:01Z",
55
"published": "2026-02-16T12:30:25Z",
66
"aliases": [
77
"CVE-2026-2415"
88
],
99
"summary": "pretix unsafely evaluates variables in emails",
1010
"details": "Emails sent by pretix can utilize placeholders that will be filled with customer data. For example, when `{name}` is used in an email template, it will be replaced with the buyer's name for the final email. This mechanism contained two security-relevant bugs:\n\n - It was possible to exfiltrate information about the pretix system through specially crafted placeholder names such as `{event.__init__.__code__.co_filename}}`. This way, an attacker with the ability to control email templates (usually every user of the pretix backend) could retrieve sensitive information from the system configuration, including even database passwords or API keys. pretix does include mechanisms to prevent the usage of such malicious placeholders, however due to a mistake in the code, they were not fully effective for the email subject.\n\n - Placeholders in subjects and plain text bodies of emails were wrongfully evaluated twice. Therefore, if the first evaluation of a placeholder again contains a placeholder, this second placeholder was rendered. This allows the rendering of placeholders controlled by the ticket buyer, and therefore the exploitation of the first issue as a ticket buyer. Luckily, the only buyer-controlled placeholder available in pretix by default (that is not validated in a way that prevents the issue) is `{invoice_company}`, which is very unusual (but not impossible) to be contained in an email subject template. In addition to broadening the attack surface of the first issue, this could theoretically also leak information about an order to one of the attendees within that order. However, we also consider this scenario very unlikely under typical conditions.\n\nOut of caution, pretix recommend that you rotate all passwords and API keys contained in your pretix.cfg https://docs.pretix.eu/self-hosting/config/  file.",
1111
"severity": [
12+
{
13+
"type": "CVSS_V3",
14+
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N"
15+
},
1216
{
1317
"type": "CVSS_V4",
1418
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/RE:L/U:Red"

advisories/github-reviewed/2026/03/GHSA-g8r9-g2v8-jv6f/GHSA-g8r9-g2v8-jv6f.json

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
11
{
22
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
33
"id": "GHSA-g8r9-g2v8-jv6f",
4-
"modified": "2026-03-06T22:44:18Z",
4+
"modified": "2026-03-13T16:03:33Z",
55
"published": "2026-03-06T16:43:31Z",
66
"aliases": [
77
"CVE-2026-29783"
88
],
99
"summary": "GitHub Copilot CLI Dangerous Shell Expansion Patterns Enable Arbitrary Code Execution",
10-
"details": "## Summary\n\nA security vulnerability has been identified in GitHub Copilot CLI's shell tool that could allow arbitrary code execution through crafted bash parameter expansion patterns. An attacker who can influence the commands executed by the agent (e.g., via prompt injection through repository files, MCP server responses, or user instructions) can exploit bash parameter transformation operators to execute hidden commands, bypassing the safety assessment that classifies commands as \"read-only.\"\n\n## Details\n\nThe vulnerability stems from how the CLI's shell safety assessment evaluates commands before execution. The safety layer parses and classifies shell commands as either read-only (safe) or write-capable (requires user approval). However, several bash parameter expansion features can embed executable code within arguments to otherwise read-only commands, causing them to appear safe while actually performing arbitrary operations.\n\nThe specific dangerous patterns are:\n\n1. **`${var@P}` — Prompt expansion:** The `@P` parameter transformation operator evaluates its value as a prompt string, which interprets embedded command substitutions. This allows hidden command execution inside what appears to be a simple variable reference.\n\n2. **`${var=value}` / `${var:=value}` — Assignment side-effects:** These forms assign values to variables as a side-effect of expansion. When chained with `@P`, an attacker can progressively build up a command substitution string across multiple expansions.\n\n3. **`${!var}` — Indirect expansion:** Dereferences an arbitrary variable name, which can be combined with other patterns to construct and execute commands dynamically.\n\n4. **Nested `$(cmd)` or `<(cmd)` inside `${...}` expansions:** Command substitution or process substitution embedded within parameter expansion default values (e.g., `${HOME:-$(whoami)}`) executes the nested command.\n\n### Proof of Concept\n\nThe following command appears to run a harmless `echo`, but actually executes `touch /tmp/pwned` through chained parameter expansion:\n\n```bash\necho ${a=\"$\"}${b=\"$a(touch /tmp/pwned)\"}${b@P}\n```\n\n**How it works:**\n- `${a=\"$\"}` assigns the literal `$` character to variable `a`\n- `${b=\"$a(touch /tmp/pwned)\"}` expands `$a` to `$`, constructing the string `$(touch /tmp/pwned)` and assigning it to `b`\n- `${b@P}` applies prompt expansion to `b`, which evaluates the embedded `$(touch /tmp/pwned)` command substitution\n\nPrior to the fix, the safety assessment would classify `echo` as a read-only command and allow execution without user confirmation — even in modes that normally require approval for write operations.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker who can influence command text sent to the shell tool — for example, through:\n- Prompt injection via malicious repository content (README files, code comments, issue bodies)\n- Compromised or malicious MCP server responses\n- Crafted user instructions containing obfuscated commands\n\n— could achieve arbitrary code execution on the user's workstation. This is possible even in permission modes that require user approval for write operations, since the commands can appear to be using only read-only utilities to ultimately trigger write operations.\n\nSuccessful exploitation could lead to data exfiltration, file modification, or further system compromise.\n\n## Affected Versions\n\n- GitHub Copilot CLI versions prior to 0.0.423\n\n## Remediation and Mitigation\n\n### Fix\n\nThe fix adds two layers of defense:\n\n1. **Parse-time detection:** The shell safety assessment analyzes `${...}` expansion nodes within bash commands, detecting dangerous operators (`@P`, `=`, `:=`, `!`) and nested command/process substitutions. Commands containing these patterns are downgraded from read-only to write-capable, ensuring they require user approval.\n\n2. **Unconditional blocking:** Commands with dangerous expansion patterns are unconditionally blocked at the tool execution layer — regardless of permission mode (including `--yolo` / autopilot). This prevents exploitation even when all commands are auto-approved.\n\n3. **System prompt hardening:** The bash shell tool's system prompt now includes explicit instructions for the LLM to refuse executing commands with these patterns, providing a defense-in-depth layer.\n\n### User Actions\n\n1. **Upgrade** GitHub Copilot CLI to **0.0.423** or later.\n2. **Exercise caution** when working in untrusted repositories or with untrusted MCP servers.\n3. **Review** any shell commands suggested by the agent that contain complex parameter expansion patterns.",
10+
"details": "## Summary\n\nA security vulnerability has been identified in GitHub Copilot CLI's shell tool that could allow arbitrary code execution through crafted bash parameter expansion patterns. An attacker who can influence the commands executed by the agent (e.g., via prompt injection through repository files, MCP server responses, or user instructions) can exploit bash parameter transformation operators to execute hidden commands, bypassing the safety assessment that classifies commands as \"read-only.\"\n\n## Details\n\nThe vulnerability stems from how the CLI's shell safety assessment evaluates commands before execution. The safety layer parses and classifies shell commands as either read-only (safe) or write-capable (requires user approval). However, several bash parameter expansion features can embed executable code within arguments to otherwise read-only commands, causing them to appear safe while actually performing arbitrary operations.\n\nThe specific dangerous patterns are:\n\n1. **`${var@P}` — Prompt expansion:** The `@P` parameter transformation operator evaluates its value as a prompt string, which interprets embedded command substitutions. This allows hidden command execution inside what appears to be a simple variable reference.\n\n2. **`${var=value}` / `${var:=value}` — Assignment side-effects:** These forms assign values to variables as a side-effect of expansion. When chained with `@P`, an attacker can progressively build up a command substitution string across multiple expansions.\n\n3. **`${!var}` — Indirect expansion:** Dereferences an arbitrary variable name, which can be combined with other patterns to construct and execute commands dynamically.\n\n4. **Nested `$(cmd)` or `<(cmd)` inside `${...}` expansions:** Command substitution or process substitution embedded within parameter expansion default values (e.g., `${HOME:-$(whoami)}`) executes the nested command.\n\n### Proof of Concept\n\nThe following command appears to run a harmless `echo`, but actually executes `touch /tmp/pwned` through chained parameter expansion:\n\n```bash\necho ${a=\"$\"}${b=\"$a(touch /tmp/pwned)\"}${b@P}\n```\n\n**How it works:**\n- `${a=\"$\"}` assigns the literal `$` character to variable `a`\n- `${b=\"$a(touch /tmp/pwned)\"}` expands `$a` to `$`, constructing the string `$(touch /tmp/pwned)` and assigning it to `b`\n- `${b@P}` applies prompt expansion to `b`, which evaluates the embedded `$(touch /tmp/pwned)` command substitution\n\nPrior to the fix, the safety assessment would classify `echo` as a read-only command and allow execution without user confirmation — even in modes that normally require approval for write operations.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker who can influence command text sent to the shell tool — for example, through:\n- Prompt injection via malicious repository content (README files, code comments, issue bodies)\n- Compromised or malicious MCP server responses\n- Crafted user instructions containing obfuscated commands\n\n— could achieve arbitrary code execution on the user's workstation. This is possible even in permission modes that require user approval for write operations, since the commands can appear to be using only read-only utilities to ultimately trigger write operations.\n\nSuccessful exploitation could lead to data exfiltration, file modification, or further system compromise.\n\n## Affected Versions\n\n- GitHub Copilot CLI versions prior to 0.0.423\n\n## Remediation and Mitigation\n\n### Fix\n\nThe fix adds three layers of defense:\n\n1. **Parse-time detection:** The shell safety assessment analyzes `${...}` expansion nodes within bash commands, detecting dangerous operators (`@P`, `=`, `:=`, `!`) and nested command/process substitutions. Commands containing these patterns are downgraded from read-only to write-capable, ensuring they require user approval.\n\n2. **Unconditional blocking:** Commands with dangerous expansion patterns are unconditionally blocked at the tool execution layer — regardless of permission mode (including `--yolo` / autopilot). This prevents exploitation even when all commands are auto-approved.\n\n3. **System prompt hardening:** The bash shell tool's system prompt now includes explicit instructions for the LLM to refuse executing commands with these patterns, providing a defense-in-depth layer.\n\n### User Actions\n\n1. **Upgrade** GitHub Copilot CLI to **0.0.423** or later.\n2. **Exercise caution** when working in untrusted repositories or with untrusted MCP servers.\n3. **Review** any shell commands suggested by the agent that contain complex parameter expansion patterns.",
1111
"severity": [
1212
{
1313
"type": "CVSS_V4",

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)