diff --git a/packages/schematics/angular/refactor/jasmine-vitest/transformers/jasmine-spy.ts b/packages/schematics/angular/refactor/jasmine-vitest/transformers/jasmine-spy.ts
index 68a76b378194..7506cea81e0c 100644
--- a/packages/schematics/angular/refactor/jasmine-vitest/transformers/jasmine-spy.ts
+++ b/packages/schematics/angular/refactor/jasmine-vitest/transformers/jasmine-spy.ts
@@ -72,20 +72,36 @@ function getUnwrappedParent(node: ts.Node): ts.Node | undefined {
 }
 
 function isChainedWithAnd(node: ts.Node): boolean {
+  let previous: ts.Node = node;
   let parent = node.parent;
   while (parent) {
-    if (ts.isPropertyAccessExpression(parent)) {
-      if (ts.isIdentifier(parent.name) && parent.name.text === 'and') {
+    if (ts.isPropertyAccessExpression(parent) && ts.isIdentifier(parent.name)) {
+      if (parent.name.text === 'and') {
         return true;
       }
-    } else if (ts.isElementAccessExpression(parent)) {
-      if (
-        ts.isStringLiteralLike(parent.argumentExpression) &&
-        parent.argumentExpression.text === 'and'
-      ) {
+      // `withArgs(...)` returns the spy, so a strategy may still follow.
+      if (parent.name.text === 'withArgs') {
+        previous = parent;
+        parent = parent.parent;
+        continue;
+      }
+    } else if (
+      ts.isElementAccessExpression(parent) &&
+      ts.isStringLiteralLike(parent.argumentExpression)
+    ) {
+      if (parent.argumentExpression.text === 'and') {
         return true;
       }
-    } else if (isTransparentWrapper(parent)) {
+      if (parent.argumentExpression.text === 'withArgs') {
+        previous = parent;
+        parent = parent.parent;
+        continue;
+      }
+    } else if (
+      isTransparentWrapper(parent) ||
+      (ts.isCallExpression(parent) && parent.expression === previous)
+    ) {
+      previous = parent;
       parent = parent.parent;
       continue;
     }
@@ -95,6 +111,33 @@ function isChainedWithAnd(node: ts.Node): boolean {
   return false;
 }
 
+/**
+ * Checks whether a spy expression chain contains a `withArgs(...)` link.
+ */
+function chainContainsWithArgs(expression: ts.Expression): boolean {
+  let current: ts.Expression = unwrapExpression(expression);
+  while (true) {
+    if (ts.isCallExpression(current)) {
+      current = unwrapExpression(current.expression);
+    } else if (ts.isPropertyAccessExpression(current)) {
+      if (ts.isIdentifier(current.name) && current.name.text === 'withArgs') {
+        return true;
+      }
+      current = unwrapExpression(current.expression);
+    } else if (ts.isElementAccessExpression(current)) {
+      if (
+        ts.isStringLiteralLike(current.argumentExpression) &&
+        current.argumentExpression.text === 'withArgs'
+      ) {
+        return true;
+      }
+      current = unwrapExpression(current.expression);
+    } else {
+      return false;
+    }
+  }
+}
+
 function isSpyCreation(node: ts.Expression): boolean {
   const expression = unwrapExpression(node);
   if (!ts.isCallExpression(expression)) {
@@ -181,6 +224,19 @@ function transformSpyStrategy(node: ts.CallExpression, refactorCtx: RefactorCont
   }
 
   if (spyCall) {
+    // Vitest mocks have no `withArgs`, so a strategy for specific arguments cannot be converted.
+    // The whole statement is left untouched, with a single TODO on the outermost strategy call;
+    // inner `.and` chains reached while the visitor descends are covered by that TODO.
+    if (chainContainsWithArgs(spyCall)) {
+      if (!isChainedWithAnd(node)) {
+        const category = 'withArgs';
+        reporter.recordTodo(category, sourceFile, node);
+        addTodoComment(node, category);
+      }
+
+      return node;
+    }
+
     let newMethodName: string | undefined;
     let args = node.arguments;
 
diff --git a/packages/schematics/angular/refactor/jasmine-vitest/transformers/jasmine-spy_spec.ts b/packages/schematics/angular/refactor/jasmine-vitest/transformers/jasmine-spy_spec.ts
index e14de03c3c17..5c82afd10c53 100644
--- a/packages/schematics/angular/refactor/jasmine-vitest/transformers/jasmine-spy_spec.ts
+++ b/packages/schematics/angular/refactor/jasmine-vitest/transformers/jasmine-spy_spec.ts
@@ -145,6 +145,36 @@ getSpy().and.callThrough();`,
       input: `spyOn(service, 'myMethod').and.unknownStrategy();`,
       expected: `// TODO: vitest-migration: Unsupported spy strategy ".and.unknownStrategy()" found. Please migrate this manually. See: https://vitest.dev/api/mocked.html#mock
 vi.spyOn(service, 'myMethod').and.unknownStrategy();`,
+    },
+    {
+      description: 'should add a TODO for a spy strategy configured with .withArgs()',
+      input: `spyOn(service, 'myMethod').withArgs(1).and.returnValue(2);`,
+      expected: `// TODO: vitest-migration: Vitest does not have a direct equivalent for spy.withArgs(). Please migrate this manually, for example with mockImplementation() that checks the arguments. See: https://vitest.dev/api/mock.html#mockimplementation
+vi.spyOn(service, 'myMethod').withArgs(1).and.returnValue(2);`,
+    },
+    {
+      description: 'should add a single TODO for multiple chained .withArgs() strategies',
+      input: `mySpy.withArgs(1).and.returnValue(10).withArgs(2).and.returnValue(20);`,
+      expected: `// TODO: vitest-migration: Vitest does not have a direct equivalent for spy.withArgs(). Please migrate this manually, for example with mockImplementation() that checks the arguments. See: https://vitest.dev/api/mock.html#mockimplementation
+mySpy.withArgs(1).and.returnValue(10).withArgs(2).and.returnValue(20);`,
+    },
+    {
+      description: 'should not transform a default strategy chained after .withArgs()',
+      input: `mySpy.withArgs(1).and.returnValue(2).and.returnValue(0);`,
+      expected: `// TODO: vitest-migration: Vitest does not have a direct equivalent for spy.withArgs(). Please migrate this manually, for example with mockImplementation() that checks the arguments. See: https://vitest.dev/api/mock.html#mockimplementation
+mySpy.withArgs(1).and.returnValue(2).and.returnValue(0);`,
+    },
+    {
+      description: 'should add a TODO for .withArgs() on an existing spy',
+      input: `mySpy.withArgs(1).and.returnValue(2);`,
+      expected: `// TODO: vitest-migration: Vitest does not have a direct equivalent for spy.withArgs(). Please migrate this manually, for example with mockImplementation() that checks the arguments. See: https://vitest.dev/api/mock.html#mockimplementation
+mySpy.withArgs(1).and.returnValue(2);`,
+    },
+    {
+      description: 'should add a TODO for a wrapped .withArgs() call',
+      input: `mySpy.withArgs(1)!.and.returnValue(2);`,
+      expected: `// TODO: vitest-migration: Vitest does not have a direct equivalent for spy.withArgs(). Please migrate this manually, for example with mockImplementation() that checks the arguments. See: https://vitest.dev/api/mock.html#mockimplementation
+mySpy.withArgs(1)!.and.returnValue(2);`,
     },
     {
       description: 'should correctly identify chained spies with element access (bracket notation)',
diff --git a/packages/schematics/angular/refactor/jasmine-vitest/utils/todo-notes.ts b/packages/schematics/angular/refactor/jasmine-vitest/utils/todo-notes.ts
index 0aa2a820698d..8b0db3cd45dc 100644
--- a/packages/schematics/angular/refactor/jasmine-vitest/utils/todo-notes.ts
+++ b/packages/schematics/angular/refactor/jasmine-vitest/utils/todo-notes.ts
@@ -165,6 +165,12 @@ export const TODO_NOTES = {
       ' the original implementation but also clears the recorded calls.',
     url: 'https://vitest.dev/api/mock.html#mockreset',
   },
+  'withArgs': {
+    message:
+      'Vitest does not have a direct equivalent for spy.withArgs().' +
+      ' Please migrate this manually, for example with mockImplementation() that checks the arguments.',
+    url: 'https://vitest.dev/api/mock.html#mockimplementation',
+  },
   'mostRecent-without-args': {
     message:
       'Direct usage of mostRecent() is not supported.' +