In "1.3 SBOM Type" we have
Specific examples
" creator comment ": [" Type : Build "]
It would be better to have:
Specific examples
" creator comment ": [" SBOM type : Build "]
This would make in compatible with the OpenChain Telco SBOM Guide
See https://github.com/OpenChain-Project/Telco-WG/blob/main/OpenChain-Telco-SBOM-Guide_EN.md
In section 3.5 SBOM Build information you have:
SBOMs conforming to the OpenChain Telco SBOM Guide MUST provide their SBOM Types as defined by CISA in the CreatorComment field.
The SBOM Type RECOMMENDED syntax is “SBOM Type: xxx” where “xxx” is one of the 6 keywords “Design”, “Source”, “Build”, “Analyzed”, “Deployed” and “Runtime”.
In "1.3 SBOM Type" we have
Specific examples
" creator comment ": [" Type : Build "]
It would be better to have:
Specific examples
" creator comment ": [" SBOM type : Build "]
This would make in compatible with the OpenChain Telco SBOM Guide
See https://github.com/OpenChain-Project/Telco-WG/blob/main/OpenChain-Telco-SBOM-Guide_EN.md
In section 3.5 SBOM Build information you have:
SBOMs conforming to the OpenChain Telco SBOM Guide MUST provide their SBOM Types as defined by CISA in the CreatorComment field.
The SBOM Type RECOMMENDED syntax is “SBOM Type: xxx” where “xxx” is one of the 6 keywords “Design”, “Source”, “Build”, “Analyzed”, “Deployed” and “Runtime”.