You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
With a few colleagues, we were ecstatic about the performance of codex cli + 5.2xhigh, for us, the best cognitive architecture we have seen so far. Then, as it often happens in this rapidly evolving field, the performances degraded substantially.
To clarify : we are amongst those who think opus is a good model for toying and communication, but not for complex architecture and thinking. codex cli + 5.2xhigh was genuinely impressive and a generation or two above opus.
We had notice also that the 5.2-codex (and subsequent -codex versions) were really not on par with the 5.2 xhigh, but probably openai answer to "your models are too slow" (which is.. absurd, I would favor depth and accuracy to speed anytime, but that's another discussion). So I could definitely understand the drastic loss of performance if indeed instead of using 5.2 xhigh everywhere, they started routing to 5.2-codex...
My question to you : with your changes, do you somehow get back the performances you once had too ? or are there some other under the hood updates we can't access ?
And a second question maybe : I saw your branch for 5.4 with the same trick; which one do you prefer those days ? 5.4 is faster but "dumber" so far for me, at least with the regular codex cli.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi there,
With a few colleagues, we were ecstatic about the performance of codex cli + 5.2xhigh, for us, the best cognitive architecture we have seen so far. Then, as it often happens in this rapidly evolving field, the performances degraded substantially.
To clarify : we are amongst those who think opus is a good model for toying and communication, but not for complex architecture and thinking. codex cli + 5.2xhigh was genuinely impressive and a generation or two above opus.
We had notice also that the 5.2-codex (and subsequent -codex versions) were really not on par with the 5.2 xhigh, but probably openai answer to "your models are too slow" (which is.. absurd, I would favor depth and accuracy to speed anytime, but that's another discussion). So I could definitely understand the drastic loss of performance if indeed instead of using 5.2 xhigh everywhere, they started routing to 5.2-codex...
My question to you : with your changes, do you somehow get back the performances you once had too ? or are there some other under the hood updates we can't access ?
And a second question maybe : I saw your branch for 5.4 with the same trick; which one do you prefer those days ? 5.4 is faster but "dumber" so far for me, at least with the regular codex cli.
All reactions