Repository navigation
Commit fac287a
committed
board: D-BSW-0 requires BOTH feature configurations, as the plan already did
Found by verifying a review claim rather than dismissing it. The codex
connector reported a commit `a0f7759` reconciling this PR's scope; that sha
exists nowhere -- its own report says the environment had no git remote and no
authenticated gh, so the commit never left its sandbox. Checking its five
claims against this branch instead of hunting the sha turned up one that was
NOT satisfied here.
The plan's M0 says both `--features mailbox-thoughtspace` and
`--features with-engine,mailbox-thoughtspace` are the deliverable, because
`dispatch_busdto` and `busdto_bridge_test.rs` are `with-engine`-gated
(`engine_bridge.rs:280`) and a mailbox-only job compiles neither -- it stays
green while the paired configuration breaks. The board's D-BSW-0 row still said
"One line" and named only `mailbox-thoughtspace`, so an implementer working from
the board would add one job and mark the deliverable done, satisfying the row
while leaving the actual gap open.
Exactly the defect shape CodeRabbit caught for D-BSW-2 one commit ago: the fix
landed in the plan and was not propagated to the board, and the two then
disagreed. A per-deliverable plan/board diff is the check that catches this
class; grepping for the fixed phrase does not, because the plan matches and the
board's silence looks like absence of an opinion rather than a contradiction.
Row edit only: 1811 lines before and after, D-BSW 5 rows, D-NXG 12 rows.
Gates re-run: index byte-identical (regenerated after the board write),
append-only OK (9 checked), no new citation decay, dids green, zero crates/.1 parent c5d12e5 commit fac287a
1 file changed
Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
15 | 15 | | |
16 | 16 | | |
17 | 17 | | |
18 | | - | |
| 18 | + | |
19 | 19 | | |
20 | 20 | | |
21 | 21 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments