Repository navigation
Commit 0860320
committed
plan(cycle-driver): Arm BLW — 64k Bible lens wave, four stances, measured Horizontverschmelzung
Operator-directed. Wires the whole Bible as ONE 64k SoA bake through
cycle_driver so 64k thought bodies fire per cycle, with the four shipped
stances (Hegel/Nietzsche/Kant/Wittgenstein, already in probe_eyes_opened.rs)
as READS over the sealed version series, and Gadamer's Horizontverschmelzung
as a measured trajectory rather than a label.
THE ONE ARCHITECTURAL DECISION, made rather than offered. The operator gave two
shapes: six parallel SoAs (base + Gadamer + four lenses), or one sealed series
read as a time series. The six-SoA shape is REJECTED, and not on cost grounds:
four lens SoAs would be copies of the same 64k verse rows differing only in
which stance reads them. A stance read is a PROJECTION, not a cross-input
derivation of a higher KIND, so the zero-copy law's ELEVATED carve-out (the
Locus::Quorum precedent) does not cover it — the zero-copy-warden verdict for
that shape is MATERIALIZES. The 6x memory is the smaller objection.
GADAMER, MECHANICALLY. Both readings the operator named are the SAME data:
a priori (Vorurteil — prejudice as the CONDITION of understanding, which is
Gadamer's actual claim) = the prior sealed version Vn read at plan-
evaluation time and fed into Vn+1's thought. Single-version read: FILTER.
hindsight (wirkungsgeschichtliches Bewusstsein) = a version RANGE Vn..Vm
deinterlaced at read time. Range read: CASCADE.
Nothing is chosen at bake time; temporal.rs already distinguishes them per
E-MARKOV-TEMPORAL-STREAM-1. That is why the time-series shape is not merely
cheaper — it is the only one where the a-priori and hindsight readings are the
same object.
FOUR DELIVERABLES, each with its falsifier. The one most likely to fail is
D-BLW-2's discrimination twin: four stances that rank everything identically
carry exactly as much information as one (the closed_class_guess 150/150
defect), and four that agree nowhere are noise rather than perspectives. Both
halves are asserted via jc::stats::binary_association, reporting counts and
BOTH marginals — never bare kappa, which is the reason that type exists.
D-BLW-3 makes Horizontverschmelzung falsifiable: fusion must MOVE. Flat kappa
across the version series kills the Gadamer claim and regrades it to "four
independent stance reads over a shared corpus" — still true, still useful, not
Gadamer. The a-priori and hindsight trajectories must also differ, or the
distinction is not doing work and should be dropped rather than narrated.
CLAIM CEILING carried from the D3a/D3b split: kappa and phi between lens
projections measure OVERLAP, not validity. This is a reliability-class
statement. Calling it validity needs D3b's external criterion, which stays
blocked — #888's board correction exists because that line was crossed once
already. And jc::stats p-values are classical independent-sample p-values;
verses within a book are domain-correlated, so any significance claim here
needs its own justified dependence model (C4, as corrected).
Adds no subsystem: the lens is a thought body in the existing 5.4 seam, the
corpus is the shipped KJV bake, the stances are the shipped B6 panel, and the
fusion read uses temporal.rs's existing surface. Section 7's exclusions hold
verbatim — persist_sink.rs and temporal.rs are consumed, not modified. The jc
additive constraint continues to hold: those statistics are the independent
reference frame this arm is measured against, and are not to be "improved"
while serving as the oracle.
Plan + STATUS_BOARD only; no code.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01K3RyLEbuNSHxxB3NTTrGki1 parent 3b2a937 commit 0860320
2 files changed
Lines changed: 101 additions & 0 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
12 | 12 | | |
13 | 13 | | |
14 | 14 | | |
| 15 | + | |
| 16 | + | |
| 17 | + | |
| 18 | + | |
15 | 19 | | |
16 | 20 | | |
17 | 21 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
502 | 502 | | |
503 | 503 | | |
504 | 504 | | |
| 505 | + | |
| 506 | + | |
| 507 | + | |
| 508 | + | |
| 509 | + | |
| 510 | + | |
| 511 | + | |
| 512 | + | |
| 513 | + | |
| 514 | + | |
| 515 | + | |
| 516 | + | |
| 517 | + | |
| 518 | + | |
| 519 | + | |
| 520 | + | |
| 521 | + | |
| 522 | + | |
| 523 | + | |
| 524 | + | |
| 525 | + | |
| 526 | + | |
| 527 | + | |
| 528 | + | |
| 529 | + | |
| 530 | + | |
| 531 | + | |
| 532 | + | |
| 533 | + | |
| 534 | + | |
| 535 | + | |
| 536 | + | |
| 537 | + | |
| 538 | + | |
| 539 | + | |
| 540 | + | |
| 541 | + | |
| 542 | + | |
| 543 | + | |
| 544 | + | |
| 545 | + | |
| 546 | + | |
| 547 | + | |
| 548 | + | |
| 549 | + | |
| 550 | + | |
| 551 | + | |
| 552 | + | |
| 553 | + | |
| 554 | + | |
| 555 | + | |
| 556 | + | |
| 557 | + | |
| 558 | + | |
| 559 | + | |
| 560 | + | |
| 561 | + | |
| 562 | + | |
| 563 | + | |
| 564 | + | |
| 565 | + | |
| 566 | + | |
| 567 | + | |
| 568 | + | |
| 569 | + | |
| 570 | + | |
| 571 | + | |
| 572 | + | |
| 573 | + | |
| 574 | + | |
| 575 | + | |
| 576 | + | |
| 577 | + | |
| 578 | + | |
| 579 | + | |
| 580 | + | |
| 581 | + | |
| 582 | + | |
| 583 | + | |
| 584 | + | |
| 585 | + | |
| 586 | + | |
| 587 | + | |
| 588 | + | |
| 589 | + | |
| 590 | + | |
| 591 | + | |
| 592 | + | |
| 593 | + | |
| 594 | + | |
| 595 | + | |
| 596 | + | |
| 597 | + | |
| 598 | + | |
| 599 | + | |
| 600 | + | |
| 601 | + | |
0 commit comments